RedRamage

Did they show that last night? That's funny. Do you wanna know the break down of those losses over the 3.5 years of Campbell? 2021: 7 2022: 3 2023: 2 2024: 0 So the Lions got blown out a bunch when Campbell was first here... since then they've rarely been blown out by a lot. The graphic paints it like if the Lions get down they fall apart... but the reality is that our 2021 team just sucked and since then we're been pretty dang good. I mean if you take out 2021 -- Dan's rookie coaching year (I'm not including his interim gig with the Dolphins), Holmes hasn't really gotten a chance to make over the roster... so not completely unfair to just say 2021 is a lost year and not a good job of the people running the show -- Any, take out 2021... the Lions are 29-14 in the regular season, plus 2-1 in the playoffs. That's pretty damn good.

Also gotta say... watching the highlights of this game... if you didn't know any better you'd swear it was a home game witht he way the crowd sounds.

Maybe... probably?? Right now Campbell has a .534 winning percentage. If we assuming some leaner years will happen (injuries, retiring stars, whatever), let's say he goes .500 from now until he reaches win number 67. That's 36 more wins plus of course 36 more losses, or 72 more games. 8 more games this season means 64 more after this, or around 4 more years. 4 more years seems doable as a HC. Campbell's certainly not old, but and he definitely seems to have a love for the game so I don't seem him deciding to suddenly hang it up.

Dan Campbell is now one of only eight Lions coaches who have 30 or more wins. And on a side note if I had a nickel for every Lions head coach who was named Clark I'd have 15 cents... which isn't a lot of it's odd that it's happened three times. 66 - Fontes 53 - Clark, Potsy 53 - Wilson 47 - Parker 43 - Schmidt 43 - Clark, Monte 36 - Caldwell 31 - Campbell Edit to add: These are regular season wins btw. Wanna look at post season? It ain't pretty... 3 - Parker 2 - Wilson 2 - Campbell 1 - Clark 1 - Fontes

Okay, yeah, technically it'll be a neutral field... but if the Lions make the SB I expect it to be the most lopsided crowd in a long time. First, I suspect there will be a LOT of Lions fans who put up the big bucks to go. How many years have we been waiting? Second, I suspect the Lions would be the preferred rooting interest of most of the fans of the other 30 teams that aren't there.

What did he say?

It's kinda funny... because I wasn't even really angry that we were losing. I mean I wasn't happy and it wasn't that I thought we'd come back and win... It was just: "Meh... bad games happen." I heard this said about baseball but honestly it applies to all sports I think: It's the fans of the mediocre teams that are most invested in the wins and losses. Fans of a bad team assume losses will happen and if they win: "Well, that's nice, but that isn't like we're all of a sudden good." Fans of a good team assume a win, but if they lose: "Well, bad games happen. We'll get back on the winning side next game." It's just the people in the middle who feel the outcome of the game is defining if their team is good or bad because it matters each game. I'm not saying this to try to trash on those fans who are like that of middle of the road teams. Lord knows I've been that fan many, many times. No, the reason I'm saying this is that I 100% felts like a fan of a good team last night. I certainly wasn't happy that the Lions were getting their butt whopped, but I never thought: "There goes the season... our team sucks." It's amazing how far we've come in 4 years.

Bears gave up 9 sacks and 13 Tackles for a Loss. 21 times the Patroits... the Patroits! ...were making tackles inside the Bears OL. I mean... holy crap thats bad. Prior to the Bears game the Pats had a total of 16 sacks... they averaged 1.78 sacks per game in the previous 9 games. This one game jumped their average to 2.5 sacks per game. Packers fans gotta be just pissed right now. All three other teams in the North had pretty crappy games. The Vikings didn't even manage a TD against the Jags, the Bears OL apparently thought this was their bye week, and the Lions were getting their butts handed to them in the first half. And yet somehow only the Bears lost.

Really SOLs would have been the Lions being the others side... dominate a team in the first half... 5 INTS, and still lose.

Everyone was complaining that he was too close to the right upright, so... ya know... he corrected that.

Well... time to see if this coaching staff can make second half adjustments.

Yes but I believe he also played LT in the preseason too.

I dunno if that's a good idea. Decker was out for the rest of the season then I'd put Sewell over there, but if he's only going to be out a game leave Sewell where he is, where he knows the plays at his position.

We could put Iffy in a roll of pass-rushing linebacker??

How many plays until Moseley is done for the season?

Deadpool style! On a side note, do you know that the Lions used to wear red?

They did go 16-0, and then lost in the SB.

15 minutes left... I wonder if there's any "standing deals" out there where a team basically says: "Yeah, we're hoping to trade this player for higher than what you're offering, but if we don't get any better offers by 3:55, he's yours for the price you offered."

It's kinda a catch-22 situation though, isn't it? I mean if you fire the GM, then who handles the trades to ensure you get top value rather than just throwing away good options for little return? It's almost like teams should have an "interim" person on staff. Someone who's hired by the owner to just sit in on meetings and shadow the GM so he or she can step in if necessary but it's known that this person will never be hired as the full time GM.

He was a second round pick just about 1.5 years ago... if it works out it'll be seen as a genius move... get a 2nd round talent for a 4th round cost. I also don't really figure the Panthers as a powerhouse in terms of developing so it's possible that the Cowboys could find a way to motivate/use him that the Panthers just couldn't.

I don't think I'd want to pay a 4th for him.

Still some time, but it I suspect nothing much more will happen. Still wished they added Arden Key, but I don't think he would have been a AMJOR impact guy, just a more experienced rotational piece vs. a lot of unproven, unknown guys. I supposed if we get Paschal back here soon that could sorta kinda be considered another addition as he's missed the last two games.

Texans' Reddit reaction to the trade:

I suspect it'll depend a LOT on how well he picks up the Lions terminology and scheme, but I agree with MB that he likely won't get starter-level snaps.