casimir

I can't even do this in my dreams. That guy is something else.

He wasn't good early. At one point it was 26 strikes and 24 balls thrown. Not a good thing from the ace the day after a bullpen game.

I like aggressive running, but Cabrera/Santiago should have read that ball better. Stanton had a relatively easy angle to field and throw. Maybe Santiago had the stop sign up, we've seen Cabrera run through that before. The Reyes SB attempt by itself probably isn't that bad, but following up Cabrera's failed attempt for 3B probably wasn't the time. Then again, the team is struggling for runs, so ....

Over 70 million people (some dead) voted for this soulless huckster.

But he should be credited for doing it very well, possibly HOF worthy.

I'm going to hold off on a reaction until I hear Jackass' thoughts.

At least we got to see Cole flake out, and at a reasonable hour, too.

Precisely. What's next, if a hitter goes down 0-2, they get to pick one quadrant of the strike zone where the rest of the pitches must go to?

The modern day hitter. Gallo has only one opposing IF actually on the IF. Can't figure out a way to dribble one towards 3B for a safety. No reason to ban the shift when hitters do this to themselves.

His BB/SO ratios are interesting. All of his SO>BB seasons were the 6 earliest of his career. He was about even for his career. A lot of SBs but also a lot of CSs.

Winner, winner, kielbasa dinner.

I'm listening to a podcast with Rod Carew as a guest. I check bbref for his stats. 18 time all star in a 19 year career. I'd have never guessed he had that many appearances, especially since he played so many seasons as a nonpower threat 1B.

I'll take Things That Will Never Happen for $200.

Is Billy Crystal available for the ceremonial first pitch?

And of course, Keith Hernandez Mustache has a page, too.

A few years ago (maybe more than a few), they pranked a former MLB player by posting only his pictures on its main page for a day. I think it was Chris Singleton who was on MLB Network at the time.

Holy crap, its true, not a photoshop.

You know, another way to look at who replaces Baez and keeps things as on par for Detroit as much possible is you look at what Baez's profile is as a player (defense is his calling card and he will feast/famine offensively) and try to match that as much as possible with his replacement. I think in that light Short could come as close to Baez's defense as anyone on the 40, and just assume that the offense is going to be a famine. With CastroW or Clemens (who probably isn't a SS option anyway), you know the defense is going to fall short, and if there is nothing out of the bat, well, then what?

Short is at .244/.373/.415 in 51 PAs. 9 BBs vs 17 SOs. 1 SB & 0 CS. CastroW is at .265/.306/.324 in 36 PAs. 2 BBs vs 10 SOs, 3 SBs & 1 CS.

I was thinking for off MLB in total for betting revenue.

As was addressed on TtC, the lack of a bench IF for consecutive days didn't make any sense to me. It especially doesn't make sense when carrying a 3rd C. I understand the desire to use Haase as an extra OF, but carrying a 3rd C at the expense of keeping only 2 healthy MIFs (in theory they could use Cabrera as a 1B and Torkelson as a 3B if those situations presented themselves). Eventually they did recall CastroW, which while not ideal, at least he's been out there before. I don't know, I suppose the unknown of Baez's thumb truly was day-to-day and the decision IL him was just a matter of, well, they've gotten to this point, might as well give him a few more games off just to be sure. As for Barnhart, or anyone else on the roster, they're only 9 games deep. Individually I'm not too worried about him. But you probably have a point where in comparison to Garneau, is he really an upgrade? Oh, and don't look now, but Quintana is slashing .316/.458/.579 at A+ Dayton. Yes, I know, he's older than the competition and the small sample size applies.

So if we're talking concessions revenue, 9:45 is probably around the time that stands are ramping things down, certainly for beer sales (if they still shut those down around the 7th inning). It'd be interesting to see in game betting and how different situations affect betting. Is there more action (as a % of total) in close & late situations because bettors have the bets themselves, but there is also the draw in of a close game (ie, a bit more of a dose of adrenaline)? The game also slows down a bit then with pitching changes and deliberate delays in the game flow itself.

I wonder if he is related to Sidd Finch.

Bad lighting.