1984Echoes

Getting too close to my bedtime for my brain to be working properly and come up with my own picks... But I would say this: I think you've got the three "characters" all mixed up. Waltz should be the Scarecrow, Pitt the Tin Man, and Goggins the Cowardly Lion. Just going by your selections...

Nope. Thibodeaux. Willis will fall to our second 1st round pick. At the top of the 2nd: Best WR: Treylon Burks or Justyn Ross or Chris Olave (whoever falls...)

FALSE. She was crawling through a broken glass door with Pence, Congressman, and Senators just on the other side. Trump's insurrectionist supporters were there to murder Pence, Senators, and Congressman. He did NOT shoot into the crowd. He aimed at the fascist infiltrating assassin. She deserved to die.

Sorry to steal yours Randy... but I couldn't resist: Mize with late movement Splitter on fire once again Batters' hang-dog looks

I'm confused.

But does he have the will to succeed?

You mean the fascist fucking scumbag cunt that tried to overthrow our Democracy? She, and anyone who supports her, can go fuck themselves, and rot in hell for all eternity. Right?

A Trump boot-licking sycophant from the old forum.

However... I think Veleno needs to be up sooner rather than later as, again, Larkin's line is the scoring line and there is precious little after that... somehow the Wings are going to have to find more scoring on the 2nd and 3rd lines...

I heard that in the 2nd when the Wings went on a blitz...

Several!

A few comments: Raymond: looks terrific Rasmussen: looks too slow and unable to control the puck like his size says he should Seider: ewww, bad penalty! Nedeljkovic: some of his flopping around (like a porpoise) puts him in bad positions... he looks decent, not great... let's see how he looks after 20+ games with Detroit though...

Lions first win of the season... ? Unknown.

Please disregard this message.

Little to no judgement should be made on a rookie year... Second or 3rd year is when a better read can be made...

Yeah... Not any intellectual honesty there... at all.

People in here have been doing that for years. It's 99% not to discredit. It's for (a) making jokes, or for a laugh, (b) changing a word to offer a different viewpoint, but along the same lines as the original statement, (c) saying the exact opposite of what someone said, with multiple choice of reasons behind that, (d) and yes, sometimes to discredit. But if someone says the exact opposite of what you are saying... that is part of the conversation. You are the one overreacting as if you are mortally wounded by the tactic, rather than continuing the conversation. Even if it annoys you because it is the exact opposite of what you said. For example, I made a post that was NOT an "FTFY", but a straight up post that took your list of "Trump" positives and gave them back in almost the same point-by-point, in a post, with exact opposite viewpoints about how negative in each aspect Trump was. But it doesn't matter what the format of the post is (a "FTFY" that says the opposite, or a straight up post that states the opposite...); it's the content/ intent/ conversation of the post that matters. You seem to be extremely sensitive to a re-wording of your post through a "FTFY"... If I may recommend... Don't be so sensitive about it... but rather understand the content of the conversation and respond to that aspect of the conversation that you deem relevant. Ask esweig... a fellow conservative, how he has responded to the same. He's been whacked with quite a few FTFY's as well. But we all have been. Some with an interesting alteration. Some for a joke. Some with an opposite viewpoint. As for ewsieg: 99% he doesn't respond with indignity but, rather: "I know you think this way but I cannot", or "let's agree to disagree", or "funny, but I cannot stomach...".

That and the complete and total lack of intellectual honesty. Archie Bunker and his request for "only facts" ends up being nothing but a stream of lies that he types out... Forget facts. He wouldn't know what they are if they hit him square in the...

Look in the mirror. Sycophant. PS: Ability is spelled with two "I"'s, not one.

The Sunni-Shia split is how many years old? Around a 1,000? And they can't get past it. I'm sure there are numerous examples... and several that break past 1,000 years. I don't remember the Thebes-southern Greece argument... the Greek city-states had so many... Athens-Sparta, Macedonia-Greece, etc., etc... I sort of remember anti-Thebes from Athens but my memory chips are losing data quickly so I am forgetting more than I can hold onto / or take on new knowledge...

66. And Trump and his minions lost every single one of them because they were full of shit. They had no evidence whatsoever of election fraud. Just Trump BS. Actually, I think it was 1-65 and the one win was not due to fraud but rather that PA didn't follow their state rules to extend the voting deadline... a technicality.

Where's the defense?

I just want to type less. So I'm OK with EDLR. But yeah... he hasn't actually earned that yet...

At the same odds as prior to the system...

I never said anything about EDELR contributing in MLB in 2022.