ewsieg

On the flip side, are lynching's still an issue in the United States and if it happens, are there laws on the books to address it? The 'do your own research' issue aside, I'm sure it's happened. A quick google search gives me an estimate of 3.2 million teachers in the US so again, I'm sure there are some bad apples. That said, your own comment indicates that localities have addressed it by firing some. Likely reprimanding others. Even if you don't see the harm with the law itself, the conservative in you has to see the overreach for something that is at best an anomaly, at least at this point.

It's the poor folks fault though. If they would only buy a Tesla, they wouldn't need to worry about gas prices. (referencing Colbert)

Can someone get this info to Kamala?

Nah, we can hide that increase under 'transitory inflation' talking points for the next few years. 😉

I would like to believe that no one that frequents this site would find this sketch offensive.

Biden needs to have a speech from the Oval in primetime and get ahead of this. Make it clear on a stage that is seen by everyone that Putin is responsible for the surge in energy prices. At the same time, perfect opportunity for him to get his domestic agenda moving again, calling for commitments in Nuclear, renewables, as well as domestic oil/gas. Make a commitment to the left that no new drilling will be allowed, but any open permits will honored for let's say 5-10 years. Give the oil companies a set time to allow them to realize gains on any spending they put in place to help ensure next Winter isn't a sh*tshow. Nationally there is a lot of push for employee's to get back into the office. Not sure if it's the governments role here, but it would be nice to see companies maybe hold off on that to shrink the demand for gas.

I agree it's an overreach, but I don't necessarily understand how it marginalizes gay people. The law doesn't force a teacher not to acknowledge it though, it simply states they can't have pre-determined instruction about sexual orientation or gender identity. This would include heterosexual orientation as well. I personally don't understand the outrage in treating kids like kids and letting them learn about some issues when they are older and better able to understand it. My daughter (12) recently informed me that she is lgbtq as she believes she's pansexual. My first thought 'where is she getting this from' followed by a feeling that I must be doing something right because at 12 years old, 1) she's not oversexualized and 2) looking for the good in everyone. (This is based on her explanation to me of what a pansexual is) I'll be honest, maybe I just don't understand this. If she told me she was gay, I would have probably accepted that as truth as I do believe most gay people know they are gay very early on. But since she said pansexual, I doubt it. Not that I will love her less if she is, but I just have a feeling the next few years may change how she see's everything. It's a confusing age for kids and she's several years past the cut off for the Florida law. I'm not saying boys should be taught to play with trucks and stressed the importance of math while girls must play with dolls and focus on becoming nurses, i'm just saying teach kids they can do anything and let them figure out who they are sexually.

Life would be a lot duller without gay people.

So, am I missing something with this? Is the outrage that someone coined "Don't Say Gay" bill and therefore everyone must hate it, or is there a legitimate issue with the law? For Kindergarten through 3rd grade, schools may not have specific instruction related to sexual orientation. I'm guessing/hoping common sense provides that same refusal to have specific instruction on sexual orientation to kids up here in Michigan. The Libertarian in me wonders why even waste your time with this law as it's for posturing sake anyway, but i'm not sure I understand the outrage, unless that's just the reverse posturing from the other side.

Another thing that might be stupid as well, but note i'm just asking and i'm a peon, but, how much different is it to learn different drone's? That seems like that might be something that could assist Ukrainian's quicker on the battlefield, but i'm sure that would still take some time. Maybe with that though, you pull some Ukrainian drone tech's over into Poland for "training".

A saw a meme where it showed a picture of the Kyiz Convoy and a couple of A-10's with captions like "Oooh, that looks good" and "I'd so hit that." Kind of funny, but it's just a joke. With the full support of the rest of the US forces, yes, the A-10's would have a field day, but especially when you see the Russian issues with logistics, you'd think our leaders wouldn't say such definitive statements understanding that it's not always as simple as seeing tanks and assuming all we have to do is give Ukraine something that attacks tanks.

Last time it snowed hard, I put on a mask as I went out to shovel. Never would have done that before, but over time I got used to it and often found myself in the winter months wearing it as I left a business until I got into my car. I've been maskless for awhile, but my wife's doctor asked us to continue to wear them for now so i'm back at it.

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/russia-ukraine-war-volodymyr-zelenskyy-has-survived-three-assassination-attempts-in-the-past-week/YLJBUVAIHNV53O3G34BWWCNEIY/?c_id=2&objectid=12508870&ref=rss I heard about the Chechen one being subverted due to the FSB, but not the others. I wonder what likelihood that the FSB really is helping Ukraine with these, or is this American Intelligence being used with the condition that Ukraine needs to say the FSB is helping. Seems to be that would put a lot of pressure on the FSB internally within Russia.

I'm fairly confident his words were for internal consumption so my thoughts are pretty much null and void. But I'm definitely not taking him at his word, but the last thing I heard about Putin was his call with Macron where he straight up indicated this is not a peacekeeping mission, but rather he was taking it at all costs. If within a day or two he's now telling international leaders that he feels there needs to be cooperation to return to normal, to me, that would be saying he's looking for a way out.

In regards to the comments from Putin that mtu posted above, I just did a quick look and didn't see the context. I'm wondering if he's speaking to an international community or was that directed to Russian friendly nations/states? If international, that's a great sign. If just his cronies, it means nothing.

Sanctions appear to be helping.

Well, not just the cooling tower, but anything in the area. I'm pretty sure Russia wasn't trying to hit Babyn Yar, but it was awfully close to that TV station they wanted to take out.

Absolutely

I personally see Manchin as a honest player and believe he would vote for her regardless. I just think he's so right of the party, most just assume he's a DINO. I don't see that in Sinema, which is why I agree with you that if no one from the GOP was voting for Jackson, she wouldn't confirm until she got something out of it. She really seems to epitomize the sleaze that is DC. Just one GOP member votes for her and Sinema has nothing to bargain with.

Unless some serious background info comes out, which i'm assuming would have already, Manchin will definitely rubber stamp. Sinema, IMO, won't have any political reason to hold out either, as i'm confident you're going to have several GOP senators, at minimum, vote for her.

My guess is that the only two that he believes are currently strong enough are Trump and Stone Cold Steve Austin.

He's threatening with nukes because he's getting beat up on the world stage and his troops are looking like a second tier army, rather than arguably the 2nd strongest in the world. The fact he's threatening nukes shows just how scared he is.

I agree 100%.

My SOTU thoughts - Boebert is such a waste of a person. - Not just his words, but the unified solidarity from both parties in regards to Ukraine was refreshing. - As he got into the domestic side, he really had trouble getting his ideas/speech out. - When deciding on how to deal with inflation, i'm glad he's going to choose to focus on lowering costs rather than lowering income for everyone. - Fund the police, can't get more in your face towards the part of the party most America's have problems with. - Strategic reserves being used. It's a drop in the bucket. Would have preferred a call to produce more gas/oil while explaining why it's required in this time now. Politically that could have caused a riff as the GOP would have focused on reopening Keystone and that wouldn't play out well on the left. More interested in what the upcoming actions of Biden are here than simply what he said in his speech.