buddha

lol. the opposite of barrington: pilsen.

i wasnt. i assume from your postings that you think they're all racists so the fact that they are would mean you think they're real christians. lol. i think urban christians and rural christians have more in common than you might imagine, even if some vote for trump and some for bernie.

what was your case again? that i dont know "real" christians? i'll let them know. most of them are really racist, does that make them "real" to you?

speaking of grifters, here's rick wilson.

i come into contact with christians all the time. evangelical christians even. half of them are dyed in the wool bernie sanders supporters.

the picture being painted of christians in this thread is of a useful steteotype by people who dont like them. and i am the furthest thing from a christian.

let me watch this season and then i'll decide what i think the lions need next season. i watched jarad goff throw ducks all season long (even at the end when he was better), and spend half the year having zero pocket presence. literally turning around in the pocket and running. after campbell started calling plays he got better in the pocket but he was still throwing ducks amd checking down all the time. i hope he improves next year. i dont think he was good last year, even if he was adequate at the very end.

well sure. its almost like people are people regardless of what political party they support. some are good, some are bad.

i know its not your position, but it is the position of others in this thread. also, lots of churches do all sorts of charitable work. because you may believe that you shouldnt rely upon the state for support doesnt mean youre not charitable or dont care about those more unfortunate thab yourself. the picture that is painted in this thread of christians is based solely on liberal stereotypes. again, im not saying you, but others certainly are.

lol.

and good limousine liberals will still fly in airplanes, drive gas guzzling cars, send their kids to private schools, and move to exclusive lilly white suburbs. people are hypocrites.

yes we should. we also shouldnt lie to ourselves and think were doing these poor minority kids a favor by killing them.

you dont hear evidence refuting a made up hypothetical? of course you dont. its made up.

rangers score so the refs decide to give the pens a 5-3.

the best is the "the ones who will really suffer are the babies". yes, i'm sure they'd much rather have their brains sucked out while theyre still in the womb. that's much more preferable.

actually it's not. its another "mike pence is going to turn america into the handmaids tale" liberal fantasy.

man, the rangers are physically giving it to the penguins. dont worry rangers fans, when the pens start cheap shotting you the refs will do nothing...

as a certified goff skeptic, i would say yes. if he performs well. i just dont expect him to.

i want the best wing athlete. period. this team needs athletes more than anything else. i want smith.

chet worries me. i'd stay away from chet. who will he guard? he'll get bullied by bigs and blown by by forwards. he didnt play well in the ncaas. otoh, if he can nail 3 pointers and can spread the floor, he'll have a shot. but if youre a team in the playoffs, wouldnt you just stick a stocky 6'4 player on him? i dont know if chet could outmuscle a guard in the nba.

the book banning stuff is concerning too.

they can always sell more dead baby parts! /ducks pp does fine with fundraising, iirc.

none of this is true.

i disagree with you on crt but see your point. i agree that the biggest influence will be dem enthusiasm.

i completely disagree. unless the robots are replacing us a generation or two sooner, there will be massive labor shortages, massive pension shortages, massive social security shortages, and massive tax increases on fewer workers to make up the difference. china will cope when 2/3 of its population are unmarried men in their 30s? lets see how that works out for the rest of the world.