buddha

the acceptance speech was even better! he's here to represent love...

igor will take the job.

how do you keep blashill next season?

wings on a back to back on the road against a good team? they never had a chance.

6-2! comeback time!

well....that escalated quickly. amd ned gets pulled again.

seider with the og.

good loss.

i am shocked - SHOCKED - to hear there may be cheating at memphis. next thing you know, you'll tell me kentucky is paying players.

if the lions arent taking a qb this year, then they need all the assets going forward that they can get in order to trade up for a qb next year.

i am regretting taking the over...

i think it was bigger than tigers/yankees or tigers/red sox. it was not bigger than yankees/red sox given the history of those two teams.

there was a big rivalry with the blue jays in the 80s. much bigger than the yankees or the red sox. lee is on the east coast, so i assume all they talk about is the yankees and red sox so it seems more important.

more espn guys mocking willis to the lions.

he played in 6 games at the end of the year after everyone got hurt and the bears quit trying. he was terrible.

i really hope we draft a linebacker or two this year...

he's a guy that ends up playing a lot more at the end of the season when everyone who is decent is hurt.

i hope glenn gets an hc job next season so we can bring back patricia as a dc.

lions continue to get the band back together for the worst defense in nfl history. i'm stunned atlanta beat them to signing teez...

i dont think that money should be equated with speech, so i think that part of the law is wrong. bad politics? for whom? both parties are fine with it for the reasons ive said before. the democrats LOVE it because it allows them to 1) use it to get a ton of money and 2) campaign off it and get their base all riled up that theyre somehow the underdog against the big bad republicans. win-win for democrats. i'll let you smart people deal with the metaphysics aspect. 🙂

the democrats complained a ton about CU in order to fundraise off it. they dont really care and they do just as well or better than republicans when it comes to raising money from big donors, little donors, or corrupt donors. all that doom and gloom about how republicans will now be able to blow the poor democrats out of the water following CU because of their big money interests was all hot air to get headlines. you want to limit big money influence? make it a public campaign, pay for it with tax money, and limit the amount of time for the campaign. make it two weeks. but then the media wont get the ad money so they'll complain about "free speech" rights. the unions wont be able to bankroll democrats and the billionaires will have their time with republicans (and democrats) cut back. so it'll never happen. so now in illinois we're about to have the second biggest monied campaign foe governor between the second richest man in illinois (the current governor) and the stand in for the first richest man in illinois (ken griffin). democracy, baby. feel it.

consider that cherry picked!

just teasing, chas. i think the democrats have more popular positions when it comes to monetary policy, taxing the rich and on most social programs. however, they maintain less popular positions on a whole host of social issues which costs them elections. which is not a criticism of them, per se, because they are usually ahead of conservatives on most issues, but i do think their positions on those issues would prevent them from "landslides" over republicans. america is still a center-right country, imo.

"if everything was "on the level" everyone would agree with me!" signed, everyone.

plus he's french so i'm sure you dont want him.