I’ve already seen comments on Facebook saying Build Back Better was a failure…which obviously hasn’t even passed the senate. Earth 2.0 is full of bots.
How can you carry on an argument if all you are bringing is conjecture without any proof? It’s completely pointless to debate if you can’t back up what is being said.
Generally when you make claims like this, the onus is not on the others to others to back up and fact check. No one is going to take any of this seriously, and instead it just comes across as a Tucker Carlson fever dream.
If Mitch really cared about “letting the people decide”, he would have done the same thing with ACB (which was even closer to an election than Garland was).
I saw also that Sinema and Machin have approved all of Biden’s federal judge nominees, so I don’t see this being any different. Biden will get his nominee with all democrats and maybe a couple republicans.