Tiger337

Nothing is ever 0%! I said near 0. 🙂

I don't know exactly how it should be done, but I agree the challenges are dumb. If terrible calls are made, then just fix it. No need to add some faux strategic challenge.

I will spend zero seconds reviewing tonight's game!

I think that better change soon or they are going to feel it in ticket sales. This season could lose them a bunch of casual fans.

I don't get nearly as emotional about games as I did even a few years ago, but tonight's game has been demoralizing.

They are tied for first place over 157 games. They should certainly contend next year. They should be adding major league talent, not subtracting their best player.

It's been both.

I think trading Skubal would mean throwing away the season. Any team picking up Skubal for one year is going to be all in, so they won't be giving the Tigers major league players. It would be a package of prospects.

Skubal throws a Porcello. 😒

I think there is a near zero chance of that happening.

Skubal was too amped tonight. You could see it even early in the game. Still might be a good result, but hasn't been himself tonight.

Nice play by Sweeney. I was worried about that one.

I didnt watch any spring training games.

It's accurate.

I hope they don't find a way to screw it up. The challenge system they have for other plays is terrible, way too slow. I understand that the ball strike challenges have gone pretty smoothly in the miniors. I would have preferred robo umps the whole game.

I'm thinking more about sequencing or identifying player tendencies. If they are using tech to learn player tendencies and they pitch that way too predictably, I can see where the opposition might catch up to that by changing their tendencies.

The last one makes a lot of sense.

Perhaps, it was an indication that the organization does not treat people well in general and that report brought things to light and got people talking. I am not saying I think that's true. The easiest safest explanation for a slump is random variation. I'm just throwing out the possibility that's is something more.

Actually I can...

Given the moves they made and how little they gave up, they did about as well with their return as could be expected. I was not expecting anything from Morton, Paddack and Sewald. They weren't bad moves, but they I saw them as depth moves which could have possibly worked out. Sewald still might next year if they keep him

I don't think anybody here suggested that they should have traded Clark and McGonigle. Teams rarely have to trade their elite prospects in deadline trades. I personally can see both sides. I understand the Tigers wanting to keep all their prospects and I certainly understand it's not good to overpay for a two month rental. At the same time, I don't believe there is a magic window of opportunity in the future. I see their remaining time with Skubal as an opportunity which may or may not present itself again in the future. I was not pushing so much for deadline deals though. The off-season is a better time to be makking impact deals - either trades or free agents.

The statcast measures are not very predictive for pitchers.

Yeah, if you look beyond ERA, he ranks in the top 30 of MLB starters on every predictive stat. He has been really frustrating, but he seems like a good candidate to turn it around next year.

I agree with Rosenthal. They have a window of opportunity with Skubal. Hopefully, there will be new opportunities if he leaves, but we don't know that.

My thoughts exactly.