Tiger337

But would he still be good in 2025-2028?

The question is whether she will be a better President in 2025-2028.

They heard it from Dan Bongino. Something to do with George Soros.

Yeah, That is probably the best chance of beating him - that people are just tired of him. It is possible that some people who voted for him last time have lost interest even if they don't see through him. So many vote on emotion.

My experience is different. Practically all young people and women I know think he is a joke. Massachusetts is definitely not a swing state though, so we can't help you.

I don't think he is gaining anyone with his schtick. I also don't think people are just now discovering than he's a con and will switch because of it. My hope is that there will be a bigger turnout this year, because I think previous non voters are more likely to vote for Harris. I am somewhat optimistic that this is the case because I believe people wanted someone new and she is certainly a big contrast to Biden and Trump.

He's not. He just makes an occasional cameo appearance.

I don't know if it was 95%, but I think it was at least half. There is no way highly competitive athletes are going watch the big guys take performancing enhancing drugs without punishment and then innocently stay clean.

I don't know. He has been spreading the same BS for over 40 years and people didn't catch on. I am not confident they are catching on now. Harris has a lot of momentum, but that could change quickly.

NY Times Siena poll: Harris + 4 in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin. https://www.realclearpolling.com/latest-polls/election

But now Trump is saying it was Jerry Brown...

Not so good the last three weeks though. .638 OPS in his last 20 games. He was terrible in April, great in May, bad in June, great in July, bad in August so far. So, it hasn't been a linear improvement. And that is fine, but I think it's fair to put him in the under 100 OPS+ group with everyone else.

I agree with that. It's all very subjective and influenced by draft position. At least most of the Tigers on the current list are actually performing well. The only exception is Rainer who hasn't even played yet.

When I used to go to a lot of minor league games, I definitely noticed that the difference betwen fielding in the majors and was minors was very noticeable. Everybody knows about the difference in pitching and hitting but I think the fielding differential is just as big.

The Kamala Krash is a day that will live in infamy

Scaramucci continues to intelligently attack Trump every day.

All of the media is in the bag for Trump. He is worth big money. That is why they have been normalizing him for 9 years.

Give him a break. He has been preparing for a massive rally in Montana. That's a key state for him!

I don't know. Did they ever ever have five in the top 100 at the same time? I know it doesn't really matter since it's subjective and since some top propects disappear from the list when the get time in the Majors.

That is great info. I am surprised he was so open about it. Some teams are so protective of their data that they will not tell you anything at all that might tip off what kind of info they have.

I have a friend who is an awesome 50+ year old runner and she also completly ruptured her hamstring. It's a really difficult injury from which to return. I think it took a a couple months after surgery of being almost totally immobile and almost a year of rehab. She made it back to her pre-injury level which is amazing at her age.

Smiling and laughing makes you weak unless you are talking about how great you are or putting someone else down. That is conservative humor in a nutshell.

I don't know which of these rankings are legit, but it seems that the Tigers have more top prospects than they have had since probably the 70s. They won't all be hits, but the great thing is when you have so many top prospects they don't all have to be hits to improve the Tigers substantially.

He started in 74 with the A's. I first heard him do the Red Sox games from 80-82. He was a geat announcer and hilarious. I don't know why they let him go. Then I heard him do Oriole broadcasts after that. I agree Miller and Morgan were a good team. I thought Morgan got unfairly targeted for being an old school analyst. That's the way they all were back then (and a lot of them still are).

yes, that surprised me too. I thought he had to be older.