Tiger337

He has been an absolute disaster so far.

If they are considered equally bad, then I'll still go with Avila. Avila at least seemed like a pleasant guy (perhaps being too open) whereas Smith came off as one of those people who seemed smug for no reason at all.

Skubal is fantastic. The only question is his durability. He has an extensive injury historyand still hasn't been good for a full season yet. I am however not interested in seeing him traded. It always depends on who they can get in return, but trading established players for prospects at the deadline seems to backfire more often than it works.

I get that you have decided that Avila can not get any credit for any successes from players currently on the team and that any player that succeeds will be because of something Harris did. However, Randy Smith was horrible. The only thing that saved him was Gonzalez not wanting anything to do with Detroit and refusing that stupid contract.

Doing bad in the playoffs would be better than never getting even close to the playoffs!

Smith was worse. Year after year after year of terrible draft picks and pointless trades. I think Avila had a plan and stuck with it, but ws bad at executing it. Smith didn't even have a plan.

It struck me as odd when I saw the line too. Thanks for confirming it. The other thing is you wouldn't expect it from Mize who had never struck out more than 7 batters in a game previously.

yeah, It is definitely noticeable. They have gone from Avila talking too much at times to not giving any info at all. I don't think that works well when your audience is baseball fans emotionally invested in the team.

The new Lance Parrish!

I don't know much about Parada, but those numbers don't look impressive.

I would not consider dating a woman who supported Trump. There would be such a fundamental difference between us that it wouldn't be even worth trying.

Right, K rate only measures rate of contact. It dosn't say anything about power or hard contact. I am not sure that batting average measures anything in particular. It is just familiar stat from our childhood. There are other measures which tell us more about specific batting skills than batting average. If anything, batting average is a mish mash of both contact and type of contact and you can't isolate any skill by just looking at batting average.

I think k rate measures contact skill better than batting average and it also stabilizes faster. I'd never toss any stat, but batting average doesn't have a lot of use for me unless we are talking about runners on base splits.

I rarely look at batting average anymore, but his k% does look good. His BB%, ISO and OPS all look terrible. I don't think it's a matter of re-orienting expectations. The results have just been bad. I am encouraged that his recent results may indicate that he is making adjustments.

In his first year, he was getting credit a lot of development of prospects. When it was pointed out that most of those players were acquired by Avila, the reponse was that they would not have developed under Avila and that player development was a strength of the Harris administration. There seems to be not as much progression this year.

OK, I should have known based on your past posts.

I read it a few years ago. God, it was boring. LOL.

He might have said that it messed him up, but he has not been much different since he left Detroit. OPS+ Detroit 110 OPS+ elsewhere 114 He is still very up and down.

I believe he has about $40 million on option years from 2030-2032 and a chance for a big free agency payoff after that. He'll need to perform at a high level to get all that. Of course, the 28 million guaranteed will set him up for life and maybe that is good enough him. However, I tend to believe that most professional athletes have a competitive drive to be the best at what they do indepedent of money. Otherwise, they wouldn't have made it so far.

It's not really that "curious" though, not in a negative way. If he is good, then he'll be an absolute steal. If he's not, then they lose but not that much. The deal has a lot more upside than downside for the Tigers. I think it's the kind of thing that a mid-market team needs to do if it wants to be able to keep good players for a long time. For Keith, he'll will be set for life even if he fails. If he is good, he'll lose a lot of money,but he'll still be young enough where he can sign a good free agent deal later.

lol, the White Sox.

You aren't the target audience old man.

The Keith deal is a good risk with little downside. I am surprised he agreed to it. He has been awful so far. I know his statcast numbers are not bad, but they aren't good either. Succeeding in the The Majors is realy hard though and it seems to be getting harder for young hitters, not just Tigers hitters. You really can't make any conclusions at this point.

Gullible voters who believe what the media tells them. No doubt voters should be more educated, but most aren't.

LOL New Hampshire