Tiger337

I use twitter primarily for baseball. I seriously do not enjoy politics very much and never have. The Republicans have always thought the Republicans were right about everything and the Democrats have always thought they were right about everything and I rarely saw any useful discussion between the two. Now I see even less, but I have become forced to follow politics the last ten years because of certain individuals trying to destroy my country for their own benefit,

I would be fine with this too, although I fully understand why others would not like it. I went through a period where I was watching all the Tigers games on TV and I enjoyed it, but I started taking it for granted. Now, watching a game on TV is nothing special and I prefer listening to the radio most nights now while I do other stuff. In the old days, I didn't get to watch as many games and being able to watch the Tigers on TV was something special to look forward to. Now, I assume they'll be on and I get irritated when they aren't on for the one night during the week when I want to watch a full game.

"trimming" "certain" "healthcare programs" means gutting programs by firing anyone who is easy to let go and is also part of a demographic which MAGA doesn't like.

I am pretty sure they will add four more teams (which is too many) when they expand but I don't see them adding 8.

The financial stuff that Edman detailed matters in how the transaction was processed (cash deal versus player swap), but I question whether it had much if any impact on the decision to let him go. I would hope it didn't anyway. I think they have the most depth on the 40-man roster than they had in my lifetime and they don't have guys that can easily be dropped now. He's a reliever who may be useful, but probably doesn't have a great deal of upside.

OK, I am there.

So, there is no radio either?

So, I can't watch the game tonight? It seems like I have to log into to the game a different way every night. Then, many times I find out there is no game. It's so confusing. Radio is better except anyway for that guy with the squeaky excitable voice. Bobby Scales

no politics.

How much do you think ratings would have improved if they brough him on in 2021-2022?

He was a good hire, but their ratings are up because they are winning. Fans will tune in to see a winning team regardless of the announcer. A good broadcaster can improve ratings a bit, but I don't believe that Benetti doubled the ratings.

I like Benetti even with his forced humor. I like Dirks. They’re difficult to listen to when they’re together.

Anyone catch this? yeah, Adell did! Also, if he catches the ball before if clears the wall and then falls into the stands, it's an out. It's hard to tell on this one without slowing it down.

Technically, if the starter doesn't go five innings, the official scorer can give it to the pitcher they think deserves it the most.

The bigger question is who gets the W?

He is pitching like a guy who had a a 6+ ERA with three MLB organizations prior to the Tigers and couldn't make the Tigers team in 2025.

Keider Montero will probably be just as good/bad as Verlander. I still feel as if Verlander might be able to get on a roll at some point like he did last year and that would be fun, but I am not counting on it.

That used be the case, but the NL has caught up in recent years. 2023 NL 362 AL 328 2024 NL 369 AL 321 2025 AL 367 NL 353 2026 NL 27 AL 21

I don't think many MLB managers reserve the #3 spot for the best hitter on the team anymore.

32,000 followers, but it's a site I've never heard of before and it has a link to a charity...Could be a legit site, but it is suspicious.

"supposed to"

I think the only time I want to see a sacrifice bunt is in the ninth inning behind by one or tied with a weak hitter at the plate.

I am also not sure how useful it would be for Greene to lay down a perfect sacrifice only to have Torkelson retired on a towering flyball that he "just missed".

I do think if a team ranks better in pct of innings scored than it does in runs scored, then it probably indicates they are relying less on home runs than other teams. I don't know if that's a bad or good thing though.

My question was whether percentage of innings scoring runs in 2025 was more predictive than runs scored in 2025 of runs scored in 2026. I loved seeing it broken out that way (potentially for other puposes), but it didn't seem to lead to a different conclusion than just looking at total runs scored.