Jump to content

MichiganCardinal

Members
  • Posts

    9,579
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    31

MichiganCardinal last won the day on December 30 2025

MichiganCardinal had the most liked content!

Recent Profile Visitors

16,338 profile views

MichiganCardinal's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • One Year In
  • Very Popular
  • Posting Machine
  • Conversation Starter
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

1.9k

Reputation

  1. I come back though to the question of who if not Manu/Vaki? And to get ahead of the likelihood that someone in the ~130 picks after them was good, why didn’t a team take them in one of the first three rounds? This Door #2 fallacy is just Monday Morning QBing in my opinion. If they have two guys they love in the 4th round, I would rather them move to go get them than sit right and take four mediocre players who all get cut by 2026. Compare Holmes’ drafts apples to apples across the league and he’s easily in the top ten. And the comments after draft day are just coach speak. They’re not going to say “yeah it’s round four, so hopefully these guys pan out but who knows 🤷‍♂️ “
  2. I mean… at the distinct risk of sounding like a smart ass…. I think that’s what they did when they drafted a developmental tackle and a special teams role player. Generally I think the expectations of 4th round picks (both Manu and Vaki) are unrealistic. I quickly scrolled the picks after them in 2024, and none jumped off the page. If I missed any, so did 32 NFL teams at least three times. Manu will probably make the team as a backup tackle. Would it have been nicer if he was Mailata 2.0? Of course. But that was probably always a pipe dream. Vaki is entering his second year after a position change out of college. If he replaces Raymond on special teams, that’ll be a good pick. Not every 4th round pick can be Amon-Ra.
  3. Another name to keep an eye on might be Trent Williams if the Niners ultimately release him. Likely? No. But the Lions do have the money and need now.
  4. Teams only need to be under the cap by Wednesday. The Ravens are $12MM over right now, but will extend or restructure Lamar before then to comply.
  5. Lions, Bears, Giants, Browns, and Chargers were considered the Linderbaum frontrunners. Two of those teams have gained a center in the last 24 hours. One of them has lost a left tackle. I think it’ll either be the Lions or the Giants, unless the Browns just throw a stupid amount of money at him.
  6. Have to ponder if that means Linderbaum is officially gone. They’re going to have IOL problems next year.
  7. Bears just traded for Garrett Bradbury out of New England. He’s not very good but if he’s the starter that’s one less Linderbaum suitor.
  8. Well that changes things.
  9. Another week, another master class from The Pitt.
  10. I've come to the conclusion that all of my information (and that of everyone in my generation) is already out there on the dark web if someone really wants it. People shouldn't be reckless with any of their information (and I agree, probably doubly so for sensitive information like medical information). Doxxing is definitely a thing and it's not good. But I don't tend to make online decisions about what the worst of the worst in the world could find. Because it's probably out there somewhere already.
  11. So effectively a 5th round pick, but it's complex. -Rapoport
  12. Could be, but Anzalone was also effectively replaced by Campbell. Jason Kelce played until he was 36, and Ragnow was just as good as him. It's all hypothetical so who knows.
  13. Something I thought of today regarding free agency. In a world where Ragnow never retired, he would be entering the 2026 season at age 30 in the final year of his contract. He would be up for an extension this offseason. In that scenario, assuming he didn't majorly fall off a cliff in performance, I don't think anyone would bat an eye at a market setting three-year / $63MM deal, right in the ballpark of what Linderbaum is probably asking. Am I crazy? I'm not a "the cap is fake" guy. And I don't think the Lions are best served getting into a bidding war for Linderbaum if a team wants to throw $25MM+ APY at him. But with two rookie-contract guards and a LT likely retiring after this season, I also think the Lions do have some money to work with (after restructuring Goff), if they want to be players for Linderbaum or trade for Crosby.
  14. I'd be very surprised by this. I think all signs point to OL being priority #1 this offseason. I don't think it's guaranteed that either of Mahagony or Frazier start in week one, let alone both. At minimum, if a free agent starter isn't brought in I expect a high draft pick would be, to compete and perhaps displace one of them. For instance, if Mauigoa slips, or Lomu is the pick, I expect they could start either of them at guard in 2026 and move them to tackle after Decker retires (maybe flipping Sewell to LT as well). I'm not convinced moving Ratledge to center and starting a 5th round sophomore is that much better than what they did last year. On paper it might even be worse.
×
×
  • Create New...