-
Posts
7,812 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
24
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Store
Articles
Everything posted by MichiganCardinal
-
We won't. But I'm still good with not drafting a QB this year. I don't think there is a point drafting a QB at 2.1 unless we are 100% certain they are the franchise QB. Just as certain as you would be taking him at 1.1... Pick #33 is too high to miss on a pick where you could certainly get a key piece elsewhere, and where a miss on a QB will set you back another 2-3 years while you let him try and fail as your centerpiece (see: Jalen Hurts, Drew Lock, DeShone Kizer, and Christian Hackenburg). Franchise quarterbacks are such a dime a dozen that it is very rare for every team in the NFL to pass on one that has true HOF potential. Not to say that it absolutely can't happen, it almost happened with Lamar Jackson. For every hit on a QB taken in the 30s though, there are far more misses. I would argue the last great QB taken in the second round (as in one who would get universal praise by the fanbase 10-15 years later) was Drew Brees, way back in 2001. Before him, Brett Favre was taken at #33 in 1991. Since Brees, the only QBs picked in the 2nd round who I would even call a serviceable starter in their prime are Andy Dalton (2011), Colin Kaepernick (2011), Jimmy G (2014), and Derek Carr (2014). That's 4/19, not counting Trask. Short of a "this is the next Drew Brees" moment, I think we are far better off going virtually anywhere else. There are enough holes that QB can wait another year, or even two.
-
@RedRamageis correct on my thought process. I was fine with going for it on 4th Down there, I was not commenting on prior decisions. I'm also lukewarm on the play call. I know the QB sneak on a 4th and 1 had failed by like a quarter of an inch earlier, but I still think Jamaal picks up one yard more often than not in that situation. We shouldn't ignore all fundamental coaching decisions because we have a bad team, but we should be viewing them in context. I don't think going for it on 4th and 1 there with this team means that Campbell would have made the same decision to go for it with a 7-3 team two years from now.
-
In the timeout situation, I thought they should have let it run. Up 17-6, I thought they should be happy to take that score to halftime. They took the timeout and it worked. Cool. In the 4th down situation late, I agreed with the call to go for it. You’re 0-10-1. Not to be crass, but honestly. F*** it. You could just envision the punt leading to a game winning field goal as time expired. Let’s try something different! They did and it didn’t work. Damn. That’s that though. These aren’t season defining decisions, nor should they be decisions that we base Campbell’s future off of.
-
The lack of controversy is nice, but I still don't think we will get to see the teams that are not Alabama, Ohio State, Clemson, and Oklahoma compete for championships on a consistent basis without expansion. I also think it would be nice to let a school like Pitt capitalize on their ACC championship, or let a team who surprised with a 10-2 record like Michigan State or Ole Miss attempt to make a run. I am almost certain that at least one team in the 6-12 range of the rankings would have won a National Championship in the last decade if given the opportunity.
-
We should all remember this when the Lions win one or two more and sports talk radio implodes at the notion of picking #2 or #3. 😉
-
I still want to see a 12-team playoff. Power 5 champions get the top five seeds (until the Big 12 finally folds, then just top four seeds). Top four teams get a bye, the best Go5 champion gets #12 seed, everything else is wildcards. Byes: (1) Alabama, (2) Michigan, (3) Baylor, (4) Utah (5) Pitt v. (12) Cincinnati (6) Georgia v. (11) Michigan State (7) Notre Dame v. (10) Oklahoma State (8) Ohio State v. (9) Ole Miss
-
Y’all should enjoy this win. Best weekend for Michigan sports in a very, very long time. #TimeoutGate2021
-
An 81-yard Goff led TD drive right??
-
In a two-point game with under 10 to go in the 4th quarter, Ford Field has begun a wave. The headache…. Make it go away.
-
Does this count as exciting December football?
-
14 points in the first half?? 😱
-
They’ve used that exact formation on multiple past occasions. I’m sure the entire defense knew exactly what Goff was about to do when he audibled to it. Also, this place is VERY empty today.
-
The child will almost certainly receive a life sentence. The only thing I could see changing that is if the prosecutor will offer a small carrot (like life with the possibility of parole instead of without the possibility) to the child in exchange for testimony against the parents.
-
I don't think the parents are blameless. They should live with the full guilt of what their son did, their role in it, and what their role could have been in preventing it, for the rest of their lives. They are not good people and they are not good parents. But they still deserve their day in court.
-
To a certain degree, everything has to be speculation based on what is known right now because there hasn't been a trial, and won't be one for a while. To answer your question, probably not many parents would, but I don't know that the father calling the police and reporting his gun missing, and being concerned that his son was the shooter, creates the criminal liability of involuntary manslaughter. They were staying at a friend's art studio, probably trying to keep the media circus off of their friends and relatives too.
-
According to what Smith stated at the arraignment, McDonald avoided contact throughout Thursday. Then, at 3:00, while Smith is in an unrelated trial, she announces charges and expects the parents to be able to teleport to Pontiac to be arraigned by 4:00pm, without any prior notification. When they can't do that (likely because their attorney didn't know it), McDonald goes and claims they are running and that they are not talking to their attorney, neither of which are true. They speak with their attorney and agree to meet at 7:30am at Novi District Court to turn themselves in and be arraigned, which was then relayed to the prosecutor. At that point, the parents options were to either turn themselves in immediately and spend the night in jail waiting to be arraigned from the jail, or to sleep one more night where they were and appear presentable in an arraignment. In any other case, no one would have batted an eye at them choosing the latter. The Judge did agree with the prosecutor. I disagree with the ruling, and can't help but believe it was swayed - at least in part - due to the media perception spun by McDonald.