pfife

you've had a long day, take a good rest and rise & grind tomorrow champ

looks like we might have a spammer on our hands

So you're admit that 2m number was a crock of shit when you said it right? That's what your second "paragraph" here presupposes.

man you went like 20 whole entire minutes before you ad hom'd. I had high expectations

You literally just posted an argument on vax safety contingent on disclosed FDA documents - you trusted the government 5 mins ago. Also nice ad hom.

I'm too inpatient. I already know how the 2mil number is bullshit. FYI to the team. 2 million illegal immigrants is the number of people WHO WERE APPREHENDED: https://www.borderreport.com/hot-topics/immigration/u-s-officials-come-across-nearly-2-million-unauthorized-migrants-in-fy-2021/ So it's actually the case that 2 million WERE CAUGHT migrating here illegally. I guess that's a thank you brandon if "illegal immigration" is your thing Good god the lies never end with this crowd. One fucking lie after another and they're shameless.

The government discloses those numbers and they're not 2million

it's a bong.

imagine thinking 2 million immigrants crossed the border illegally this year lmao

I read that article - it didn't say how many staff, do you know what percentage of staff it was? I definitely don't know what percentage of the staff it was.

Im going to admit, I really didn't read the new american past the link to the pdf, but when they said it was an FDA pdf, I love me some direct sources so I decided to read a tad for myself. I feel like the new american did not accurately reflect the contents of the pdf. I know I said I like ad hom, but what I just did here was the opposite of an ad hom and now I think Fox owes me at least one heart or trophy because addressed the specific content of his posts and didn't ad hom.

The new american links to this url, which it claims is an FDA document that (even though it's not an FDA URL): https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf Within this document to which the new american links, it says the following: AE= adverse event [begin quote] • Reports are submitted voluntarily, and the magnitude of underreporting is unknown. Some of the factors that may influence whether an event is reported include: length of time since marketing, market share of the drug, publicity about a drug or an AE, seriousness of the reaction, regulatory actions, awareness by health professionals and consumers of adverse drug event reporting, and litigation. • Because many external factors influence whether or not an AE is reported, the spontaneous reporting system yields reporting proportions not incidence rates. As a result, it is generally not appropriate to make between-drug comparisons using these proportions; the spontaneous reporting system should be used for signal detection rather than hypothesis testing. • In some reports, clinical information (such as medical history, validation of diagnosis, time from drug use to onset of illness, dose, and use of concomitant drugs) is missing or incomplete, and follow-up information may not be available. • An accumulation of adverse event reports (AERs) does not necessarily indicate that a particular AE was caused by the drug; rather, the event may be due to an underlying disease or some other factor(s) such as past medical history or concomitant medication. [end quote] Foxy did you read this before you posted it? It doesn't seem to fit your narrative.

hi Foxy Whimsical speaking of disingenuousness did you happen to have those diagnosis codes? also when you were counting covid cases were you including only positive test results or did you also include positive antibody tests? Thanks in advance. I'll be honest I get kinda stoked when I run into someone else that does this kind of work. There's another person on the board that does the same kind of research as us too and I was thinking we should have a secret handshake all of us what do you think

what's gonna be amazing is the ad hom boomerang that comes whipping around the moment this dude calls someone's source biased.

I didn't' admit to disingenuousness but I am definitely biased.

this is probably going to be a record for me getting on someone's ignore list

wow world net daily? And just to head this off, yes I do ad hominem - like a shit ton bro. Not lying dude I think it's a lot of fun

You Nailed it. Obamacare needed the cornhusker kickback.... we need the coalminer kickback

I bet this mf ain't gonna mistake automatic for semi automatic and get DQ'd from this societal convo

I posed one about an actual law they actually passed and you're silent about it, but also thinking everyone owes you answers about something that's not a law at the same time it's honestly backwards that you're mum about the law and loud about the not law especially when everything you're worried about in the not law is way worse in the actual law yet you're silent about it I'm intrigued by your selective application of the concerns

that dude is one of my absolute favorites. I think Naked Gun, Airplane, and Police Squad are some of the funniest ever made... to me. ymmv

c-span callers aren't really a goldmine for awesome sayings, but I did hear a caller say today "I'm vaccinated, I've had 2 and a boo" and will probably be stealing that one

so no answer to the question you quoted? I figured as much but you wasted a lot of letters telling me that