pfife

It's always awesome when someone's argument is totally based in a fantasy world that doesn't exist. This is the same dude that claimed he's "just the facts" but I guess "facts" also mean "a world I made up for convenience of internet argument"

none of this would have happened had the police not shot a dude 6 times but they always get a free pass

It seems like Jonah Goldberg has been ready to bounce all of the trumper shit for quite a while.

except chief MTU was talking about people getting a rush from OTHERS doing that so cool story chief are you thinking about maybe responding to what people actually posted here sometime chief

Yeah but it was clearly demonstrated yesterday that your sources for information are quite suspect, they clearly don't give you all of the information, even though you come here and preach to others to get better sources.

LOL ok chief

fyi according to some the NYTimes is liberal

yep thought about it too and edited and added that it mighta been 2018. Same year they legalized weed.

In Michigan I think it was prop 2 on the 2016 ballot that gave us no excuse absentee voting. Maybe it was 2018....?

so it's both sides because one side did complain and the other "would have" and actually didn't when the coin was literally on the other side (mail in favored GOP)?

It ruins the narrative you think the liberals have chief which is also called a strawman chief

NYPD let's the proud boys ride subway for free. Hmm it's almost like they're on the same team or something. Defund the police.

Lol that law works unless your goal is to keep guns from felons

your loss

Its so awesome that you roll up here with that "ok sign" shit chief LMAO

I see we're to the point of your argument that hinges on the reader being born yesterday. So you admit you consume only biased media that never showed you it. Nice practicing what you preach chief. So yeah all that stuff you said about Brandon was wrong. Glad to help. You shouldn't feign ignorance in the same post you say someone else provides no useful information. lol ok sign

well there were the photos which were pretty solid basis chief

mam this is a wendys

Imagine rolling up and trying to blast people for disagreeing with a verdict and like 10 minutes later, disagreeing with a verdict.

Lets not forget that Kyle Rittenhouse has been photographed flashing white power hand signals. There are media outlets that aren't telling you that and apparently those are the ones you're consuming. Cool lecture though you should try listening to it yourself

tfw when brandishing conservative bona fides overrides the will to make sense

While I totally do always vote for the democrat even though I'm way to the left of them, I don't think it's incumbent upon voters to do that, it's a choice I make for my vote. I think the notion that voters need to suck it up and vote for the democrat on the ballot isn't a winning proposition for democrats. I guess I wonder why we don't try to save democracy with a exciting candidate

I wasn't talking to you specifically - it was a random thought I had in my mind about two sets of arguments I hear. I think it is pretty inconsistent though.

I'm pretty sure I've never heard conservatives disagree with a court decision. https://www.oyez.org/cases/1971/70-18

Are you saying conservatives have different standards for conservatives vs non conservatives when it comes to disagreeing with verdicts? I think its safe to say I have a hard time believing that because they never ever have standards for thee and not for me