pfife

Also nice admission to posting anti-semetic videos.

Cool excuse if you don't know how videos and the internet work

Also intriguing is that your posting of anti-semitic videos also decreased since the debate so using your logic............ you sure did step in that one

at least the posts relying on polls had a facade of empiricism, now you're just stone cold vibing which I remember you hated before too

LOL at MAGAtownBUMMERS, when not posting anti-semitic video after anti-semitic video, is posting poll result after poll result to support his "argument" now posting that the only poll that matters is the one on election day. pretty hilarious **** hoss

CSPAN always has these people call up with crazy ideas about what should happen, and this was no exception but it did start making me think about some weird civics questions. This dude said they should put Obama as VP on the ticket. He said Obama can't run for the top job but can run for VP. Is that true? IDK. If it isn't true, does that mean Obama or any former president really can't accept any job that is in the line of presidential succession? Couldn't be speaker of the house, couldn't be president of the senate, etc etc etc

Sen. Mark Warner seeks to assemble group of Democratic senators to ask Biden to exit race https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/07/05/mark-warner-joe-biden-exit-race-democratic-senators/

haha that's awesome. Welcome, btw. I get the impression you're on the conservative side of stuff and we tend to run conservatives off so hope you stay and fight about politics with us. We're not very nice all the time though Also my experience is that a copy and paste into the textbox on the site retains the source formatting. For headlines it's actually kinda cool.

If they sent it back that means they didn't decide the specific of the cases by definition, and instead they gave a rule for the ages for the lower courts to follow. Which is what they said they were going to do in oral argument. Which is what I said they said in oral argument.

I don't think much of anything as been scheduled for months, since this went to the DC court, but honestly I'm not sure. I'm fine with deferring to you that it should have already been done, I don't have that expertise.

So are you decrying that she didn't do an evidentiary hearing.... yet?

No they really did say thar. Sorry.

They actually in their own words in oral arguments, disregarded the facts of specific case and claimed they were making a rule for the ages. I'll take their word for it.

It means there's actual rule of law compliant reasons why chutkan can go faster which you decried earlier.

The hearings with think tanks like it's cspan or something

The nature of the evidence us also very different between the cases, Chutkan isn't dealing with top secret classified documents.

Cannon is having hearings inviting 3rd parties not even affiliated with the case. Hard pass on that.

If we learn the most basic lesson from yesterday, you don't win what you don't pursue. More power to AOC. Hashtag dts

If I'm understanding Biden correctly he says he's going to voluntarily limit his own power. For some reason.

Getting less ok with this decision than I was earlier.

So like 0% of this ruling is in the words of the constitution, no? More textual healing from the Federalist society

Well let's not get crazy. This may be the exception to the rule lol

I think the thing they've argued before is that election integrity is an official act/policy area. It's obviously a stretch that they're engaged in election integrity work but with these courts who knows. No doubt it will be litigated and thus delay.

It's very possible that we've effectively been living under presumptive immunity for official acts for quite a while. The Obama drone strike example leveraged in the oral arguments is an example.

I very cautiously agree with the notions presented by CMRiv and Oblong that the ruling kinda sorta makes sense and could be OK