TigerNation

He was hitting .197 with a .725 OPS through the first 33 games too. Gotta be what, a 13+ WAR pace over the next 100 then?

Detroit replay guy gotta be drunk.

I for one welcome Meadows turning into the GOAT.

In his 17 games since coming back he's got a 174 wRC+. That's basically a 10 WAR pace with his defense and base running. If only it was remotely sustainable.

The mic at the plate is so juiced.

I'd assume heavy preference would be given to somebody who hits from the right side.

No.

Yeah Riley Greene is really at risk of being non tendered.

The takeaway is that KC is and has been a fraud all year. They won't win more than 75 games next year despite having an 8+ WAR SS.

You can see the easy power and why he was looked at to be a 40 HR guy. Hopefully they can figure out a way to fix him.

Let the bullpen take it from here.

.868 OPS vs RHP this year. I'm guessing the hope is he can at least hit well enough to be the platoon starter for 120 games or so. Try to platoon our way to 0 WAR at the SS position.

2 of them HRs, and most importantly only a 20% K rate.

Curious if they found some type of adjustment to his swing that has resulted in the huge decrease in Ks. He had never had a K rate lower than 28.8% in AA or above, and was at 31.2% last year. It's incredibly rare to see a 10% reduction but he's managed a 20.3% rate over 301 PAs this year. And that is a large enough sample for a stat like K rate to stabilize somewhat. Obviously expected it to go up, but you can at least see some hope for a K rate around 25%, whereas before you'd have to be drunk to expect him to manage a K rate under 30% against MLB pitching.

Worth noting that their #4 and #5 on MLB, but the Fangraphs they are #7 and #19. And the Fangraphs rankings are much more appropriate based on their scouting reports and performances to date.

I think Norby kind of sucks as a prospect, and don't see how him slotting into LF would be all that helpful. He would be a nice player to have as depth and maybe a 4th/5th OFer. I don't see him as providing anymore value than what Perez has done this year. He'd be behind Greene, Carpenter, and Perez as it stands today for the corner OF spots. Basically nothing more than competition for Malloy and Perez for spot duty. Would be very disappointing to get that quality of prospect as the headliner in the Flaherty trade. In comparison to the Dodgers trade, I would not trade Rushing for Norby and Bradfield straight up.

Bradfield has a .098 ISO as a 22 year old in A+. There is far too much projection and development needed for him to be the top prospect in any trade for Flaherty. He'd be intriguing as the second player paired with a top 100 prospect.

Pass on that Baltimore deal. Id take the Dodgers, Rushing is the level of prospect we should aim for as the headliner for Flaherty.

Greenberg is the GM, not Harris. IDK what exact duties they each have, but it may well be Harris is not even the one negotiating the deals directly.

If we're trading Perez it would have to be like the Paredes for Meadows deal. Trading him for a more established, higher level player. That trade obviously backfired terribly, but that would be the archetype. I don't see that as all that likely.

Not a jab, just explaining the difference between the two list.

And apparently it's impossible to add an .800 OPS hitter. The Tigers already have three hitters in Greene, Carpenter, and Keith that could all be .800+ OPS guys next year, but because they don't have a 4th they are years away from being competitive.

Because your list shows unqualified hitters.

His post is complete nonsense and shows that he clearly hasn't actually looked at the public ally available stats and is simply operating based on feelings.

Unless they are speaking with inside info, it would certainly be surprising not to see Rainer play. Both Clark and McGonigle played last year.