The draft is a mixed bag for me. The first two picks were horrible in terms of positional value. But this is question for their judgement. They did not like the defensive ends/tackles/corners after Anderson and Weatherspoon were gone.
And look at the the consensus draft boards vs how the draft went. The draft pundits were way off.
Branch and LaPorta are good meat and potatoes picks. Increase the talent level and fill positions of short and long term need.
The Western Kentucky Kid and the OL from William and Mary kid are the picks where you find a James Houston type. It's totally based on a workout or a conviction from a guy in your personnel department. They are exactly the kind of picks you make later in draft. Both guys could bust; one could be a contributor. At this point, it's how you develop players. And they have proved that they can develop guys they draft.
And I love the fact that Holmes was willing to go up and down the board looking for opportunities to get more picks. Getting a 2025 4th is significant even if it doesn't give you value for 2 years. It can be moved in future trades.
Don't forget they have a 2024 3rd for Hockenson.
They want nothing to do with guys they didn't draft.
Pretty clear they did not like the edge players or corners after Witherspoon and Anderson were gone.
I disagree strongly with the positional value of the players they took. But all you have to do is win a terrible division and establish more credibility. Nobody cares unless you fail.
The #1 criticism of the Avila regime was no depth. When Greene and Tork didn't produce immediately, it exposed how little we got from the scorched earth tank job.
If you are basing the trajectory of the rebuild on Tork and Greene, then you are going to be disappointed; Or you are Al Avila and unemployed.
It was already asking a lot and they were clearly not ready to carry a team into the next phase on their own.