Jump to content

4hzglory

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    264

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by 4hzglory

  1. 4hzglory
    LOL, they confused Bally too as when Harold came up, they had him listed at SS
  2. 4hzglory
    So the original lineup put out had the 2 switched.
  3. 4hzglory
    Well I'm not sure. It was the short stop and I thought Harold was playing Short based on the thread, but the MLB app says it's Willie
  4. 4hzglory
    It was actually Harold.
  5. 4hzglory
    And considering the rate to "buy" an expansion team is $2 billion, that should mean every one of those teams is actually worth at least $2 billion
  6. 4hzglory
    Or they finish 1st and 2nd and they get 2 picks 🤪
  7. 4hzglory
    I don't think it's as simple as this with the new CBA. If they think they are close to ready, even if their stats in the spring don't show it, I think they will start them in Detroit. If they struggle for a month, they will send them down. The benefit of potentially getting extra draft picks sways things. Add to that that they may not get the extra year of control even if they wait to bring them up, I think you will see teams err on the side of pushing a bit compared to before trying to get the extra control.
  8. 4hzglory
    Supposedly they were willing to give Adams the same deal but he wanted to leave. Be careful what you wish for.
  9. 4hzglory
    Bey with 21 in the first.
  10. 4hzglory
    They wouldn’t have had Chubb. He was part of the trade package. Chubb, Top corner Ward, 3 number 1s and a number 2. It’s funny that there’s was the only trade package publicized and he didn’t pick them.
  11. 4hzglory
    They would only assume Watson’s current $35 mil base salary. They could restructure to a $1 mil base and $34 mil signing bonus which would spread the $34 mil over 3 years making his current hit at $12.33 mil (1 mil plus 11.33 mil from the bonus) that makes the next 2 years hit $11.33 mil higher but they can deal with it later.
  12. 4hzglory
    And the Saints are right at the cap. It shows that you can get creative if you need to. It pushes it back to later (which the Saints have done over and over) but it can be done.
  13. 4hzglory
    $2.5 mil with incentives could be a $1 mil base if he doesn't play.
  14. 4hzglory
    And the new cba definitely gives them incentive to have Greene and Torkelson on the roster day 1, so Greene is likely committed to consistent time.
  15. 4hzglory
    If they don't designate him it actually means 100% of dead money is this year. If they do post June 1, it is split between this year and next. Only thing about the post June 1 is they don't get the cap relief until then per HongBit's post
  16. 4hzglory
    So does this mean the subcommittee was going against the rest of the players wishes prior to this? At least a deal is done and we it is going to be a crazy month!
  17. 4hzglory
    No more 7 inning double headers or runners on 2nd to start extra innings.
  18. 4hzglory
    https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2022/03/mlb-mlbpa-reach-new-collective-bargaining-agreement.html
  19. 4hzglory
    And the trainer quoted in the article (from MLB so take that with a grain of salt) is for the draft.
  20. 4hzglory
    https://www.mlb.com/news/international-draft-cba-negotiations So the aggregate bonus & for the 20 round international draft (600 players) is more than was spent on over 1000 players in the last period prior to the pandemic. So the international prospects would actually get more $ overall. No team could pass on a selection. They expect $21-23 million more to be spent on international players with this system.
  21. 4hzglory
    And from the initial reports, the first picks bonus was higher than any bonus received from this year's signing period. They were set bonuses based on slot, but overall the bonuses to all drafted international players were for more $ than the $ paid to the same amount of players in the last international period.
  22. 4hzglory
    Like the revenue sharing and floor, hate the hard cap. I'd rather see a lower soft cap with only financial penalties so an owner can choose to go over if they want and that tax gets spread to the other teams. I really dislike the draft pick/international pool penalties.
  23. 4hzglory
    I could also say the same of some of the gains made by the players. I was responding specifically to Lee's post.
  24. 4hzglory
    Agree
  25. 4hzglory
    You are definitely right on the expanded playoffs. Some of the others can be debated if they are better for the owners or the overall good of the game
×
×
  • Create New...