Jump to content

Longgone

Members
  • Posts

    1,083
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Longgone's Achievements

Mentor

Mentor (12/14)

  • Very Popular
  • Posting Machine
  • One Year In
  • Reacting Well
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

323

Reputation

  1. He does have great hair.
  2. The broadcast issues are those that can and need to be solved by the owners, not at the table. The owners know they're not getting a cap and aren't going to die on that hill.
  3. These are mostly old issues that have been proposed, discussed and tweaked for decades. There is no large precipitating issue that should lead to an impasse. We are dealing with human beings, however.
  4. Why do you think this? I don't see any huge, must have, hot button issues on either side, like there has been in the past, that would lead to a bitter stand off.
  5. Yes it is, I was responding to op saying he's only done short term so far.
  6. You are correct, it doesn't prove anything, remains to be seen.
  7. And it disproves any notion that Harris is unwilling to make a long term commitment to a premium player.
  8. That wasn't a premium, long term commitment.
  9. Yes, I do, but it will have to be a player on which Harris is totally convicted and fills a big hole, not simply who is available.
  10. Like everything in life, it depends. You trade if you get back more organizational value/fit than you give up. Myself, I would lean more towards accumulating young, ascending players, and less on older, descending ones. I also admire a GM who has the patience and discipline to wait for players on which he has full conviction, and not panic and settle for what's available to address immediate perceived needs.
  11. They are only two votes, and it's more likely than the players ever agreeing to any salary inhibitions. MLB is the anomaly in this regard for US sports leagues. LA and NY have no revenues without the other franchises to play against.
  12. For heavens sake, just share equally all broadcast revenues, you don't even need the CBA to do that. Without the gross revenue imbalance, more teams will compete for free agents.
  13. Trading a 30 year old pitcher, who will require a long term, mega contract, for a haul of young talent, and then using that financial wherewithal to invest in other needs, diversifying your risk, makes sense.
  14. Sure looks like they’re betting on Colt Keith.
×
×
  • Create New...