Jump to content

Longgone

Members
  • Posts

    1,014
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Longgone

  1. The whole raison d’etre for rehabbing these veteran players and flipping them at the deadline is to add to your pipeline. This failed to achieve that. The accomplishment of restoring him to a valuable asset was wasted.
  2. I’ll give him a C; A for acquiring and fixing him, F for the return he got flipping him.
  3. Jansen was better than Kelly when Kelly was injured. He is not better than Kelly now. In any trade, try to get some upside, even if they are far away, not org fodder.
  4. That is a very weak return, very little upside, especially compared with what Boston gave up for Jansen.
  5. How did a major league club ever employ him as their GM? Or Dan O’Dowd for that matter.
  6. I’m not commenting on the equity of the proposed deal. I am saying a prospect the caliber of Holliday (and there are very few) must be included and you can’t just substitute quantity.
  7. Baltimore has a lot of good prospects, but Holliday is in a class above and would be a superior get.
  8. Navigato is basically an org guy, he goes where they need him, and if he has any chance to make the show, it will be as a utility player, jack of all trades
  9. It’s okay, stick with your baseless agenda. it’s fine to be critical of someone, but it’s better to deal in reality rather than just bitter venom.
  10. This is pure ignorance. No one is signing anything, until it is done. You want to blame Harris, yet you got nothing. The agent was trying to squeeze the Dodgers, they wouldn’t meet the abrupt, last second demands, no blame for them?
  11. Harris never blamed anyone or made any excuses. And no one puts these things in writing, it just isn’t how things are done, generally things are done with integrity, because reputations linger forever. No agent is going to sign off on any leverage they may have until a deal is in place.
  12. He did, and the agent turned around and ****** him at the last minute, reneging on an agreed upon deal.
  13. This is true of most any player at any time; if you get the right offer, you make the trade.
  14. Probably all but Siebert and Davis
  15. Actually, if the first two happen, they would probably acquire an actual first baseman.
  16. If Keith can hit like a first baseman and play a below average second base, leave him at second. If he can’t quite hit like a solid first baseman, then it would be stupid to move him there. If he doesn’t at all have the hands or movements of an infielder, for heaven’s sake, don’t assume he can handle first.
  17. Hey, if he can hit like a first baseman and play second base at all, leave him alone!
  18. Yes, sorry, I was overreacting to others
  19. If you want the opportunity for a future star player, you’ll target top minor leaguers, if you’ll settle for mediocrity, then insist on only major leaguers, because no one is giving up a star major league player. Sure, there’s more risk, but build the team with highly competitive players, not average ones.
  20. I could see them falling for a Theo Gillen, for the bat.
  21. A) Pro rankings often differ from media rankings. B) Fangraphs rankings are often a little wonky. C) Waldschmidt is an ascending player and climbing the boards.
  22. Mayo won’t cut the mustard, except as a secondary piece.
  23. You are not going to get an elite pitcher unless you are willing to give up elite prospects. Kjerstad won’t cut it.
  24. Not if you keep it refrigerated.
  25. The best thing that could happen to MLB would be for them to take over all the broadcasting rights.
×
×
  • Create New...