SpaceX is tasked with the lander for Artemis III but NASA recently opened up the option for someone else to do it. Artemis II, which will go around the moon in a free return trajectory rather than Lunar Orbit, doesn't involve SpaceX. I would not bet $500 of my own money that we land on Artemis III.
That's what makes me laugh about the "We can land a man on the moon but we can't...." trope. It was extremely costly and took 400,000 people to do that. In 1966 NASA was 4.4% of the budget. In 1968 before we flew a manned Apollo mission, they already cut productions of the Saturn V rockets, 15 total. 2 were kept for Museums and 1 was used for Skylab, 2 were unmanned. If JFK didn't die when he did there's some that think we never would have even done it. The drive to do it came from him issuing the charge and then getting assassinated. Congress couldn't wait to pull funding from Apollo.
And we're finding out it's not that easy even with modern technology.
We're never going to Mars. I don't see it. Check... maybe someone will attempt to go, but they won't land.