if you are talking about NYC that paradox is part of what they were talking about. Coumo won the working class. But Mamdani ran the 'modern' media campaign that ended up reaching enough people to overcome Coumo's money and media advantage. One interesting thing in the discussion was not he details of political positions but evolution in how to use media to win an election in today's environment where saturation TV advertising is showing itself ineffective more and more often. The other aspect is whether the party knows how to find the candidates that will function well with newer media systems. The complaint is that the standard party approach is see who can raise the most money early and assume that is your most viable candidate. But that is exactly what gets you a Coumo. I really see that now in the emailing I get constantly since I'm on a bunch of Dem mailing lists. They all go to trash but it's still interesting to see the only thing they are after is money - there is almost no appeal to why anyone should care if they are elected, But every candidate is hustling to prove they can raise more money a year and a half out because they know that's what gets them labeled as 'viable', whether they actually have high level campaign skills or appeal or not.