gehringer_2

IDK, but at a minimum the CSA army wasn't defending their home turf at Gettysburg.

At one point there was a report that Parker still talks to him everyday. I hope that's true. "I developed a condition that prevents me from playing baseball but allows me an otherwise fairly normal life" is a lot better than "I developed a condition that continues to get worse and will destroy my normal life." I don't know that anyone has ever said which he's dealing with, which is their right of course......

And the Met have a zillion bucks coming off the books this off-season.

Petry is just sad to watch. He knows what to do but just fails. He sets up on a guy, the guy goes right past him, he goes into the corner, the other player comes out with the puck, he tries to pass, it doesn't get there, he's near the man in front of the net, the man makes the play anyway. I can understand why a coach likes him, the instincts are there, but at some point execution has to matter.

Yield curve sill looks goofy.

Haven't focused that much on Gus's individual play, but so far he and Johansson look to me to be doing better than Petry and Chairot. I am liking the way Edvinsson can just smother rushing wingers.

LOL - I had one employer once where you had to navigate a fairly arcane website to get to your paycheck statement and once you got there it was a locked PDF you could look at but not download! This was back in the day when there was no "print to PDF" option in any browser. if you didn't have a license to the full version of Adobe Acrobat with Distiller ($$$) on your computer you just had to print and file a hard copy.

Maybe not so high tech. I'd start with the Dems finding a left handed version of Rush LImbaugh to sit on low tech afternoon AM radio and pull tradesman away from RW talk radio.

The one perfectly valid tactical criticism of the Biden admin is that they could have revised the criteria for asylum from the get go and that would have cut down the flow a great deal - maybe defused the issue by 2024, but they would not do it because it's a hot bottom for the left side of the party. A choice was made to keep the party together on the issue if possible. That is another reason the GOP was willing to see the bill go down to defeat and the Dems wanted the bill so badly - it would have given the admin cover with the left for tightening the asylum process - which they eventually had to do anyway. Those are just some reality checks for how policy evolved. Did any of it make a difference Tuesday? Who knows? The exit polls I saw weren't rating immigration as that high on the list, but it's possible R voters who were willing to believe illegal crossings were down believed if the Dems won they'd relax it again. But again, looking at the numbers the problem wasn't that the Dems didn't reach GOP voters, it's that they didn't reach their own, so I don't know if spending a lot of time post morteming about how the Dems didn't reach GOP voters answers the most important of the Dem's problems. Or you take an alternate line and say that to win the Dems need to jettison a portion of the Obama/Biden electorate that is too unreliable or too sexist and recruit ex-repubs to replace them. That would mean trying to become more a center than center left party. The party was in that space once under Bill Clinton, but whether today's Dems have a positive or negative view of Bill, most Dems reject his GOP-lite policy approaches, so not so easy.

If immigration numbers drop way off or they start deporting people in an already tight labor market where workers have leverage, attempting that should be interesting. OTOH, if Trump's tariffs cause a recession and unemployment, employers will be golden.....

They moved the puck better against a not very good team but man, they need at least one more Dman who is not an outright liability.

Grew up in Detroit, I hate A^2 tap water! (TBF, it's because we are so close to the treatment plant our water is over-oxidized)

'Filtration' terminology is used sloppily out in the real world. You do not 'filter' DS. 'Filters' remove solid particles. Some filters remove very small particles but still solid particles. Sort of by definition a filter does not remove DS, because --- it's dissolved - no particles at all. To stop dissolved ions you can move from a filter to a membrane - i.e. Reverse Osmosis removes DS. While it could be done I suppose, I haven't seen a Fridge with an RO. Just to confuse things there are also membranes used for very fine particle filtration - but they don't remove DS either. But you can also exchange one ion for another, which is what a zero carafe does. That's not 'filtration' either, it's ion-exchange. It's loaded with two ion-exchange resins. One to swap out cations like Na, Ca for hydrogen ions, and the other to swap out chloride or other anions for hydroxyl ions. The hydrogen and hydroxyl combine to produce water, which is non-conductive, whereas the NaCl or whatever DS was in the water initially is conductive. Thus the ion-exchange reduces the conductivity, which is what the meter reads and calls DS. RO also reduces conductivity because the anions and cations simply don't pass the membrane. There are other differences but a major one is that an RO membrane will last a long time if it's not physically damaged, whereas the ion exchange resin eventually runs out of the replacement ions it was charged with and needs to be replaced. In larger ion-exchange systems the resin may be regenerable - e.g. a water softener (totally different resin/exchange system in a water softener however.....) Fridge filters are usually just particulate filters plus activated carbon, which removes mostly organic contaminants and can also tie up chlorine - actually Cl2 mostly reacts on the surface of AC and turns in to ordinary chloride ion. (The zero carafe also contains activated carbon in front of the ion-exchange resin). Chlorine removal by AC won't result in any reduction in DS reading - in fact it would produce a tiny increase. The carbon may trap a few other heavy ions, but basically only reduces DS by accident. I can't say there aren't any fridge filters that do ion-exchange like your carafe, but I know many or maybe most do not. For sure I've never seen one available for a fridge I've owned. So tl:dr, it's not unexpected that your fridge filter, which is likely just a particulate filter plus AC, doesn't reduce DS. It that is the composition, it wasn't designed to.

Petry playing some putrid hockey tonight. I can't imagine what SY was thinking he was going to get from JP this season.

Petry tried to give up a goal at about 17:30, but failed even at that.

Yup. But a little like Nixon in '68, the Clintons had a lot of chits they could call in. The fact is that both parties have too narrow a nominating base and that can lead to candidates that generate a lot more energy in the party than in the general public. If someone knows the answer to that, they can go make a lot of money consulting on the beltway.

The Dems lost with Hillary and decided it was a fluke rather than a property of their electorate, so Biden doubled down with Harris. If you believe that leadership means getting out in front of your public and bringing it along, that was not necessarily a mistake ethically even if it may have turned out to be tactically. But the point has been made that if that was the plan then Biden had to give Harris at least as much or more profile in his admin that Obama gave Biden, and it was never even close. One can also argue that if it was foreseen that a win was so critical in '24 and the Dems were absolutely set on a woman, then pick a white woman and least save your self that half of the battle. In any case, there are a lot of way to slice and dice this history on the continuum of what should have been done in 2020 that cast the die for '24. But the other factor is that I think a lot of people thought Trump would either have gone away to jail or at least gone away instead of holding his grip on GOP. Everybody needs to suck it up, go find someplace to use your efforts help build US civil society for the next few years and make a contribution to holding it together.

They wouldn't go blue but probably a lot of them did stay home or not vote the top of the ticket, which should have been enough. If Trump was down 3 million and even a third of Harris/Biden deficit was defections to Trump that means Trump lost closer to 10M of *his* 2020 voters. That may well be a lot of the Haley voters.

So aside from never nominating another woman, the Dems apparently need to find a way to effect a culture shift in the coalition.

I don't know if black and Hispanic men made up 20M of the 2020 vote, but the pre-election polling was that there is where at least a chunk of the weakness was. Makes you think the 1st woman president is going to have to be a Republican.

If you assume from the drop in D votes for Harris that at least some % of Biden voters moved to Trump and Trump still got fewer votes than in 20, that means the fall off in maga land evidenced in the half empty rallies and the number of GOPer that came out for Harris was real. So the election was there for the taking but the Dems lost 20M Biden voters. Hard to fathom. The fear on the blue side was always that the Dems could duplicate 2020 but somehow Trump could win by energizing more white guys to come out, but that does not appear to be what happened at all. Most straight up conclusion is that Obama's democratic coalition had a lot more people who won't vote for a woman than won't vote for a POC. More misogynists than racists. I guess there is a certain logic to that on the blue side but it's still disappointing

if he starts to lose it are we more likely to get President Musk, President Vance, or President Jr, or even Ivanka/Kushner? They say they are out, but blood has always been thicker than water among Trumps.

this. The US has a much better chance of surviving Trump than Ukraine does.

Seems to be the case for parts of the Hispanic community

Gavin Newsome, if there is a '28