gehringer_2

if you want a clue as what Yzerman may have been thinking consider that QH has 57 blocks, 5(!) hits and 20 takeaways for the season while Simon has 104,63,18. In giving up Simon you are not just giving up a good young player - you are giving up a player that is providing exactly the what Wings teams have been the most short of for the last 10 yrs and have had to work the hardest to get back. If the Wings were not a team that has been chronically short of toughness since he got here, I could see Yzerman being more willing to give some up for Hughes.

whose side are these jokers on?

maybe the only play other than maybe investing overseas because that's the other kicker - the way they are trying to force the Fed into easier money increases the odds of losing control of inflation - if inflation goes up, higher interest rates will have to follow and any kind of long term bond gets hammered.

LOL - well if Trump didn't like Walz as governor of MN, he sure isn't going to like Amy. And TBH, probably not that big a sacrifice, Trump has driven his chances of beating Klobuchar to pretty much zero. Good statement though.

QH for Edvinsson - assuming that trade was available, would only have been a good move if Hughes was signed -- and if he is set on joining his brothers (which granted, we don't know for sure) he wasn't going to sign with Det.

In addition, the bubble in stock prices is very maldistributed. We've had a huge run up in a few now huge tech stocks that are at crazy valuations and imposssible P/Es, while the rest of the market is pretty meh. Probably won't make a difference if the tech bubble pops everyone will get hammered.

yup. Also more generally there is a lot of investable wealth chasing relatively few interesting investment opportunities - increases herd behavior and volatility in general.

well, judging from the abandonment of diamonds in MI, baseball is doing it's best to match that.

probably true, but I still think if Yzerman was going to deal he would have been able to make a better one if he had already pulled the trigger. Costs will only go up toward the deadline. Of course, the thing with Yzerman is that the current absolute silence might be the indication is he working something.....😉 The only other thing that bears - IMO, is that at least early in his tenure, Yzerman would always talk about wanting to build a team that can win a cup, not just get to the playoff. If he still believes that, I don't see him giving much of anything up to make this team marginally better when it still is too far away from actually being able to win a cup. Of course the flip side is that the pressure to at least make the playoffs only grows each season they miss.

except that this year he probably doesn't even need the marginal addition to get in, unless they lose Sieder or Edvinsson.

The TV market is apparently tiny. I find that ironic because the evolution of the hidef 16:9 format and the relatively few in game breaks has made hockey the best TV viewing sport of all.

the phrase is attributed (likely wrongly) to Baron Rothschild, "when there is blood in the streets, even if it's your own - BUY"

As I have thought about it, I think that whether implicitly or explicitly, the treatment of service time in arbitration is exactly what Skubal and Boras are making an attempt to change. Skubal, as a leader in the MLBPA, wants to argue about fairness and Skubal's real value. The Tigers - representing ownership, are going to argue for the status quo approach to service time cooked into current arbitration practice and that any break from that is an issue for the next CBA and not something that should be upset by a single arbitration panel decision. Personally, I think a system where players get paid more in line for what they are doing present tense and less about what they did 5 yrs ago is fine in theory, but it's not clear to me how to get there since too many teams probably couldn't afford their young stars on that basis.

true. Ed didn't give us much detail in his hypothetical - that's the kind of thing there may or may not be rules about when a real situation arises.

I kouldn't help myself.

I might not protect Torres. He's expensive and he's one and done, so he might not be that interesting to an expansion team - depending on how/what they are trying to build.

also - they noted the other night that Casper was leading the team in hits - I can understand the young guy trying to prove himself to his coach and team mates that way, especially if the points weren't coming easy, but I wonder if it became a bit of a trap for him. Probably not what he should have been spending so much of his focus on.

so are they putting charging outlets on both sides of cars as well? The only EV I've driven had its outlet on the left.

ah so it was WM that went up one. I remember they had reordered the system but forget which way. What I remembered was one group of guy got promoted to the same place they were which was pretty different, so it was WM to WM not Erie to Erie.

who swapped with west Mi? Thought it was Erie....

Didn't the Pac-10 have lousy viewership? And that's what's been imported into the B10?

He may be a great golfer but he will need sports writers who can write copy that makes more sense than that headline.

that is maybe the one part of the common perception about climate change that lacks nuance. Climate change almost certainly means things will get worse for most, but not necessarily for all. There will be places where climate may improve - in particular some places have been arid for the last cycle may become less arid - that is one chance among the generally unknown futures possible for the Pacific Southwest, and given enough CO2 production, Greenland could one day live up to its name. The problem is that the economic, social and political cost, upheaval and chaos that will accompany the migration of maybe half the population of the planet from where it is now to those places people will still be able to make a living is incalculable. The climate doesn't need to kill us, famine and disease driven by wars between winners and loser in the climate lottery will do that.

Maybe because of all the higher ed chaos coming from the gov they are too distracted, but I did expect that by now some kind of vision or leadership would have emerged somewhere in the AAU group around designing a sane future instead of just getting ping-ponged around between media demands and court decisions all the while carrying the cost load while everyone else takes home the $ they have to raise. And the current board of regents at UM lead the disappointment. The academic athletics world is swirling and they install a care-taker president and care-taker football coach when they could most use leadership that would be in place long enough to have a vision and implement it.

was Erie still A+ then? By the numbers the big production drop was going to AA so if you were seeing it at A+ he really wasn't close!