gehringer_2

There are several things I look for in Regents elections. A few would be: 1-Does the person have a history with the University. I think you should have a relationship/history inside experience with the institution and it's traditions if you want a role in leading it. 2-Is the person there because their political agenda is primarily one that is beyond the University. IOW is their primarly focus on how external political issues are playing in A^2. Those are valid concerns, but should not a regent's primary focus - which needs to be service to the University, not trying to use the University to further or reflect their personal external political agenda. 2-Is the person fundamentally a bomb thrower. A University runs on collegiality. If person is too strident to work with the rest of the board and admin - esp across political reflexes, they will not be of service in the end. 3-at at this point - no more liability lawyers - have enough of that world view with Acker and Bernstein, let's broaden the overall experience/perspective going forward.

Apparently the competition was much but at least Parker handled it well today.

Right - it wasn't that Thompson was such a great player, but he was a lot better than what they got for him. Trading down in value is a quick way to make yourself into a bad team.

I never would have guessed..

Cost is always a consideration, but we don't how expensive he will or won't be at this point.

again, as predictable as the Sun in the East. Did all those fools who wanted a white only America actually think the country could function without all the workers it had imported? Did they think they were all here just for fun? It's so much ignorance. Ignorance about how the world really works vs what their self chosen media prates at them and their Maga leaders promise them. I don't know who wrote those lines for Chernobyl, but "every lie incurs a debt to the truth" needs to be tatooed on the foreheads of about 77 million Americans.

he sort of right at the edge of being a player you want to keep. His career goes either way depending mostly on whether this year is progress, regression, or even stasis.

yeah, you may think war, death, and the world on fire is bad, but what if a trans person wants me to call them 'ze'?

While it doesn't mean anything if you don't hit the ball a lot, he's still got one of the prettiest classic swings you will ever see.

he throws better than I expected to see given the all the early doom and gloom about his D.

That works. If you ever get a chance to see Robards in 'Long Days Journey into Night' with Hepburn, Richardson and Montgomery Clift you'd see him do a brasher persona pretty well. If the movie had actually been made in '62 Tony Curtis would absolutely have been up for Caffee. Would have been a different movie, but it's what Hollywood likely would have made!

Burt could do Jessup, heck Burt could do Caffee. Burt was pretty good.

It's all downhill from here. He will never have an OPS of 5000 again.

And Alabama ain't what it used to be.

yeah - Newman is a good fit for the hotshot, also Kirk Douglas - or Jason Robards, Laughton was probably already too old for Jessup, Ed Begley Sr maybe, Lee.J. Cobb or Robert Ryan, Trevor Howard could do that personality but he couldn't play American. The female lead would be really tough in 62. Fonda probably could have done it, but only an older Jane than in 62. Anne Francis maybe. I can think of some Brit females for it, Sean Philips, Judy Dench.

I know it well. I was commuting that route when it was built. On a bridge like the Mac, since the entry portals are controlled, the State Police easily organize low speed caravans when the winds get dangerous. The 280 bridge is too unimpeded for that to be easy to do and of course it's a rarer situation. Still you need some outside help from the authorities on this kind of thing since as a driver it's hard to know accurately what the wind is doing in any detail as you tool down the Hwy. Interestingly, my Subaru's nav system will wake up and give me severe weather warnings even when it isn't on. I have no idea how common that is in other makes/systems.

Yikes. I've seen that happen out in the plains (e.g. Nebraska) but not in Toledo before!

It's funny how custom can end up changing the rules without anyone ever actually changing the rules. Umpires always had the authority to move the game faster, but it became custom to give players all the time they wanted. So to get back to the intent of the original rules they had to make a new set of rules to reverse custom where the rule was kept by an impassive clock instead of a malleable umpire.

correct. When you spend a lifetime proving you don't care about truth, that you only create your facts to suit your purposes, you've bought yourself the reality that no-one has any reason whatsoever to believe when you think you do have something important to say. For me, nothing Trump says is any more useful to hear than white noise. Well I take that back, his accusations are always good predictors of his own conduct. So beyond recognizing the projections, the rest of what he says generally has negative information value.

NYT quoted a bad number and then fixed their typo apparently because the earlier web edition was not corrected to 5600 ft. The lift in my orginal post was directly from the NYT website but of course they probably heard about it a zillion times and fixed it. I was trying to guess whether BP wanted to operate on the Sisgbee(sp?) trench (over 14k feet) and somebody coverted meters to feet twice, or if they just didn't bother to check the quote they took. In any case, even if you're quoting someone else's number that is off by an order of magnitude and don't note it, you've given it your imprimatur.

LOL - those are not all victories. NBC is better off for the exit of Chuck Todd, and the public has stepped up to save NPR, which now that they are off the Federal dole, and no longer have to worry about losing it, are no longer looking over their shoulders about whether they need to shade their work.

Yeah - engineering schools in particular should not (but too often do) just punt on forcing their students into wider distribution requirements. There are humanities studies that can catch the interest of the technically oriented beyond just getting a grade - such as Rhetoric (not Lit), Philosophy (not Soc), Music, etc.

A really sharp HS class mate of mine (1500 SAT kind of guy) went to Yale for Chemistry - ended up the science editor at Newsweek/WaPo. I don't imagine that happens too much anymore. Just doesn't pay enough.

this is not a political press failing, but just a general example of how the people writing for the press are now so ignorant of the topics they write about that they make mistakes that make you question everything they say. Article in our 'paper of record' the NYT, about BP wanting to put a deep water rig out in the Gulf. The writer gives the depth of water they want to work in as 56,000ft. "Opponents said the extreme pressure and high temperatures required to operate in waters deeper than 56,000 feet heighten the risk of a blowout that could endanger Gulf communities and the marine ecosystem." There is no water on the planet anywhere near that deep (Marianas Trench about 36,000). So what are they even talking about? Deepest water in the Gulf is 13,000-15,000, average is about 5300. But how does a guy end up writing tech for the NYT who doesn't have some idea how deep the ocean are? We are gonna be doomed by our own descent into ignorance.

very interesting.....😉