As I have thought about it, I think that whether implicitly or explicitly, the treatment of service time in arbitration is exactly what Skubal and Boras are making an attempt to change. Skubal, as a leader in the MLBPA, wants to argue about fairness and Skubal's real value. The Tigers - representing ownership, are going to argue for the status quo approach to service time cooked into current arbitration practice and that any break from that is an issue for the next CBA and not something that should be upset by a single arbitration panel decision. Personally, I think a system where players get paid more in line for what they are doing present tense and less about what they did 5 yrs ago is fine in theory, but it's not clear to me how to get there since too many teams probably couldn't afford their young stars on that basis.