gehringer_2

they are all too old to have much unrealized upside.

Maybe not, but do you call him a major leaguer with a 648 OPS and negative WAR? I doubt I'm going to mourn Soto's loss but I'm having trouble seeing how any of these guys do much for us either.

If DD ever had a weakness, it was for questionable RPs!

Oh Lord - I don't think so. I don't like giving up any major leaguer for a bunch of middle aged minor leaguers.

the other thing is that you can't predict with much certainty which way the public mood is going to go if the FC group starts playing obstruction. Maybe it ends up playing well, or maybe the public is tired of it and the backlash ends up being a big boost for the Dems. I think the latter is more likely, in which case the non-FC GOP members are going to see themselves forced pretty quickly into a deal with the Dems to kneecap the FC.

LOL - yeah, the question around Goff is getting close to turning around 180 deg. It's almost as reasonable to ask they they will be able to afford him when his deal is up as whether they want him until his deal is up. I'm all in on CBs. I think the position has always been unrated, and even if it gets more love recently - I'd still say it's under rated. I think part of it is that on the way up so many of the great potential CBs end up on the other side of the ball that there are never enough guys in the league with the physical talent to show how important the position can be if you could get the best athletes there.

and isn't this going to be sort of a dilemma for the Pistons? The excuse made for Cade was always that despite not having a top level shot or top level athleticism, he would redeem himself as a top player by the value of having the ball in his hands, but if you've already brought in another player whose hands you maybe would rather see the ball in, where does does that leave Cade? Can you have two guys share primary ball handling in this NBA? In the end don't you have to be better with one or the other? Of course moot point if Cunningham can't stay healthy.

I suppose there are a couple of different views you can take on this episode. On the one hand, the bad news is that the anarchists were able to win by forcing the speaker to accept all their conditions - though the final word on that may not be written until we see if there turns out to be a fight on the rules, Monday. But on the other hand, the events can can also be read that the GOP caucus as a whole did stand firm and out last the anarchists by refusing to force McCarthy aside though the course of the 15 votes in which he lost only a single supporter from the first vote. Hard to know which of these interpretations is going to be more predictive of rest of the session.

Forecast for game time is 24 deg, no snow. Much less bad than it could be.

Kevin McCarthy begins his speakership

but you can be sure he will be claiming a personal victory within the time it takes to tap out 160 characters from the gavel drop.

I don't think it's a very long limb to climb out on to predict McCarthy will fall in fairly short order, probably when the 1st debt ceiling vote comes up. The FC will refuse to let the speaker bring it to a vote and that will be the end of McCarthy. At that point, when it's something real on the table and not just a personnel matter, we'll see if a durable majority to govern can emerge from a coalition of the center of the two parties or not.

Watch them lose someone else before the end of vote 15.

At the last minute McCarthy moved his people against adjournment. Could be McCarthy finally got the vote he needed from Gaetz

McCarthy hanging on one vote change.

I've given him his due when he has won and on the fact that he generally does right by his players. But he's also a grade 1-A nut job and it never seems to be more than a matter of time between his descents into stupidity, whether it's via twitter, in his play calling, his juvenile insults of other people, the recurring Hamlet act, or now a potentially more consequential bit of stupidity like this. Do you disagree that a primary piece of the job description at Michigan is exactly not to end up where they are now? That's part of the performance review at UM just like wins and losses. You can argue the system is flawed and stupid and I'll give you 100% agreement, but that is the system he's paid to toe the line in.

and it gets more stupid by the day. But they don't pay him millions of bucks to tilt at NCAA windmills, they pay him to win and to not have stuff like this happen.

I don't know why Lalonde uses Sundqvist on the PK, he's slower than molassas. A good PK is usually a matter of speed and disruption.

HITL is a 6 yr old packing? A Derringer maybe?

did he lie or did he obstruct? We all seem to be assuming the former but it's another step to the latter.

the truth is it probably wasn't Fisher or Frieder that was making that program go, neither had any big success after leaving it. I guess it must really have been all Ed Martin.

Yes, they never could have won that game without Steve Fisher...... not.

right - certainly puts a different spin on Bacon's report earlier report. On its initial face you'd have thought "changes" meant NIL, and the portal and player payment issues - in retrospect it now appears it was less about the nature of college football in the future and more about the inconvenience of having to follow the rules.

as usual when a negative story breaks about UM sport - Crickets in the Ann Arbor News...😱 Maybe it will be nothing, but a difficulty here on the Level one charge is that it doesn't require a lot of outside corroboration, the investigators themselves are their own evidentiary source which could make it a lot harder to argue the the facts of the charge with any success.

LOL - So all the while we thought nutcase Harbaugh had gone into remission, maybe he was still there waiting to strike again. Maybe it's going to turn out the buy-out language supposedly being argued about was Harbaugh wanted out of the the University's right to terminate if the program was found guilty of violations....