gehringer_2

I told you, guys with perfect hair are always suspect!

I think you combine the deader ball with moving the mound back a foot or foot and a half and you would take the game back to where it was a couple of generations ago. Moving the mound back negates in the increase in velo that stronger pitchers has produced, so many more balls will go into play. The deader ball negates the increase in HR's that stronger batters and maple bats would otherwise produce given more balls in play. But to your last point, the question remains whether any majority of the game's stakeholders actually want to go back there

I'm out on the Mags as well. Have some individuals I still like and picked up some Euro stock indexes to diversify some more and a lot of short term Treas for the time being.

Piston centers who shoot threes are about the rarest thing in Det sports. On this team Stew averages less than one make a game. You can go back a long way and not find much in the way of long gunning Piston big men. One year of Kelly Olynyk? Rasheed if you want to call him a center, then all the way back to Laimbeer?

so far doing a great job of cutting down on the K's. .....🤢

the funny thing is that the most effective way to have the price of oil fall is to support the purchase of EV's, and the build out of wind and solar, but Trump hasn't figured that out. (Sell a million EVs, take the output of a large refinery out of total demand). But of course if 'energy' prices actually fell, that means oil, and the oil fat cats that donated that $500M to him would not get what he promised them for that $$$ - which just shows you that he knew he was lying from the get go. But with Trump it's ever telling the truth that would be news.

imported beer

Brian Wilson had that figured out years ago.

If like me, you couldn't figure out that map on 1st take, it's the Tx/Mex border at the Gulf Coast.

We've seen McDavid spectating up ice when the Wings scored on his team in 3 on 3. He's not the most dedicated defender.

The harder these guys try to be remembered the faster they are forgotten. When was the last time anyone missed Rush Limbaugh?

At the end of the 2nd when it was still tiedand the Canadians were outshooting the US so badly I said to a buddy that if the US got it to overtime they would win it because Hughes and Larkin are probably the best 3 on 3 players in the game. Shoulda made a prop bet! 😟

He has yet to strike out!

Thompson 8 assists for the 2nd time this season.

I'm stuck in the middle right now because I only bought DirectTV because they had the Tigers and Wings, but the Tigers are now gone (unless they come up with a quck deal) but the Wings season isn't over yet so I don't want to cancel yet -- assuming I do have to go somewhere else for the Tigers. PITA, and wallet.

was out in his 2nd AB but still put the ball in play on a line.

also noted that there is no "TigersTV" on the MLB TV team purchase menu yet, though it appears all the other teams that dropped Diamond are there.

that's where I'm getting it.

LOL - I've agreed with Gorsuch before, but agreeing with Gorsuch is really just a matter of random chance since his judicial philosophy doesn't correspond to any known consistency but his own. If you want to take a serious shot at the Constitutional issue in the US, the root of the problem (which BTW has nothing to do with the current issues with Trump) is that we claim to have a democratic representative government but in practice it cannot be controlled by the majority vote any more. At their core, all the of tensions between Presidential and Congressional power stem from that reality, that an elected US Congress does not adequately represent the will of the American public, with the result that a popularly elected President too often faces a minority controlled legislature, and that gridlock paralyzes government, to the point that all manner of dislocations to the system result because the imperative to govern remains despite the institutional gridlock. The asymmetry of the states, which produce the Senate imbalance, compounded by ossified and distorted rules of procedure, plus the modern addition of data processing power that allows surgical Gerrymanders, have turned the Founder's "great experiment" in democracy into a deflated soufflé. But we are so steeped in our myths of Constitutional inerrancy that we don't even come close to talking about fixing any of it. We have a fundamentally broken system, but are clinging to it like a drunk to his last bottle.

IDK, Congress passes a law to implement policy, creating and funding some kind of agency within the Exec to operate it. That isn't ceded power, that's just the way it has to work unless you want Congress creating it's own parallel bureaucracies. It's not really in the agency structure that Congress has abdicated, it's in allowing the exec free use of the military under non-emergency conditions without grant of any authority and its acquiescence to the proliferation of executive orders for the last couple of decades. Those abdications are real enough. Those are the problem, but that's not what the conservatives are trying to address with Unitary Executive theory.

then what are Isgur and the Federalists complaining about that there is such a pressing need for a more imperial 'Unitary' executive unimpeded by anything beyond his own fiat? It's their complaint.

It isn't even so much that Congress has ceded its power, it's that Congress had been an active enabler. A Congress properly outraged at having been told bald-faced lies at confirmation hearings or at any of the Trump cabinet outrages of the day could have removed any one of these turkey's - including Trump himself of course. The tariff case never reaches the SCOTUS if the House doesn't suspend the 'emergency clock'. Trump hasn't had power ceded to him, he's been actively aided and abetted.

Conservatives used to accuse Liberals of being 'Ivy Tower'. but it seems it's now Conservative that pine for idealistic constructs that have no relation or possibility of implementation in the real world. Independent administrative agencies insulated from executive branch politics are a perfectly practical solution to technological regulation. The Federal Society's complaint that they don't conform to their idealizations of government structure is windmill tilting of the highest order. And she's dead wrong about campaign finance reform.

I don't disagree, I'm just pointing out that if you accept this logical construct of Trump's on tariffs (basically that the power of creation/destruction implies the power of complete regulation) I don't see how you can avoid the logical connection to how that would apply to CU. Granted that the law defies logic often enough.

what's interesting here is that logically, he is making the exact argument that would also defeat Citizen's United. Congress has the power to change corporate law and basically eliminate current corporate structure as a legal entity in the US and every US corporation as currently constituted with it, but the court ruled Congress does not have the power to regulate a subset of that entity's existence - i.e. political contributions. Exact same argument. Verrrrry interesteenk!