gehringer_2

get Perez and Riley going again and it would be a lot better line-up in the next round.

This. But we'll take it.

Managers always look like geniuses when guys perform, always look like dunces when they don't.

Yikes. Flaherty gets the K after almost giving up the long ball. Game of milliseconds.

Torkelson took two tough breaking balls for strikes looking for a better pitch and never got one. The Tigers approach problem in a nutshell. They refuse to put strikes in play and end up in a hole where they can't cover everything.

do not understand why Perez was put on the roster. He is totally lost at the plate recently.

I think he will be a guy who it benefits more than most.

An old boss of mine had sign over his desk with something pretty close: "Why is there never time to do it right the first time but always time to do it over?"

Fixing that is Scott Harris' job. That's why you hire the smartest guy in the room, right? He knew coming in he was in a market that was not going to give out that kind of contract, he better have planned for it.

The "Christian Church" as a whole in the US is lost. The remnants that reject its current state are even seeking to abandon the term "Christian" as their identifier altogether as hopelessly polluted and are looking for a reformulation of what to call themselves.

To me it comes down to "can you find a way to battle against a good pitcher?" To me that means being able to battle against well located pitches and not just waiting for mistakes - though obviously hitting the mistakes is hugely important - if they have done even that today they win easily. Every guy in majors can do it occasionally - for instance, we've seen McKinstry have some fantastic AB's this season. The trick is can you be at least somewhat consistent in bringing that level of compete.

I don't know if there is any easy metric for it, but just my casual sense watching Carpenter is that he has huge games with mulitple HRs/RBI, then disappears for a week. Looks pretty good on average but not very dependable day to day. Obviously with a >70% failure rate for hitters across the board, there always a lot of that with every hitter, but it's just my impression that it's moreso with Kerry. Or maybe his hitting is just more match-up dependent than some guys?

It's not how many HRs he hits, it's his net production by any better standard - RunsCreated, OPS, oWAR, RE24 etc. In a year when he should have still been improving, he is overall down by all those measures despite the increase in his HR total.

Fair point

Elmer has the luxury of not having to skate a lot to still take up a lot of space.

I always wonder where Hinch is in all this in terms of what he is encouraging guys to do in a given AB - whether explicitly or implicitly. Torkelson is a good opposite field hitter and can reach the seat oppo in almost any ballpark, but he doesn't go that way as much as I would like to see him. So the question is do the Tigers get a lot of all-or-nothing hitting because that is what they encourage? IDK but it's a fair question.

My only question would be whether someone was paying attention to what he doing in the off-season last year that no-one thought to push back on the extreme swing path. It was pretty predictable that was going to lead to holes that pitchers would exploit.

They've gotten back into the habit of giving away too many 1st pitch strikes. You have to be ready to hit the 1st strike or you are in a hole. You can still work counts without always taking the 1st one.

I'll disagree on Torkelson. He's above average production, plays his position well and stays in the line-up. He's not going to be an all-star but he's a solid ballplayer. You need that profile. Keith I think is going to be fine, I think his bat to ball skill will play as his power develops and he'll be more of an asset at 3rd than his meh range made him at 2nd. I think he and Tork both have pretty good zone judgement and so will be helped more than average by the robo-ump. I think Torres is a solid ball-player but it's immaterial in his case because he is gone. Meadows is a disappointment. I think he needs a whole stance revamp because he cannot cover his long body's K zone. Maybe get into more of a crouch (I know, the TIger theories like like stand-up hitters 🤷‍♂️) OTOH - I'm not a big fan of Perez - too many mental lapses regardless of whether his bat come around or not - which isn't looking all that likely - they love him for now since he's a switch hitter and they don't have any others. Pretty much agree on the rest - I do assume Riley will get his head out of his *** as a hitter this off-season. The talent is there. It would be big blow if he can't get back to <25% Ks. Overall pretty thin. If Anderson and McGonigle (Clark even?) could be solid bats at some point next season - they could get back to more normal offensive output but it's not there right now.

Then again, the team with the record for most wins in a season in the modern era washed out after one round in the playoffs and has never been to the WS.

It has been disappointed that Tork and Dingler are the only young players who have exceeded last season's productivity. The rest all plateaued or regressed (Sweeney, Perez, Greene, Meadows, JHM, Keith, Carpenter). McKinstry and Baez had good season's by their own standards, but they're vets not Tiger system guys.

You know what Casey Mize is thinking: "If you'd given me two more innings you'd have never had gotten to Melton..." He's probably wrong but you know that's what he is thinking.

OK - flush this.

Why is it that the fact they are within a bloop and an blast is still zero hopeful?

well thtey are making Smith do a lot of throwing. That and a fin will get you a Latte.