chasfh

If only we could win with facts.

Maybe we need a way to figure out how to co-opt that flag from the right. How about anti-ICE and No Kings protesters showing up en masse with Gadsden flags? After all, if anyone is being trod on, it's them. The right wing co-opts things from liberals all the time. They took a great word for a great concept, "woke", and turned it into a dirty word. That's only one example. No reason why we couldn't do that with that stupid ****ing flag.

This seems like a really good exercise to critique and hone students’ approaches to critical thinking and rhetoric.

Yeah, this is one of THE most egregious

And the flag, since this is how they want to make America great again.

The players are telling us that at this time, they want money now over years later. No one knows whether they’ll be earning any income next year at all, and beyond that, what anything will look like under the new CBA.

Maybe. I think it’s not a bad bet that one of those six will be better than Bassitt, though. Melton may be the best bet, Olson if he can stay heathy, Anderson as a wild card, SGL as a dark horse.

Except they’ll make more.

How do they relate?

Sure, why not? Who wouldn’t want to win multiple rings with a superteam?

Nobody has enough.

AI's is not to reason why, AI's is to do and comply.

This is super cool. I just wish it was clearer. A Brilliantly Detailed Map Of Medieval Trade Routes & Networks

Maybe if we show Trump this, he'll stop caring about Greenland and Canada. 😁

The Name “John” in Different European Languages I did not know "Evan" is Welsh for John.

When in Rome ... kiss twice.

I love these maps.

I'm just basing my assessment on what I see now versus what I saw before, and if not racking my brain for reasons to doubt it or explain it away makes me a slappy, I guess I'll wear it. In my opinion, Occam's Razor applies here. Let everybody else's mileage differ for all I care.

.

How did you phrase the pushback, exactly? How is it working for you?

The hard part for anyone with massive reach is exactly that: X has a great deal of reach, and no one who relies on maximum engagement from their customer base wants to intentionally reduce that. The other part, of course, is whether those organizations are truly anti-nazi, or are in willful denial as to its very existence. That's probably more the question at hand.

I see, OK. The post mentioned only Bassitt and Ponce by name, you said “him”, and I deduced you did not mean Ponce.

It’s only January still.

Suspending elections was on the dock long before this. But yes, a pretext would be convenient. I’m not sure it’s something he himself could do on his own, although he’s doing a lot of things on his own that the Constitution doesn’t allow presidents to do, and everyone is letting him get away with it, so, who knows what’s next.

No, because according to the article: Trump spokesperson Steven Cheung said in a statement to USA TODAY. "A lunatic was wildly screaming expletives in a complete fit of rage, and the President gave an appropriate and unambiguous response," So, appropriate for the so-called leader of the free world.