chasfh

I think this is sometimes true and not always true.

You are correct. It is also correct that you habituate a forum loaded with participants who grew up during the greatest period of year-to-year roster retention in big league history, and it can be hard to think beyond the principles of the game you committed to memory when you were eleven.

Ted knew more about hitting than just about all of his contemporaries, so with this I agree.

Awesome! Barring some last minute deal with Draft Kings YouTube channel or something, we should be free and clear of annoyingly constant gambling odds for at least one year.

Where did I defend Harris for signing (I assume you mean) Paddack and Morton? Do you have receipts on that?

I’m sorry, are you actually denying that there are people here who want to trade Skubal?? Please tell me I don’t have to provide proof of that!

Scott Harris isn't a perfect GM, I don't think and haven't said so, and I don't know anyone else who has said so. I'm not sure I can agree at face value that his "bad moves outnumber his good moves, by far."

So ironic that you conclude your post with "the future is now" when so many fans want to trade away our generationally-talented two-time-defending Cy Young pitcher so we can possibly compete three or four years from now at the explicit expense of now.

Good for you. And your family.

I remember watching video of a network news report that aired a day or two after the Kent State shootings—it might have been part of some documentary I saw—where they interviewed Joe and Jane Public on the street about what they thought of what happened there, and a frightening number of them said that the kids deserved to be shot, and one of them said they should have shot more kids, that'll teach them to use college to dodge their sacred military duty, or something along those lines. That's where these present-day degenerate boomer and gen x jagoffs learned to cheer for that kind of thing: from their degenerate "greatest generation" parents.

Exactly. Remember when they claimed the first Trump inauguration had a largest ever crowd when photo evidence showed that was not true? And when called on it they just stuck to their sotry, even though everyone could see they were lying? That served notice that this cabal would constantly employ the "don't believe your lying eyes" strategy. Now that has extended to them murdering people in front of our eyes and telling us that's not what happened. That's where we are at now. Can you imagine where we will be at by the end of this year?

But then they would have to pull the lady out of the car and she would be struggling and pushing back and that would be hard. Better to just shoot her dead on the spot. So much easier. 😞

Disagree. There will be someone else speaking at that convention who will have shot dead way more citizens than this guy will have.

This is exactly what they voted for. This video will be a huge recruitment tool.

They're removing the guardrails and getting us used to seeing this for when the military comes to your town and mine.

What are you talking about? She was nominated at the convention in Milwaukee. It was in all the papers.

I'm assuming they are gutting the apparatus that prevent and prosecute fraud because they want their designated enemies to be punished for fraud based only on accusation and not at all on evidence. More bluntly, they want only their own say-so to stand as the actionable evidence of fraud, and by having an actual apparatus in place designed to ferret out actual fraud, they would have to use it to prove fraud, which would frequently backfire on them, and they can't allow that to happen. Thus, they are pushing for a system where their mere accusation is both de facto and de jure evidence.

Supercalifragilistic

Fascinating!

Careful where you go in London. London’s Violent Crime Rate Compared To The UK National Average

Map of The Holy Roman Empire At Its Territorial Peak In The 12th Century

I ... I had no idea ... 😲 Where You Can & Can’t Flush Toilet Paper Around The World

This is good: I like this, it's worth adding. I'm a little surprised at the Virgin Islands: Rank State 2023 Share of Tourists Tourist Numbers (000) 1 New York 28.84% 9,076 2 Florida 25.21% 7,933 3 California 19.92% 6,269 4 Nevada 6.83% 2,149 5 Texas 5.95% 1,872 6 Hawaiian Islands 5.30% 1,668 7 Illinois 4.73% 1,488 8 Massachusetts 3.99% 1,256 9 New Jersey 3.25% 1,023 10 Arizona 2.99% 941 11 Georgia 2.89% 909 12 Pennsylvania 2.68% 843 13 Guam 2.24% 705 14 Washington 2.07% 651 15 Utah 1.82% 573 16 Virginia 1.58% 497 17 Colorado 1.48% 466 18 North Carolina 1.45% 456 19 Tennessee 1.36% 428 20 Michigan 1.22% 384 21 Ohio 1.06% 334 22 Maryland 1.03% 324 23 Louisiana 1.01% 318 24 Connecticut 0.93% 293 25 South Carolina 0.70% 220 26 Indiana 0.67% 211 26 Minnesota 0.66% 208 28 Wisconsin 0.65% 205 28 Oregon 0.64% 201 30 Puerto Rico 0.50% 157 31 Missouri 0.49% 154 32 Wyoming 0.41% 129 33 Maine 0.36% 113 34 Kentucky 0.33% 104 35 Alaska 0.32% 101 36 Alabama 0.31% 98 37 Kansas 0.29% 91 37 Rhode Island 0.29% 91 37 New Mexico 0.27% 85 40 New Hampshire 0.26% 82 40 Oklahoma 0.22% 69 40 Arkansas 0.21% 66 40 Iowa 0.21% 66 44 Montana 0.21% 66 45 Delaware 0.17% 53 46 Idaho 0.17% 53 47 Nebraska 0.17% 53 47 South Dakota 0.16% 50 47 Mississippi 0.13% 41 50 Vermont 0.13% 41 51 North Dakota 0.08% 25 52 West Virginia 0.07% 22 53 U.S. Virgin Islands 0.06% 19

No one is talking about Epstein at the moment.