chasfh

They sure were yesterday, at least.

Accident of geography?

A bat-first outfielder. A tale as old as 1876.

What the everliving ****, Wenceel.

Well, yeah, it's not as though they're interested in freedom and liberty for literally everyone, right? That has never been how conservatism works. That's always been a liberal idea.

Brandon Carr has already tried to block that route.

I do agree that in a free and fair election, contested democratically, the Democrats smoke the republicans off the field.

They're not blameless victims, but I guess they're moldable clay?

Oh god, please let this be true. 1 big thing: Gen Z leads social media exodus Some Gen Zers — ages 14 to 29 — are ditching social media in pursuit of better mental health, Axios' Rebecca Falconer reports. It's part of a wider digital detox movement away from screens and toward analog options. Research suggests that social media use is waning — and that more people are embracing app-blocking products and "dumbphones" that lack social media apps. 📵 Chris Wells, a self-described former "Twitter and Instagram junkie," tells Axios that he's "99% off" social media after doing a "Month Offline" challenge. The 26-year-old says: "I didn't know who I was without my social media accounts, and when I quit, it was pretty miraculous." "The one thing that really came back to me was a sense of privacy. I hadn't really felt that since I was a kid." 🗑️ 17-year-old Aditi Ediga deleted her phone's social media apps last fall. Ediga says: "One reason why teenagers don't want to delete apps and stop using them is that they're scared they're going to miss out on stuff, and then I realized I wasn't really missing out on anything." 🤝 NYU social psychologist Jonathan Haidt, author of a bestselling book on the effects of childhood tech use, tells Axios: "What you're seeing now, especially among Gen Z, is a self-correction back toward real-world connection." "They've felt the costs of isolation and are rediscovering what actually leads to flourishing." 🤳 Yes, but: Plenty of young Americans are still spending countless hours on social media, with platforms facing calls to ban or restrict teen access. Go deeper.

Trump definitely would have won, because he definitely would have run again and Hillary would have taken the blame for the virus.

Is it not considered a major in Europe?

I agree that getting older has a lot to do with it. The closer you get to the 18th hole, the less stupid **** matters.

If Hillary had won, Trump would have won in 2020.

The question is whether they can get Democrat voters to just throw their hands up and quit, thus ceding permanent ruling power to the Trump regime, versus being energized and fighting against it. Honestly, I have no inclination on which one I would put my money on.

Of course it's a joke to them because they are making it all happen on purpose.

He is thisclose to dropping an n-bomb in public, after which there will be a pearl-clutching debate about it on mainstream news networks, jokes will be made about it on late night shows, and while everyone's paying all their attention to that, more cabinet departments will be further decimated and underreported on. Rinse and repeat.

Sounds like a merry mix-up due to accents.

Fun fact: Mary Talley Bowden is an otolaryngologist (ENT) and sleep‑medicine specialist, which does not de facto make her an authority on antiviral pharmacology or hantavirus. Her public statements about ivermectin and RNA viruses are not supported by infectious‑disease guidelines or virology research, despite that she is an actual physician. Her statements here are similar to a dermatologist giving cardiology advice or a podiatrist giving oncology advice. https://npiprofile.com/npi/1699858282

They want to be able to bomb people indiscriminately and just have it be normal everyday business, NBD. Calling it a "war" makes it a big hairy deal and, more importantly, constitutionally involves Congress, which the White House wants nothing to do with.

The Cubs have already had a ten-game winning streak and they're in the middle of a nine-game streak now. They are 7-12 outside those streaks.

Doesn't mean it's wrong. I also don't see the business advantage of outrageously lying about it. What's in it for Boras to do so? Skubal gets back when he gets back whether it's four weeks, eight weeks, twelve weeks, or 2027.