chasfh

I'm guessing there's a generational thing at play here.

I don’t know who Christopher Kline is, but seeing from his bio that he specializes in the NBA Draft, pinch on salt applies here. That said, I don’t see how any of these deals do not make us worse next year.

What a powerful message it would send if they could get 12 million showing up for one of these during January.

Anderson has been picking up some reps at third and he’s been pretty good at it.

Honestly, I’m surprised there’s any money at all in making a Monopoly version for the 128th largest city in the country.

Yabba dabba don’t.

I think it’s a done deal Flaherty opts out of his $20MM next year because at worst, he gets a QO of probably around $22MM. The question would then be whether he takes that. I say he doesn’t, because everyone can see the numbers under the hood are better than his topline numbers. He can do better in the marketplace. I’m gonna say 3/70 for him. I’m not saying he’s necessarily worth that, but pitching is getting expensive, plus he’s a horse and gives you innings.

And this is not a dig at our new friend here—by the way, welcome aboard, @This is the year—but nearly everyone who puts together a projected roster for the following season invariably makes it up as being 90% to 100% whoever’s in the system today. It’s nearly impossible to imagine all the new players the front office might pick up over the winter. The 2025 opening day roster contained five new players.

By the way, you’re doing it wrong. Doxxing that teacher here’s not gonna do anything.

They want us dead.

I’m guessing that we will have a lot more players coming in from outside the system than just the one each year.

I’m out of reactions today, but, Thanks.

I don’t think Tucker gets ten years given his down-ish year and missing a month with injury. Seven sounds about right.

I’m out of reactions for the day, but, Like.

Yeah? Are they posting about getting loced up and going into action?

Figures the person who doesn’t appear to understand the concept of social responsibility would put a confused face on it. I guess social responsibility = socialism = Marxism.

Not a chance they rooted against Charlie’s Angels. Those were pretty white women, not brown people.

Painting No Kings as anti-American was never meant to stop it from happening. It as meant to stoke rage and a sense of vengeance in all the gun-toting red hats who are anxiously awaiting their deputization.

Let’s also be clear on this: They will force confrontations at a future one, if not the next one, to stop it as it happens. Also: look for false flags plants there to try to create chaos and disorder.

Haven’t they already?

Why did the border agent hide? Why didn’t he just shoot everyone in the house dead? He’s clearly not very good at his job. He’s going to get replaced for sure.

Remember: not a genocide. Oops—wrong thread … 😉

This might actually end up being a canny response on his part, as it might wear down any remaining objections there might be among the red hats to the idea of Trump being king. Because if the people they have burning hate for protest the idea of Trump being king, then wouldn’t their only “rational” response be to completely and utterly support the idea that Trump is a king, and should be a king, and not a mere president? I mean, haven’t we already seen that here?

Stupid may be part of it, but ignorance is the large majority of it, and the stupid part of that is that the ignorance is happily self-imposed.