chasfh

Maybe pitchers should start taking BP to prepare.

Reading this passage from the Sporting News archives put a smile on my face. This is an interview with Bill Clarke, former big-league pitcher being asked about modern-day pitchers: "How do they call themselves pitchers?" he fumed. "They walk for four or five men in a row, pitch two or three innings, get a run behind and when a base hit is made off them, they look around for help. Pitchers in our day started and finished. I think some of them ought to be left in there when the going gets rough. It's the only way to make them get control and toughen them up." This conversation took place in the December 7, 1949 issue of the Sporting News. And if there's one thing we all know about the pitchers of 1949, they were namby-pambies who couldn't last more than three innings. 💀

It struck me yesterday that Succession became such a cultural force on its own terms, I had basically forgotten that it was promoted as a Will Ferrell/Adam McKay joint when it first came out. Those two guys were presumably the main reason to give it a try.

I can see why people wouldn't like that. I have also heard him make a call such as safe or out and then have to reverse it.

Gopher strikes Boyd again. Sigh.

First of all, Dan Dickerson continues to be arguably the best and most honest play-by-play broadcaster in baseball. On reviews, he always take a position on whether the play should be upheld or overturned, which I really appreciate, because I do, too. So many other broadcasters would look at the same play, even when it's totally obvious, and still be like, "ooooh, that's so close, can't really tell", as if they can't bring themselves to come down on the side of the play itself when it looks as though their employer might come out on the short end of the review. Secondly, Andy Dirks is becoming a favorite analyst of mine, not only because he's good at analysis and also good at talking about it, but also because he's got a terrific rapport with Dan. They just went through a comic thing where Dan said he thought Ibanez was out as the play was going on, the replay showed Dan was right, and Andy started joking how Dan is always 100% right on these, and they maybe don't even need a crew in New York to confirm the call, they should just call Dan. It doesn't read very fun when I type it out, but it sounded very fun while they doing going through it on air. I think I would be quite happy if Andy Dirks were to become the new permanent radio analyst for the Detroit Tigers.

Bases loaded no outs—too many innings of late when they do not score when they get here. Let's break that cycle here.

I can imagine a certain ex-president giddy at the prospect of more immigration from Germany and Sweden.

Wow! Not US!

Not a map, per se, but pretty cool graphic.

Pretty much what you would expect.

Fun fact: nine of the ten teams in the AL East and AL West combined are above .500—above .518, to be precise—and not one of the other six teams have records that good.

The only two candidates I can see are Rodriguez and Lorenzen, and they are both rentals with inconsistent history, so we would have to rely on Scott Harris magic to extract sustainable value in trade for either of them.

I believe Harris was never going to spend this season, and that he won't spend next season, either. The first order of business is restructuring the entire organization to build a sustainable winner. The feast-famine cycle of throw big money at free agents to win suddenly-tank for draft picks and/or cost savings appears to be over. Thankfully.

I could see us moving a suddenly-hot, rather-aged McKinstry for a decent prospect.

I can't see us making any moves along the lines of trading future for someone to help us win now. First of all, I don't see who we have among our prospects that can unlock a difference maker for us today. Secondly, I don't believe just one player would be able to put us over the top. We would need at least two, maybe three. I think we will ride or die with who we have in the system right now, barring a surprisingly fruitful waiver pickup. If we still sneak into the postseason with who we have now, what a coup that would be!

Seems kind of presumptuous of them to put something on your lawn without your explicit permission, but maybe that's just the way things are there. Was just wondering is all.

I don't think either of those two will make it to Detroit this season, and Schoop will be still on the team on October 1.

Oh, I think that’s pretty right. It wouldn’t shock me to see us get swept by the Rangers. We’re probably going to have a 10-20 run at some point. We’re nota good team yet. We’re punching above our weight right now. That’s why I still say 75 wins. But, damn it, I’m having a great time watching this team. 😎

Well, if we don’t trade him, I bet we don’t release him. Ride or die.

Pythagoras was obtuse.

That’s what allowed the walk off to happen. I don’t care if these guys are going to win only 75 games. I am super charged up, if not for this team exactly, then for what direction this organization is going. We have a team of players with slight talent and we’re winning games with them, sometimes against good teams, sometimes against the White Sox, with a fresh approach that optimizes guys’ talent. Some of the approaches we all agree on (e.g., taking more walks is better than taking fewer walks), some of which are controversial here (e.g., free-wheeling substitutions, players playing multiple positions). Love them all or love only some, it’s hard to deny that it’s working and winning us games. We are currently in second place, one game back. Even more impressively, we are now 23-17 in our last forty. That’s a 93-win pace!

Agree, there are a lot of different circumstances that could affect return

Nobody wanted who? Not sure I'm following.