If there is a significant correlation of betting activity exceeding usual activity in relation to his first pitch “waste pitch” percentage, what is the baseline that determines this as an actionable offense?
How is it decided that a certain percent exceeds random variation and is intentional?
And does a machine make this determination or a person? Having a mute non-conscious calculating device making a decision of this gravity troubles me.
And if there is a significant correlation, is actionable culpability directed at betting operations which incite activity of this sort? Can they be charged with anything?
I’m also wondering how independent of gambling interests this oversight entity is. I have no idea how this actually works.
Is the wolf guarding the hen house? Is Dracula overseeing the blood bank?