Jump to content

Gun Legislation, Crime, and Events


Tigerbomb13

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, chasfh said:

That’s because Democratic centrists have long had the broad general support of the establishment and to some degree the people at large, and extreme leftists have practically never had that.

This is a conservative country with a warped sense of its own frontier history and present, and as such will tolerate as normative the extreme on only one side of the spectrum, because that side is friendlier to lone wolves, and people like to see themselves as rugged individualists responsible for and to only themselves. That’s what right-wing extremism promotes, which is the opposite of the collectivism left-wing extremism promotes.

The more any policy requires or promotes any kind of social cooperation among people in order to work, the more likely it will fail in America.

too true. And totally ironic as the capabilities that lifted the US to global predominance are all deeply cooperative - public education, science, and war fighting. The lone wolves in Wyoming would all be speaking German or Russian today if theirs had ever been the real ethos driving the future in the US. 

Edited by gehringer_2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, gehringer_2 said:

too true. And totally ironic as the capabilities that lifted the US to global predominance are all deeply cooperative - public education, science, and war fighting. The lone wolves in Wyoming would all be speaking German or Russian today if theirs had ever been the real ethos driving the future in the US. 

Indeed!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don’t normally think about it that way when it comes to police forces, but it is true that they are populated by people, and a certain percentage of people are cowardly bastards who are in it only to boss ordinary people around, intimidate cafe owners into giving them free meals, run any red light or stop sign they feel like, roll hookers and drug dealers for sex and money, and bang badge chasers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, oblong said:

I don't know this town but could it be considered kind of "light" in terms of police duty?   How often would they come into dangerous situations?

Probably not often. In Michigan terms, imagine this all transpiring in Lapeer or Adrian or some place like that. 

I know that the job is dangerous and I don't want to be too harsh on police, but the job is pretty attractive as well: it pays well, the benefits are fantastic. Even in states like Texas which are hostile to union membership, their ability to unionize is practically sacrosanct. Outside of maybe the fire department, they are the God's of civil service. They are valued far more than the guy who works for the Public Works department who keeps the water tap running or the the Parks Department employee who keeps the parks clean.

But that level of value that they provide comes with the expectation that when the rubber meets the road, that they will put their lives on the line to take care of problems as they arise. And this was just a global failure all around, and hearing all the fallout from the event and how public officials are responding here locally, it is (correctly) delivering a blow to all the "thin blue line" virtue signaling that abounds here... the contours of the debate over policing after the George Floyd protests still exist to an extent, but I do think that the "police are never wrong" subtext that the "thin blue line" flags and decals convey is being challenged.

Edited by mtutiger
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Motown Bombers said:

Thread

 

But this is what I was afraid of. The discussion about the quality of the police response it a total misdirection from the real problem, which was the shooter being there armed the was he was in the first place. The police may have made it much worse, but fundamentally the situation was lost before they ever got there - that is what needs to be fixed.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

so an unarmed mother with no body armor stormed in to get her kid but cops with armor and shields and guns were like "No, man....." 

Why are there even cops in that town?  If you don't go in when kids are in the process of being killed then you don't need them.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/texas/article/Uvalde-police-officer-was-detained-as-he-tried-to-17256559.php

A good guy with a gun, prevented from doing anything by other 'good' guys with more guns.  The loss of life is horrible, but the response is infuriating.  It does look like Texas and this city is going to try and hide the details, but everything needs to come out.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...