Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, romad1 said:

Ditto.  My plan as such is to do as much good as possible where it can be done and not violate the oaths we've taken because we are responsible for our own honor and can't help it if the system is rewarding the worst violators of those oaths.  I was planning to return to Michigan when the wife retires from federal service in a couple years.  So, we shall see.

 

Quote

“Do all the good you can, by all the means you can, in all the ways you can, in all the places you can, at all the times you can, to all the people you can, so long as ever you can”

Always good advice, even if it came from a lapsed Anglican. :classic_wink:

  • Haha 1
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, CMRivdogs said:

 

I'd prefer Kavanaugh, Barrett  and Roberts not be JOTSCOTUS, but that said, they are not in the same class of crazy as Thomas and Alito and are occasionally going to contribute to a reasonable result. Gorsuch is also his own kind of crazy, but over different things than Alito and Thomas. (EDITED)

Edited by gehringer_2
  • Like 2
Posted
On 1/24/2025 at 6:23 PM, chasfh said:

Looks like we're gonna get our taxes to fund religious schools sooner than later. And when I say "religious", I mean only one religion.

 

Which religion is that?  Is it all Christians or do they leave out the Catholics?  

Posted
7 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

Good point. With the mode that Trump is in now, it could get even worse.

Those guys have 10 years left or so. The replacement would have 40.

  • Like 2
Posted
14 minutes ago, Edman85 said:

Those guys have 10 years left or so. The replacement would have 40.

OK, that makes sense.  I wasn't sure what you were getting at in the original post.  

Posted

I didn't see this discussed anywhere, which may be a symptom of the constant fire hose, but didn't the Supreme Court just side with Donald Trump over Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution? 

 

Posted

My understanding per a Steven Vladek skeet last night was that it's a fair/reasonable delay in the decision.

I would think he wouldn't be chill if it was really bad.

Posted
55 minutes ago, pfife said:

My understanding per a Steven Vladek skeet last night was that it's a fair/reasonable delay in the decision.

I would think he wouldn't be chill if it was really bad.

It's a little bit of "even though it was you that broke it, but we know you can't fix it as fast as you broke it"

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...