Jump to content

Investing


Motown Bombers

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Deleterious said:

Intel Gains on Report That Qualcomm Made Takeover Approach

Sort of interesting.  I can't see the Feds allowing this to happen.  And I don't understand why Qualcomm would want this to happen.  Manufacturing chips is extremely difficult and Intel isn't very good at it.  In fact, they currently out source some of their production to TSMC because Intel can't do it.

Intel does have some interesting chip technology coming down the pipeline.  Early benchmarks for their Lunar Lake chips look good, comparable to Snapdragon and even some of the Apple ARM stuff.  But again, those chips were designed by Intel but manufactured by TSMC.  Maybe Qualcomm wants to pick the good parts off the carcass and leave all the manufacturing garbage behind.

 

yeah - I don't know where Qualcomm was going either. I think for Intel it was just good PR to talk about someone being interested. Intel's big foundry investments will be coming on line over in the next couple/three years. If they execute on those, the foundry business will be fine, if not, not so much of course. They are still "all in" with the plan so to speak other than one plant 'delayed' (read canceled?) in Germany, and this is the lull before the win or loss gets tallied. At this point Wall street doesn't like the bet - of course it doesn't like many bets that far over the horizon! But Intel's balance sheet is strong enough they won't be in serious danger before they get to see if their investments pay off or not. They have also triangulated themselves into status politically as the strategic national defense supplier in US Gov reshoring efforts away from TSMC so its a good chance they are now on Uncle Sam's "won't be allowed to fail" list if any lifelines are ever required. Company still may make more sense in 2 pieces, but I get the impression they are just making noises of due diligence in that direction for the street without being serious about wanting to do it - but I'm just spit balling there - we'll see how it shakes out in maybe a year or so.

Edited by gehringer_2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10:40 ET -- Nike is one of the most mentioned companies in the U.S. across all news items in the past 12 hours, according to Factiva data. Nike withdrew its full-year guidance and postponed its first investor day in seven years while it evaluates the direction of the company following the appointment of Elliott Hill as chief executive. For the second quarter, Nike said it expects revenue to be down 8% to 10% as it deals with higher promotions and lower benefits from its pricing actions. Analysts polled by FactSet expect second-quarter revenue to be down 6.7%. Nike's change of plans comes as it reports a 10% drop in revenue in its first quarter after delivering lower-than-expected unit sales. Dow Jones & Co. owns Factiva. (chris.wack@wsj.com)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 1776 said:

10:40 ET -- Nike.....

Michael Jordan and LeBron are old men. More kids are aspiring to be TicToc influencers than being like Mike.

The problem with building your brand on culture is that culture changes. 

Not to mention that there seem to be a lot more complaints about their product quality. For years I bought nothing but Nike because they were one of the only shoes that had sufficient arch for me. But some number of years ago there was a shift, and Nike, among others, started just building flat arch shoes and whatever arch you got came from the removable insole. At that point they had no special appeal and it's been a long time since a bought a pair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BLS employment report this morning: +254,000. Expectation was +150,000. Unemployment ticks down to 4.1%

Probably not a good idea to hold your breath waiting for another 50pt rate cut from the Fed in Nov.

 

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/september-jobs-report-crushes-expectations-as-us-economy-adds-254000-jobs-unemployment-rate-falls-to-41-123503927.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said:

BLS employment report this morning: +254,000. Expectation was +150,000. Unemployment ticks down to 4.1%

Probably not a good idea to hold your breath waiting for another 50pt rate cut from the Fed in Nov.

Absolutely. The 10 yr. spiked on the news. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Hongbit said:

I can’t wait to see the post-election revisions of these numbers on the December release.

I’m guessing they will get revised down by at least 120,000.  

Big facts. Same reason Jimmy Hoffa called off the dogs at the ports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Deleterious said:

The tentative agreement for 61% raises over six years probably played a small role. That is a solid number.

I'd be damn happy with a 61% raise over 6 years!  It beats the 15% I'll likely get.  

I like my job though, so I'm not complaining.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't followed it very close, but I think this is just an agreement to work, but things are still pending. Could be wrong.

What I did find interesting, in these talks, at one time, part of the bargaining was over automation. Ports would be easy to automate given our technology. That reduces cost, therefore prices, and of course profit. At the cost of labor - or the very same people who buy what they just shipped in.

Whatever can be automated will be. How does that turn out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Screwball said:

I haven't followed it very close, but I think this is just an agreement to work, but things are still pending. Could be wrong.

What I did find interesting, in these talks, at one time, part of the bargaining was over automation. Ports would be easy to automate given our technology. That reduces cost, therefore prices, and of course profit. At the cost of labor - or the very same people who buy what they just shipped in.

Whatever can be automated will be. How does that turn out?

the union can negotiate a bit of holding action for their current members, but you can't stop it anymore than you can expect to see farmers turning in their combines and hiring serfs to harvest their wheat with a scythe.

Edited by gehringer_2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Screwball said:

I haven't followed it very close, but I think this is just an agreement to work, but things are still pending. Could be wrong.

What I did find interesting, in these talks, at one time, part of the bargaining was over automation. Ports would be easy to automate given our technology. That reduces cost, therefore prices, and of course profit. At the cost of labor - or the very same people who buy what they just shipped in.

Whatever can be automated will be. How does that turn out?

To clarify - to increase profit, not reduce.

Edited by Screwball
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hoffa guy’s speech about shutting down the country made for a great sound bite but he’s just the East Coast.  All of the West Coast ports are a different union and operating like normal.     Our supply chain may have slowed a bit but it was never grinding to halt.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hongbit said:

Hoffa guy’s speech about shutting down the country made for a great sound bite but he’s just the East Coast.  All of the West Coast ports are a different union and operating like normal.     Our supply chain may have slowed a bit but it was never grinding to halt.     

Yup. The things people would have noticed the most are consumer goods and electronics and they come in from Asia via the West Coast. I know it would be tough for the kids at Princeton and Yale to miss the deliveries of their new Bimmer's though....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, 1776 said:

10 yr yield closed above 4%. 

I'm old so I want to protect my money. The market is too risky for me at this point (other than a small fund I play with to get my nuts off). I welcome these higher interest rates. You can do OK just playing short term yields, and completely risk free at the same time. If you get frisky, some corporate bonds can do even better.

Funny how the Fed tries to control interest rates, but they (rates) seem to do what they want to anyway. It's almost like there is something other than central planning, or the attempt of...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...