Jump to content

Investing


Motown Bombers

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, 1776 said:

Don’t know that this is really related to investing but the annual COLA number for 2025 is 2.5%. Don’t spend it all in one place. 

I'll take anything I can get. The good news for us this past year is whatever change there was on Medicare drug prices helped quite a bit. From paying nearly $700 a month for Ofev after copay to nothing the last several months.

Now just hoping the price of TP drops

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, 1776 said:

Don’t know that this is really related to investing but the annual COLA number for 2025 is 2.5%. Don’t spend it all in one place. 

COLA is based on the CPI-W. Of course we all know the CPI is one of the main economic indicators, and does move the market.

Social Security sets its 2025 COLA increase at 2.5%. Here's how it will change your benefits.

FTA:

Quote

The Social Security Administration set its 2025 cost-of-living adjustment at 2.5%, the smallest annual COLA hike since 2021. Although inflation has eased from its pandemic-era heights, some advocates for older Americans say the modest bump in Social Security benefits puts U.S. retirees at risk of losing financial ground. 

Thanks pricks.

The COLA is based on a metric that many (other than media propagandists and idiot politicians) people don't think is an accurate measure of inflation/costs. They would also be correct. I'm sure this will be another case of that. At the same time, you are going to get hosed anyway.  Since I've been on SS, the COLA goes up, but so does the cost of supplemental insurance. Which of course eats up all the COLA raise and then some.

**** you all very much.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/8/2024 at 12:22 AM, Screwball said:

I'm old so I want to protect my money. The market is too risky for me at this point (other than a small fund I play with to get my nuts off). I welcome these higher interest rates. You can do OK just playing short term yields, and completely risk free at the same time. If you get frisky, some corporate bonds can do even better.

Funny how the Fed tries to control interest rates, but they (rates) seem to do what they want to anyway. It's almost like there is something other than central planning, or the attempt of...

I am still half in the market (I am 62).  All the money I need before I turn 70 goes into short-term or medium-term CDs so I welcome the high rates.  I still have my long-term retirement money in a mutual fund.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

I am waiting until 70 before I collect SS.  I hope it's still there at that time.  

Good luck.

That was my plan too, but corporate America doesn't like old people so I ran out of jobs.  When you get to be in your late 50s early 60s you have a bullseye on your back. You are at the top of your pay scale, your age will make insurance costs higher, they can't train you to be an ass kissing yes man, and they can find countless foreigners on H1B visa programs to do your job at 1/3 of the rate.

See ya old man - you became too expensive. The bottom line says you need to go.

SS will be there, they will still continue to screw us with rigging the numbers. Which is why it's a good idea to plan for yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

I am still half in the market (I am 62).  All the money I need before I turn 70 goes into short-term or medium-term CDs so I welcome the high rates.  I still have my long-term retirement money in a mutual fund.   

I have everything in short term stuff. I just bought a boatload of 1 month bills the other day. I want to get past the election before committing to anything longer term.  1 month T-bills are paying decent, which I use via Treasury Direct and my savings account. The short term stuff is paying 4.5 ish but I found some corporates up around 8, which was tempting. They were also not as well rated, so there was that.

There are some decent safe plays out there playing interest rates. Going forward, and given today's CPI print, I wonder what this does to the Fed's rate cut plan? Even with the 50 bps cut the 4 week T-bill yield has changed very little according to my purchases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Screwball said:

Good luck.

That was my plan too, but corporate America doesn't like old people so I ran out of jobs.  When you get to be in your late 50s early 60s you have a bullseye on your back. You are at the top of your pay scale, your age will make insurance costs higher, they can't train you to be an ass kissing yes man, and they can find countless foreigners on H1B visa programs to do your job at 1/3 of the rate.

See ya old man - you became too expensive. The bottom line says you need to go.

SS will be there, they will still continue to screw us with rigging the numbers. Which is why it's a good idea to plan for yourself.

I try to save enough where I'll be OK if I get zero social security.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiger337 said:

I try to save enough where I'll be OK if I get zero social security.  

It will never be, but that should be everyone’s approach. Particularly the younger generations. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, 1776 said:

It will never be, but that should be everyone’s approach. Particularly the younger generations. 

I'm an old guy who is kinda into the markets, investing, saving, money management, call it what you want.

Honest question for the younger generation that may be reading this; how is financial things like we are talking about taught today?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From today's Axios

https://www.axios.com/newsletters/axios-macro-e0242ff0-87d0-11ef-bba5-0b4446cf21fa.html?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter_axiosmacro&stream=business

Quote

The big picture: The triple whammy of Hurricane Helene, Hurricane Milton, and the Boeing strike are likely to distort economic data in the coming weeks, making the usual indicators of the economy's health more difficult to dissect.

Payroll employment is likely to be depressed, along with industrial production and some measures of consumer spending, in ways that don't reflect the economy's underlying trajectory.

There is also likely to be a bounce-back surge in economic output as rebuilding occurs in the next few quarters, because in GDP arithmetic, rebuilding a destroyed building counts as a positive.

But it's hard in moments like this to know how much of any apparent weakness in the data should be chalked up to one-time effects.

State of play: We got an early sign of this with yesterday's report on jobless claims, which saw a spike fueled in part by claims in Helene-afflicted North Carolina and aerospace-heavy Washington state. (Striking workers are not eligible for unemployment benefits, but furloughed workers elsewhere in the Boeing supply chain are.)

Goldman Sachs economists estimate the Boeing strike is on track to subtract 33,000 from October job growth, and Hurricane Helene about 50,000.

This week is the "reference week" for the October jobs numbers, meaning anyone not working this week in Florida due to Milton — an hourly employee who evacuated, for example — will not count toward payroll employment.

The numbers could be affected by both people who are temporarily not working and depressed response rates to the Bureau of Labor Statistics' surveys, as the officials who usually fill them out are busy dealing with crisis conditions.

What they're saying: October jobs numbers "will likely show flat or negative growth in total employment and an increase in unemployment — to the point that we are not likely to get clean looks at the major economic data series until late 2024 or early 2025," per a note from RSM chief economist Joe Brusuelas.

Flashback: There is a useful historical analogue to the situation. In August 2005, Hurricane Katrina walloped New Orleans, followed soon after by Hurricanes Rita and Wilma. There was also a 28-day Boeing strike.

As then-Federal Reserve economist David Stockton put it in a Nov. 1 policy meeting that year, "we are now in a thick data fog that makes it difficult to separate the underlying trend in the economy from the influence of the storms."

One can hope that this part of Stockton's 2005 assessment applies in 2024 as well. He added that "we are feeling increasingly comfortable arguing that the data support our earlier view that the economy would retain its momentum this fall."

Indeed, while national job growth was weak in September and October of 2005, it bounced back in November, as the nation added a whopping 355,000 jobs.

   

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...