Jump to content

05/21/2023 1:35pm EDT Detroit Tigers vs Washington Nationals


Recommended Posts

Posted

Welp, Wentz couldn't get us out of the third. It will be up to Cisnero to work a bunch of innings. He hasn't thrown more than 31 pitches in an outing this decade. But he's probably going to throw more than that today.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Tigermojo said:

Hinch outmaneuvering the competition going from left handed batting practice to right handed batting practice with another lefty warmed up.

What should he have done instead?

Posted

One thing keeping me tuned in is remembering that these are the Washington Nationals, so on a list of all the teams that could choke up a five-run lead to lose a game, the ex-Expos is near the top of it.

Posted

Englert in. Interesting. He threw 21 pitches on Friday. I would have thought only Cisnero and Alexander since they were the only two bullpen guys who hadn't pitched yet this series.

Posted
7 minutes ago, chasfh said:

One thing keeping me tuned in is remembering that these are the Washington Nationals, so on a list of all the teams that could choke up a five-run lead to lose a game, the ex-Expos is near the top of it.

I mean in all fairness, these Tigers are also at the top of that list.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Dtrain72 said:

I mean in all fairness, these Tigers are also at the top of that list.

Also in all fairness, this issue is at hand for the Nationals right now and not the Tigers.

Posted (edited)
30 minutes ago, chasfh said:

Bases loaded, no out, no score. Jumpin' Jeebus.

that is why I'd rather have 9 ML average players than 5 good ones and 4 bad ones. Not that the Tigers even have 5 good ones, but philosophically I'm not a fan of chasing batting stars to build a lineup - just save me from the automatic outs. Work hardest to improve the worst guy in the lineup, I don't think spending the effort at top end pays off as much.

Edited by gehringer_2
Posted
7 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said:

that is why I'd rather have 9 ML average players than 5 good ones and 4 bad ones. Not that the Tigers even have 5 good ones, but philosophically I'm not a fan of chasing batting stars to build a lineup - just save me from the automatic outs. Work hardest to improve the worst guy in the lineup, I don't think spending the effort at top end pays off as much.

The Dombrowski winners were all stars-and-scrubs teams, to your point. But also as you imply, we are a long way from having anything like nine average big league players.

Posted (edited)

So, OK, we are within a slam, but also, we have guys who are still champing at the bit to be the instant hero who ties the game or puts us in the lead with one swing. But again, we are closer. That's something.

Edited by chasfh
Posted

I'm not sure why, on the sharp one-hopper to second, Maton waited to see whether the second baseman would field the ball before he committed going to third, where he was a dead duck.

Posted
12 minutes ago, chasfh said:

The Dombrowski winners were all stars-and-scrubs teams, to your point. But also as you imply, we are a long way from having anything like nine average big league players.

If you squint there might be the beginnings of some relilable guys in there. Of these team, I'm good with Baez, Greene, Tork, McKinstry; and Baddoo is turning into a decent OBP guy. The rest (Maton, Ibanez, Vierling, Haase, Rogers ) are all big question marks to me.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...