Jump to content

2023 Trade Deadline


RatkoVarda

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, 1984Echoes said:

It was only for one year.

His only value was as a trade deadline asset in 2023... that's it. After the season he's a FA so... bye bye. Actually, bye bye at the deadline.

I bet on Candy (mentally... the Tigers didn't... physically) having value at the deadline and Schoop having 0 value at the deadline so I wanted Schoop dropped from the roster.

Just my offseason viewpoint.

Candy = One Year ONLY = trade deadline asset (I thought he'd get closer to a 3.5 WAR season than the 1-ish WAR season he was being projected at...).

Schoop = Negative value = dump him, November, 2022.

IMO.

But... what do I know...?

Schoop had a guaranteed contract. Tigers aren't cutting anyone they have to pay or paying anyone to stay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Sports_Freak said:

Schoop had a guaranteed contract. Tigers aren't cutting anyone they have to pay or paying anyone to stay.

We don’t know that.  The previous regime cut ties with players with guaranteed contracts, and I would think Harris will too. Schoop apparently isn’t blocking anyone yet—seems the team doesn’t think Lipcius, Keith or Malloy are ready.  Heck, we brought Nevin back with his really poor MLB track record.

I could see Schoop getting cut in the back half of the season, if necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Tenacious D said:

We don’t know that.  The previous regime cut ties with players with guaranteed contracts, and I would think Harris will too. Schoop apparently isn’t blocking anyone yet—seems the team doesn’t think Lipcius, Keith or Malloy are ready.  Heck, we brought Nevin back with his really poor MLB track record.

I could see Schoop getting cut in the back half of the season, if necessary.

Fulmer...soon to be a FA...traded.

Soto...up for arbitration...traded

Candelario..up for arbitration..released.

Chafin...FA...unsigned

And there are several other examples. So yeah, there's a track record of not paying players and either letting them walk or trading them.

But a player under contract? Harris will keep them. So Schoop will be here all season unless some team is really hard up for a 2nd baseman. His trade value is as close to zero as it gets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Tenacious D said:

...

I could see Schoop getting cut in the back half of the season, if necessary.

I think this is a very real possibility.

I just wish it would have been done in the offseason as it (A) Opened up a spot, just like the clamoring to jettison Candy did to open up 3B for something new... (B) But I would have rather opened up 2B instead of 3B as I thought Candy the better bet to have more value in 2023 than Schoop... and the lesser defensive position to fill is 2B instead of 3B so easier to sift bodies through there trying to find the right answer. 3B obviously is more difficult due to reaction time and arm strength & accuracy requirements. (C) Schoop is worthless, IMO. I think that now and I thought that in the winter. Dead cost, paying the money no matter what... so IMO, just drop the dead weight, meaning drop Schoop from the roster... (D) Even if a trade for Malloy is lined up... Candy can be moved at the deadline if Malloy was ready, or sooner if necessary, or not at all if we needed 3B coverage the whole season. 

This was an ABSOLUTE no-brainer to me... 

But I think Sports Freak is right in that part of the off-season decision was money (committed to Schoop versus easily no commitment to Candy) instead of logic. It was a stupid decision IMO so Harris gets one strike (instead of a gold star) against him for that.

IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Sports_Freak said:

Fulmer...soon to be a FA...traded.

Soto...up for arbitration...traded

Candelario..up for arbitration..released.

Chafin...FA...unsigned

And there are several other examples. So yeah, there's a track record of not paying players and either letting them walk or trading them.

But a player under contract? Harris will keep them. So Schoop will be here all season unless some team is really hard up for a 2nd baseman. His trade value is as close to zero as it gets.

The only unfair part of this is when your team is down in the dumps it is NORMAL to trade pending FA's at the deadline, and to trade relievers at any point in time because they have little value on a team at the bottom. Also, you can't blame Chafin on Harris... Chafin CHOSE to walk and CHOSE to sign with another team. That's not on Harris that's on the crap team we had in 2022.

Candy, on the other hand...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Sports_Freak said:

But a player under contract? Harris will keep them. So Schoop will be here all season unless some team is really hard up for a 2nd baseman. His trade value is as close to zero as it gets.

Nope, he’s gone before August 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, 1984Echoes said:

The only unfair part of this is when your team is down in the dumps it is NORMAL to trade pending FA's at the deadline, and to trade relievers at any point in time because they have little value on a team at the bottom. Also, you can't blame Chafin on Harris... Chafin CHOSE to walk and CHOSE to sign with another team. That's not on Harris that's on the crap team we had in 2022.

Candy, on the other hand...

Was Chafin even offered a fair contract in Detroit? Fulmer and Chafin were mostly effective last season and there's only one reason they weren't kept around...money. Having a low payroll and maximizing profit is the goal of any business. Let's see what happens this off-season when a few contracts come off the books.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports_Freak said:

Was Chafin even offered a fair contract in Detroit? Fulmer and Chafin were mostly effective last season and there's only one reason they weren't kept around...money. Having a low payroll and maximizing profit is the goal of any business. Let's see what happens this off-season when a few contracts come off the books.

Chafin negotiated his contract and opted out after a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gehringer_2 said:

Sunk cost fallacy at work

 

More like, we gotta put a guy out there with experience who can passably play major league ball while the kids continue to develop. It's why they're not rushing Colt Keith or Justyn-Henry Malloy or Andre Lipcius or Wenceel Perez up to the majors to replace him RIGHT NOW. They're not ready, so in the meantime, we need a guy with big league experience to put out there, a guy the clock's already running on. That's Schoop. He's already paid for, and I would imagine they're still hoping against hoping to flip him for something anything at the end of the month. I wouldn't worry too much about it, though, because if he's still here on August 1st, I think there's a good chance he sits down for most of the rest of the season, basically spot-starting and pinch-hitting against lefties and being a late-inning defensive replacement at second, while Nick Maton comes back up to replace him on the field.

Not for nothing, this also dovetails into why they bring in guys like Anthony Misiewicz and Zach Logue and Garret Hill when they need pitching replacements, instead of rushing up Ty Madden and Wilmer Flores and Dylan Smith: those guys are the future, they're not ready, and the org doesn't want to **** up the development process on them like Al Avila did by rushing up TORK! There's no point to starting the clock on them now. In the meantime, the business model dictates that we have to put guys on the mound when our regulars get hurt, and those first three guys all have big league experience, such as that may be. I think we can expect to see this continue all through next year for sure, and possibly into 2025. I know it's frustrating and maybe hard to understand, but that's the reality, so might as well sit back and enjoy it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said:

Chafin was quoted by Petzold as saying Arizona's offer was 'better', so I guess you have to infer from that there was a Tiger's offer, but they wouldn't match/beat Az

Thanks.  Not really much of a loss as it turned out.  Holton replaced him for the league minimum and is cheap and controllable for a few more years, assuming he keeps his production up.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are your expectations for the return at the deadline with regard to the following players? 
My thoughts are as follows:
E-Rod (if healthy): 45+-50 prospect and some random 40ish player
Lorenzen: 40+-45 player
Cisnero: A RP prospect down in High-A maybe AA
 

All I do know is people are going to complain about whatever we do get back and claim that Harris is just Avila in a different disguise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, LongLiveMaroth said:

What are your expectations for the return at the deadline with regard to the following players? 
My thoughts are as follows:
E-Rod (if healthy): 45+-50 prospect and some random 40ish player
Lorenzen: 40+-45 player
Cisnero: A RP prospect down in High-A maybe AA
 

All I do know is people are going to complain about whatever we do get back and claim that Harris is just Avila in a different disguise.

Yes, we'll hear those complaints.  I think his approach is a little different from Avila so far, but it remains to be seen how successful he'll be.  I am trying to think positive about him until proven otherwise.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...