Jump to content

Week Two: Seattle Seahawks (0-1) @ Detroit Lions (1-0)


MichiganCardinal

Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, TP_Fan said:

3 years we’ve been hearing about cleaning up the pass defense. 

Aaron Glenn's speciality is supposed to be the secondary given that's what he played in the NFL. But even with the secondary being inconsistent and struggling at times, having zero pass rush with no QB pressure is really difficult to overcome. When a QB and offense get 4-5-6+ seconds to let plays develop and receivers get that kind of time to get open it puts the secondary in a tough position. You can only ask the secondary to hold tight coverage for so long. And against a mobile QB who can extend plays in and out of the pocket that makes things harder. The opposing QB doesn't fear our pass rush because Glenn continually rushes only 4, doesn't gets no push from the interior, and doesn't have a talent on the field besides Hutch that represents any serious threat.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, RedRamage said:

I just rewatched that last drive and it wasn't clock management. They had plenty of time to score but couldn't get the first down. They let like 20 second run off before kicking the FG.

You have to go back a bit to when the Lions got the ball. They wasted too much time on the first few plays. Didn't seem to show any urgency. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, TP_Fan said:

It’s that the lions keep losing the same way. Horrible defense. Poor execution. This was the most same ole lions game of all time. 

Nope, they played a very good team and played well enough to win, it's disappointing that they didn't, but it's not all bad. They lost the turnover battle, and that was it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Longgone said:

Nope, they played a very good team and played well enough to win, it's disappointing that they didn't, but it's not all bad. They lost the turnover battle, and that was it. 

Offensive stats on each side very close to even. You can always use more pass rush (and also having holding called....), but Seattle's overall pass D was no better than the Lions. It came down to Goff making one throw behind an open receiver -or maybe the receiver ran a sloppy route. Either way it was an unforced error and Seattle's D didn't have much to do with it but have the luck to have the D-back, who could not have broken up the play if the throw had been on target,  standing where the ball went. Add in two more losses of possession and you end up short in the end.

But the expectation the Lions would have a top D this season were never realistic. Improved, sure. Middle of the pack - maybe. But you don't go from a pretty terrible D to a great D in one off-season.

Edited by gehringer_2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, i'ts the NFL.  Who is 2-0? 

Miami & Baltimore  is it in the AFC

The NFC

Dallas, Philly, Washington, Atlanta, Tampa Bay & San Francisco   with New Orleans probably getting there tonight.  

I am pretty sure the Lions are better than Tampa, Atlanta, Washington and New Orleans

 

Gotta clean up that defense and figure out how to cover tight ends.     Looks like Jerry Jacobs is the whipping boy.   Can't wait for Moseley to get back.

 

I'll stick by what I said earlier.  This loss, in the long run, might be good.  Bring 'em back down to earth and make them prove how good they are.    Of course they were buying into the hype, they're human.   

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, RedRamage said:

I just rewatched that last drive and it wasn't clock management. They had plenty of time to score but couldn't get the first down. They let like 20 second run off before kicking the FG.

This reads to me as though clock management was at least some of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, chasfh said:

This reads to me as though clock management was at least some of it.

I didn't get that feeling at all. They had time and time outs left. They ran out of downs. I said they let time run because they wanted the FG try to be the last play of the game. Ideally I would have liked to see more than 23 seconds left, but they had time outs and would have been inside the red zone if they had gotten a First Down.  That would have been enough time to score.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RedRamage said:

That's the real reason we lost right there!

(I did see at least two fans with masks on.)

Honestly, I expected the stadium to be 130 decibels and for Seattle to get flustered early. Instead they marched down the field and scored from the opening kickoff. Then they scored from our opening kickoff in the second half. 

Edited by Jason_R
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jason_R said:

Honestly, I expected the stadium to be 130 decibels and for Seattle to get flustered early. Instead they marched down the field and scored from the opening kickoff. Then they scored from our opening kickoff in the second half. 

I'm nitpicking and playing also playing with hindsight, but I kinda wondered if it might not have been better to start off with the ball instead of giving it to Seattle. Obviously I don't think we expected the defense to be that poor, but it might have been nice to march down the field and get a TD ourselves to start the game and set the pace.

(Obviously there's also a chance we go 3-and-out, get the crowd grumbling, and then watch Seattle score AND get the ball to start the second half... in which case I'd be on here complaining that they should have kicked off to start...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RedRamage said:

I'm nitpicking and playing also playing with hindsight, but I kinda wondered if it might not have been better to start off with the ball instead of giving it to Seattle. Obviously I don't think we expected the defense to be that poor, but it might have been nice to march down the field and get a TD ourselves to start the game and set the pace.

(Obviously there's also a chance we go 3-and-out, get the crowd grumbling, and then watch Seattle score AND get the ball to start the second half... in which case I'd be on here complaining that they should have kicked off to start...)

Also, in retrospect, Montgomery shouldn’t have fumbled the first snap of the second half. 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone thinking the defense has improved is kidding themselves.  This will be another season of needing to outscore the opponent.  And absolutely can’t have any mistakes. The defense can’t get off the field and there is no interior pass rush threat outside of Hutchinson who is being double and triple teamed because no one else can get pressure.

The division sucks so there will be a good opportunity to win it, but the scheme is so bad the lions will be fighting it all year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TP_Fan said:

Anyone thinking the defense has improved is kidding themselves.  This will be another season of needing to outscore the opponent.  And absolutely can’t have any mistakes. The defense can’t get off the field and there is no interior pass rush threat outside of Hutchinson who is being double and triple teamed because no one else can get pressure.

The division sucks so there will be a good opportunity to win it, but the scheme is so bad the lions will be fighting it all year.  

In 2022, the defense absolutely improved over the season. That's objectively true. That doesn't mean the defense was good or great by the end of the year, but it was improved.

In 2023 we have two samples:
Sample 1: They held the defending SB champs to 316 yards. They had a key take away that provided 1/3 of the scoring for the team. They pressured the QB constantly. Yes they also got "lucky" with the drops and without having to face Kelce, but they also got "unlucky" with the OL in illegal formations and false starting constantly.

Sample 2: They allowed 393 (some of which came in overtime). They were working on a short field at times, but hardly got any pressure on the QB, allowed WAY too many 3rd downs to convert and couldn't seem to cover receivers. And this while going up against a very depleted Seahawks OL.

So, in 2023, the question is which game is more like the real defense? Time will tell.

It honestly felt like to me that the defense just expected to be good against Seattle. They just expected that Smith would be pressured all the time and so didn't have to do much game planning. Now, this is just an uneducated fan's opinion, so take it for what it's worth.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sports_Freak said:

You have to go back a bit to when the Lions got the ball. They wasted too much time on the first few plays. Didn't seem to show any urgency. 

Campbell was playing for the tie which was especially odd because he was unnecessarily aggressive on multiple occasions during the game and should have been more aggressive on the final possession. I didn't understand it at all at the time especially with the way the Lions offense was moving the ball.

I didn't have a problem with him kicking the FG on 4th down, it was more of the conservative playcalling and clock bleeding earlier in the possession that I didn't get.

Edited by NYLion
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One more thing I will say about yesterday is that it sucks that we lost but I did like how the team and Goff responded after the devastating pick 6.

I feel like in the past we would've just folded after that but instead Goff responded with a perfect drive and then the defense played its best series of the game. 

Too bad it was all for naught but still I do think them bouncing back like that instead of just laying over and dying should be noted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RandyMarsh said:

One more thing I will say about yesterday is that it sucks that we lost but I did like how the team and Goff responded after the devastating pick 6.

I feel like in the past we would've just folded after that but instead Goff responded with a perfect drive and then the defense played its best series of the game. 

Too bad it was all for naught but still I do think them bouncing back like that instead of just laying over and dying should be noted. 

The definitely persevered. I think they would have won if they won the toss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...