Jump to content

Fiscal Fitness: Taxes, Budgets, and the Economy


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Screwball said:

 

I don't mind Congress Critters being well paid - there are a lot of places in the Country where $250K is not great shakes for a professional. But the payback ought to be tighter financial ethics rules and an end to private money campaign finance slush funds. I know - dream on.....

Edited by gehringer_2
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

LOL - tonight Wapo is reporting that the Congressional pay raise was stripped from the bill and it was not 40%, it was a 3.8% cost of living bump - $6.6K   I wonder if some reporter or social media maven last week couldn't locate a decimal point....

Edited by gehringer_2
Posted

Who managed the WH after 1/20, Trump or the unelected guy who falsified his papers to get into the country?

Does Trump have buyer’s remorse yet. Once again  bad businesses deal, much like what the natives sold Manhattan Island for

Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said:

Who managed the WH after 1/20, Trump or the unelected guy who falsified his papers to get into the country?

Does Trump have buyer’s remorse yet. Once again  bad businesses deal, much like what the natives sold Manhattan Island for

IDK, If Trump throws Elon overboard, DJT walks away debt free with the result of all of Elon's election spending and twitter manipulation to get him elected. Could be the best deal he ever made.

Edited by gehringer_2
Posted
15 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said:

IDK, If Trump throws Elon overboard, DJT walks away debt free with the result of all of Elon's election spending and twitter manipulation to get him elected. Could be the best deal he ever made.

And it won’t be the first time he stiffed a buyer

Posted
21 minutes ago, Screwball said:

Elon didn't get Trump elected, the democrats did.

I suppose you can say that in any election where the sides change, but given the retention in the House and he small loss in the Senate in an already unfavorable year (more Dems seats at play), the party didn't fair as badly as the top of the ticket. Obviously the high level of enthusiasm Harris generated among the party faithful wasn't translating beyond it. You can as easily and maybe more accurately blame the loss on Biden for not realizing soon enough he would not be a viable candidate. If there had been a full democratic primary season the candidate that emerged might have had broader appeal. But I think that argument is more attractive in hindsight than in reality - when a party primary tosses a VP that's usually a party too fractured to win anyway. Heck, maybe the die was already cast when Biden won the primary in 2020 and made Harris his VP. Biden's age and likelihood his VP would end up the next candidate, Harris' lack of broader appeal were all known issues then if anyone had wanted to recognize them.

Posted
19 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said:

I suppose you can say that in any election where the sides change, but given the retention in the House and he small loss in the Senate in an already unfavorable year (more Dems seats at play), the party didn't fair as badly as the top of the ticket. Obviously the high level of enthusiasm Harris generated among the party faithful wasn't translating beyond it. You can as easily and maybe more accurately blame the loss on Biden for not realizing soon enough he would not be a viable candidate. If there had been a full democratic primary season the candidate that emerged might have had broader appeal. But I think that argument is more attractive in hindsight than in reality - when a party primary tosses a VP that's usually a party too fractured to win anyway. Heck, maybe the die was already cast when Biden won the primary in 2020 and made Harris his VP. Biden's age and likelihood his VP would end up the next candidate, Harris' lack of broader appeal were all known issues then if anyone had wanted to recognize them.

They lost to a reality show circus clown - twice.  Maybe it's time they look in the mirror instead of blaming everyone but themselves.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, CMRivdogs said:

Who managed the WH after 1/20, Trump or the unelected guy who falsified his papers to get into the country?

Does Trump have buyer’s remorse yet. Once again  bad businesses deal, much like what the natives sold Manhattan Island for

It is going to be a long four years for some folks….

Posted
1 hour ago, CMRivdogs said:

The two losses came to a woman, one was a woman of color. That tells you a lot about the American electorate.

Maybe just maybe their ideals did not line up with the voters? always the victim…

Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, Screwball said:

They lost to a reality show circus clown - twice.  Maybe it's time they look in the mirror instead of blaming everyone but themselves.

I blame Republican voters for electing Republicans.   They chose a reality circus clown 3 times.  Thats alot of primary elections a circus clown won.

Edited by pfife
Posted
23 hours ago, Screwball said:

They lost to a reality show circus clown - twice.  Maybe it's time they look in the mirror instead of blaming everyone but themselves.

Yup.  That is an epic failure on their part. That's what I tell them when they call me up asking for donations.  

 

Posted
22 hours ago, Tiger337 said:

Yup.  That is an epic failure on their part. That's what I tell them when they call me up asking for donations.  

 

And the moral is, don't run a woman candidate for president. After all, Jill Stein hasn't won yet, has she?

  • Confused 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...