Jump to content

2024 MLB Thread


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, SeattleMike said:

Not only did they never win a WS (which can be forgiven) they never won 100 games or were considered the best team in baseball in any particular year. Those were fun years, but, in retrospect, the results were a bit underwhelming. 

and yet, everyone seems to think jim leyland was a brilliant manager...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, buddha said:

and yet, everyone seems to think jim leyland was a brilliant manager...

He was viewed as brilliant in 2006, but not as much after that.  I recall him being viewed as someone who was tough but knew and cared about his players much like Anderson.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

He was viewed as brilliant in 2006, but not as much after that.  I recall him being viewed as someone who was tough but knew and cared about his players much like Anderson.   

No manager is going to look brilliant for long when his GM gives him lousy bullpens to work with. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Tiger337 said:

He was viewed as brilliant in 2006, but not as much after that.  I recall him being viewed as someone who was tough but knew and cared about his players much like Anderson.   

i get the impression sparky was viewed as ahead of his time vis a vis bullpen usage.

leyland was great at controlling the clubhouse and keeping players happy.  that's a really good skill.

but in game?  lineups?  pitching management?  not the best, imo.  and those tigers teams underachieved other than 2006, that group overachieved.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, buddha said:

especially when he doesnt know how to use them...

Leyland gave me the impression he had a sort of passive aggressive streak with the way he used BP pitchers - it was like he felt he had to keep signaling to DD "you can keep giving me these guys, but I'm not hiding them, they are going to get used even if we lose"

Edited by gehringer_2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, buddha said:

i get the impression sparky was viewed as ahead of his time vis a vis bullpen usage.

leyland was great at controlling the clubhouse and keeping players happy.  that's a really good skill.

but in game?  lineups?  pitching management?  not the best, imo.  and those tigers teams underachieved other than 2006, that group overachieved.

yeah, Anderson was "Captain Hook", but his 85 and 86 teams underachieved.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, buddha said:

i get the impression sparky was viewed as ahead of his time vis a vis bullpen usage.

Roger Craig  could squeeze performance out of starters and BP arms. Once he left Sparky's pitching management was hum-drum. The worst was that Sparky would leave a guy sitting in the BP for days in a row then call him in at high leverage.

Edited by gehringer_2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding Leyland's run, while it is true they never won 100 or a WS, I believe the Tigers had the best overall W-L record from 2006-2014. I've been a fan since Campy threw his bat at Lagrow and endured several rebuilds. Imho that stretch from 2006-2014 was an elite stretch. Every season I felt they had a chance to win it all. Damn Big Papi!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thnking about Sparky, I'll tell you what I think his biggest failing was, it was not using his credibility and stature to go to his owner than him that the management he had in place was doing a bush league job and needed to be replaced. It was funny because he took a stand against league management when the strike came, but he wouldn't do it for the sale of baseball in Detroit when he could have earlier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, monkeytargets39 said:

Trout done for the year with a meniscus tear.  
 

Probably safe to say he’s not gonna get to the elite career hitting milestones at this point

In the last four years — and I’m not counting 2020 — Trout has played in 36, 119, 82, and 29 games. What a downer for Angels fans.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Tiger337 said:

yeah, Anderson was "Captain Hook", but his 85 and 86 teams underachieved.  

Both the hitting and pitching coaches departed after 1984. (Craig and Brown) I’ve never thought this received enough attention after 1984. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, monkeytargets39 said:

Trout done for the year with a meniscus tear.  
 

Probably safe to say he’s not gonna get to the elite career hitting milestones at this point

Will he still be first ballot, or will this injury streak be held against him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, casimir said:

Will he still be first ballot, or will this injury streak be held against him?

He’s still first ballot.  He was one of the best players in the league for several years. If anything it might depend on who else is eligible at the time.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, monkeytargets39 said:

He’s still first ballot.  He was one of the best players in the league for several years. If anything it might depend on who else is eligible at the time.  

Six times leading the league in OPS+ is going to get anyone a lot of votes, but they'll still be folks who think the counting stats are not enough (<2000 hits, <400 HR through the rabbit ball era)  - but he's still got time to work on that if he can put together a couple more healthy years.

Edited by gehringer_2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said:

Six times leading the league in OPS+ is going to get anyone a lot of votes, but they'll still be folks who think the counting stats are not enough (<2000 hits, <400 HR through the rabbit ball era)  - but he's still got time to work on that if he can put together a couple more healthy years.

One more mediocre year out of him gets him 400 HRs, 1000 RBIs and 1000 walks and a shot at 1.000 career ops.  I think that gets him in considering a good amount of his prime was lost to injuries.

11 all stars, 3 mvps, led the league at least once in runs, rbis, sbs, bbs, average, obp, ops, ops+, war…. There are plenty of folks that got in easily that didn’t have that resume.

Edited by monkeytargets39
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me Trout is a no brainer first ballot HOF if he retires tomorrow. Was the best player in the world for almost a decade, has 3MVPs and another 2 runner ups. His career OPS+ of 173 is only topped by Ruth, Williams, Bonds, Gehrig and Hornsby. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trout is a first ballot Hall of Famer right now.  The voters are more sophisticated than they were 20 years ago.  They know he's one of the all-time greats.  Kirby Pucket was a short career first ballot guy and he is not even close to Trout.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      285
    • Most Online
      625

    Newest Member
    Hinchman11
    Joined
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...