Tigeraholic1 Posted January 5 Posted January 5 Just now, mtutiger said: As has been mentioned before (and as you have ignored), vets seem fine with the VA as is per per polling. Why change anything if the users like the end product? What's the benefit? I saw a ton of polls leading up to 2024 election too. Quote
CMRivdogs Posted January 5 Posted January 5 Just now, Tigeraholic1 said: I saw a ton of polls leading up to 2024 election too. Never a direct answer to a question. Always a deflection Quote
mtutiger Posted January 5 Posted January 5 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Tigeraholic1 said: I saw a ton of polls leading up to 2024 election too. Pew nailed the 2024 election in terms of the popular vote nationally... and in their 2023 polling (shown below), they have the VA with a 56-28 favorable-unfavorable rating nationally. So, I ask again... Why change anything if the users like the end product? What's the benefit? Edited January 5 by mtutiger Quote
Tigeraholic1 Posted January 5 Posted January 5 (edited) lol I am glad you guys get some aggression out interacting with me. If not you would be patting each other on the back with group outrage towards the right. Glad I could be at some service.. Edited January 5 by Tigeraholic1 Quote
pfife Posted January 5 Posted January 5 if only the dems had a primary, then magaholic wouldn't be here projecting Quote
Tigeraholic1 Posted January 5 Posted January 5 3 minutes ago, pfife said: if only the dems had a primary, then magaholic wouldn't be here projecting Now you see the light! Awesome bub. Quote
romad1 Posted January 5 Author Posted January 5 I'm not sure why veterans wouldn't want an agency doing specialized research on veteran's specific health issues. The Las Vegas MAGA who killed himself in that godawful vehicle was suffering from PTSD and other mental health issues -- besides these post-incident reports of that mental illness -- were clearly demonstrated his committing suicide in the worst vehicle by cost thus far in the history of mankind. The poor fellow was also deluded to think MAGA was going to somehow help Ukraine. My father relies on the VA for most of his healthcare and seems to think the hospitals in western Michigan are responsive to his needs. Quote
mtutiger Posted January 5 Posted January 5 7 hours ago, Tigeraholic1 said: lol I am glad you guys get some aggression out interacting with me. If not you would be patting each other on the back with group outrage towards the right. Glad I could be at some service.. Posting polling data which conflicts with your views on the VA and challenging you to answer basic questions is "aggression"? Quote
pfife Posted January 5 Posted January 5 8 hours ago, Tigeraholic1 said: Now you see the light! Awesome bub. Nice admission of your projecting. Quote
Tigeraholic1 Posted January 5 Posted January 5 (edited) 12 hours ago, CMRivdogs said: Citation please. Show your work WASHINGTON, D.C. – This week, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released its analysis of the cost to taxpayers of Vice President Kamala Harris’ open border agenda on the Medicaid program. CBO estimates that the Biden-Harris Administration’s open border agenda cost federal and state taxpayers more than $16.2 billionto provide Medicaid-funded emergency services to illegal aliens since taking office. This is a staggering increase of 124% compared to the same period under the Trump Administration. https://budget.house.gov/press-release/cbo-medicaid-spending-on-illegal-aliens-has-cost-taxpayers-over-162-billion-under-open-border-czar-harris#:~:text=Download PDF-,CBO%3A Medicaid Spending on Illegal Aliens Has Cost Taxpayers over,Under Open Border Czar Harris Edited January 5 by Tigeraholic1 Quote
CMRivdogs Posted January 5 Posted January 5 44 minutes ago, Tigeraholic1 said: WASHINGTON, D.C. – This week, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released its analysis of the cost to taxpayers of Vice President Kamala Harris’ open border agenda on the Medicaid program. CBO estimates that the Biden-Harris Administration’s open border agenda cost federal and state taxpayers more than $16.2 billionto provide Medicaid-funded emergency services to illegal aliens since taking office. This is a staggering increase of 124% compared to the same period under the Trump Administration. https://budget.house.gov/press-release/cbo-medicaid-spending-on-illegal-aliens-has-cost-taxpayers-over-162-billion-under-open-border-czar-harris#:~:text=Download PDF-,CBO%3A Medicaid Spending on Illegal Aliens Has Cost Taxpayers over,Under Open Border Czar Harris A press release from the GOP. Great Quote
Tiger337 Posted January 5 Posted January 5 12 hours ago, Tigeraholic1 said: I saw a ton of polls leading up to 2024 election too. The polls seemed to be pretty. Some of the analysis wasn't. Quote
Tigeraholic1 Posted January 5 Posted January 5 7 minutes ago, CMRivdogs said: A press release from the GOP. Great If the left is telling you those costs are out of line show us. Please show your work. 😂 Quote
romad1 Posted January 5 Author Posted January 5 (edited) The real challenge to Democracy will be if the auditors and IGs are infected by MAGAs. Every fact will have to be a MAGA-approved fact then. 2+2 will be whatever Big Brother says. Edited January 5 by romad1 Quote
CMRivdogs Posted January 5 Posted January 5 Senator Sheldon Whitehouse @whitehouse.senate.gov Follow Here’s a timely phrase: “a parasitical oligarchy devouring the happiness of the many to feed the pleasures of the few” — and now about to be using the powers of government. January 5, 2025 at 3:32 PM https://bsky.app/profile/whitehouse.senate.gov/post/3lezhnzvhbk2d Quote
Tigeraholic1 Posted January 5 Posted January 5 29 minutes ago, pfife said: lol "border czar" Right? Another thing she failed at. Quote
CMRivdogs Posted January 5 Posted January 5 4 minutes ago, Tigeraholic1 said: Well, I never been to heaven But I been to Oklahoma Well, they tell me I was born there But I really don't remember In Oklahoma, not Arizona What does it matter? What does it matter? Quote
Tigeraholic1 Posted January 5 Posted January 5 The Democrats’ claim that Kamala Harris wasn’t President Biden’s border czar borders on the bizarre. It contradicts everything the administration has said or done on immigration since Harris’s was given this ill-fated mission more than three years ago https://thehill.com/opinion/immigration/4813704-kamala-harris-border-czar-denial/amp/ Quote
romad1 Posted January 6 Author Posted January 6 ⚠️ In response to Musk changing the X algorithm to deboost negative content, people asked Grok what is considered “negative” and were told: • Criticism of the government • Commentary about misinformation • Suggestion the public is being manipulated • Attacks against powerful people or institutions Quote
Tigeraholic1 Posted January 6 Posted January 6 4 minutes ago, romad1 said: ⚠️ In response to Musk changing the X algorithm to deboost negative content, people asked Grok what is considered “negative” and were told: • Criticism of the government • Commentary about misinformation • Suggestion the public is being manipulated • Attacks against powerful people or institutions Got anything but SS Jersey telling you this? 🤣 Quote
Tiger337 Posted January 6 Posted January 6 10 hours ago, Tiger337 said: The polls seemed to be pretty. Some of the analysis wasn't. Well, they weren't pretty! But they were fairly accurate on the whole. Democrats were saying there were a lot of junk polls making it look like Trump ws doing better than he was, but that wasn't the case. Quote
mtutiger Posted January 6 Posted January 6 10 hours ago, Tigeraholic1 said: Got anything but SS Jersey telling you this? 🤣 I have no idea what this means... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.