Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, MichiganCardinal said:

If Ohio State wins the National Championship, I can’t decide if I’ll get the Ohio Staters in my life a “University of Michigan back-to-back National Championship” apparel, or “Ohio State University 2024 4th Place in Big Ten” apparel.

The former will piss them off more, but I think the latter is funnier.

4th place, all day long!

Posted
14 hours ago, Hongbit said:

Stupid is the man who bets on Ryan Day

I am stupid

nyah bro.  osu -6 baby!  winner winner chicken dinner.

they open -9.5 against notre dame.

Posted

texas deserved that loss.  pin it right on sark's head for trying to get cute on the goaline.  running wide on second down killed them.  RUN IT STRONG.  

michigan spends 4 (really 3) years showing you how to beat ohio state and still everyone wants to drop back 30 times a game.

we'll see if notre dame has figured it out.  probably not considering how they played against similarly weak penn state.  run the damn ball.  and tell ryan day his team is too soft to beat you.

i hate osu (and notre dame) but back to back big ten champs would be cool.  

Posted
53 minutes ago, buddha said:

texas deserved that loss.  pin it right on sark's head for trying to get cute on the goaline.  running wide on second down killed them.  RUN IT STRONG.  

michigan spends 4 (really 3) years showing you how to beat ohio state and still everyone wants to drop back 30 times a game.

we'll see if notre dame has figured it out.  probably not considering how they played against similarly weak penn state.  run the damn ball.  and tell ryan day his team is too soft to beat you.

i hate osu (and notre dame) but back to back big ten champs would be cool.  

While I do agree to an extent, Michigan is so in Day’s head (and thus the whole team is tight-  see 2 missed field goals, picks, etc) I don’t think the results are necessarily the same against any other team. I say this as someone who’s been a lifelong Buckeye fan who is going to be rooting for the upset as the only team I’ve come to root for more is ND (since my son is a graduate and his fiancé graduates this year)

Posted

I don’t have anything against Notre Dame. I grew up in Indiana and my parents lived in South Bend for much of their lives before they moved to the small town I grew up in so rooting for Notre Dame was never hard for me.

A lot of ordinary people in South Bend, though, saw Notre Dame students as bratty, entitled rich kids, and while my parents agreed with that assessment they were tolerant of my childish enthusiasm for the team that made they themselves roll their eyes. 

But in the late 1950s and early 60s, when I became aware of sports, the befouling temper tantrums of Woody Hayes rubbed me the wrong way so I always rooted for Michigan against Ohio State — even though I didn’t technically have any skin in the game — and I will easily root for Notre Dame against Ohio State. 

Posted
19 hours ago, Deleterious said:

I will probably pull for ND. It will drive Brian Kelly nuts if they win. 

It's the small things.

I don’t like ND, particularly after they swept the Declan Sullivan wrongful death directly attributable to Brian Kelly’s decision under the rug,  Having said that, because this should be a burr in his ass, I don’t mind them being the runner up this season.

Posted

So the department of education says title ix applies to NIL.  lol.

so now your nil money has to be equitably distributed between mens and womens sports.  

bwaaaahaahaa.  let the cheating RECOMMENCE!

Posted
1 hour ago, buddha said:

So the department of education says title ix applies to NIL.  lol.

so now your nil money has to be equitably distributed between mens and womens sports.  

bwaaaahaahaa.  let the cheating RECOMMENCE!

Isn't it only of the $20.5 mil that the schools were going to be able to allocate themselves?  Still huge, especially for group of 5 schools, but doesn't change anything from the current system does it?

Posted
3 hours ago, 4hzglory said:

Isn't it only of the $20.5 mil that the schools were going to be able to allocate themselves?  Still huge, especially for group of 5 schools, but doesn't change anything from the current system does it?

isn't that the new thing, that the schools can start paying athletes out of their income instead of outside money? (i.e. the $20M) Isn't the whole idea being to get off the unsustainable NIL rat race? If it's the schools money it seems title IX was bound to apply. But as I recall the deal with the judge did include funds to women's sports. Heck - Title IX has been in place for years and they still put a ton more resource into FB than anything else. 🤷‍♀️

Posted

Not a chance the equal distribution holds up under the new administration.    Honestly, I’m not so sure that Title IX will  continue to exist.  

Side note is that players can get 3rd party NIL that won’t affect their schools cap.  NCAA is  creating a group to vet anything over $600 to ensure they are real and meet fair market value and not a pay to play scheme to circumvent the cap.  

Posted
28 minutes ago, Hongbit said:

NCAA is  creating a group to vet anything over $600 to ensure they are real and meet fair market value and not a pay to play scheme to circumvent the cap.

I'm sure this system is going to work out well.

  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...