Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, chasfh said:

Keep it up, Wenceel Perez, and I might start coming around on you.

Gotta work on this, though ...

image.png.5271eb789a56edc8f585be2c846288b4.png

But his LSTF rate is .750. 😁😁

Edited by Sports_Freak
Posted
1 minute ago, monkeytargets39 said:

Everyone is so focused on prospect upgrades from possible deadline deals that we are ignoring the biggest way we can improve the team:

 

replace Faedo and Wentz (and Maeda) with capable relief pitchers.

The pitching in Toledo is horrendous. They don't have anything down there.

Posted
32 minutes ago, Sports_Freak said:

Fido sucks

From what I've seen, he's usually great when he comes into the game. It's when he hits the dugout and comes back to the mound he sucks.

Posted
Just now, kdog said:

The pitching in Toledo is horrendous. They don't have anything down there.

I just mean heading into next season.  There’s not much we can do about it now unless some waiver wire possibilities come up around and after the deadline 

Posted
1 minute ago, gehringer_2 said:

why do you even pitch to Jose once you are behind 2-0? The art of pitching around guys is one thing this team has lost.

Have we ever had that art?

 

We let Nelson Cruz terrorize us for a decade

Posted
30 minutes ago, monkeytargets39 said:

I’m of the opinion that we should try to sell high on him in a deadline package.  

I don't think we'd get much for him, at least not in a headline deal. He's barely out of the prospect stage himself, so he doesn't have the track record for that. He could possibly sweeten a Flaherty or (god help us) a Skubal deal, but I don't know if either we nor a buyer would want that.

Posted
3 minutes ago, chasfh said:

I don't think we'd get much for him, at least not in a headline deal. He's barely out of the prospect stage himself, so he doesn't have the track record for that. He could possibly sweeten a Flaherty or (god help us) a Skubal deal, but I don't know if either we nor a buyer would want that.

I don't get the constant drive to swap away every player that starts producing. Isn't the whole point to develop players who produce so you can have them on *your* team? In baseball the grass is almost never actually greener on the other side.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, gehringer_2 said:

I don't get the constant drive to swap away every player that starts producing. Isn't the whole point to develop players who produce so you can have them on *your* team? In baseball the grass is almost never actually greener on the other side.

If we're trading Perez it would have to be like the Paredes for Meadows deal. Trading him for a more established, higher level player. That trade obviously backfired terribly, but that would be the archetype. I don't see that as all that likely.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...