Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

One more starter, one reliever and one right handed hitter is exactly what I expect the Tigers to get the rest of the off-season and they don't have to be free agent signings.  They won't necessarily be as good as Bregman, Sasaki and Yates.  In fact, that seems like an unlikely scenario.

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 12/25/2024 at 1:34 AM, Motor City Sonics said:

Wow, Bregman really thinks he's better than he is.   Now I get it, you ask for more than you want so you can appear like you are "coming down" to match an offer.   But 11 years and $350? .    Even if the nutso Mets and Dodgers wanted a 3rd baseman, with the way they throw money around, wouldn't bite on that.  

Expand  

Yep.  I’m sure Scott Boros came up with  fair market number and Bregman told him to no way that he wants more because he’s better than that.  

Posted
  On 12/26/2024 at 2:35 PM, Tiger337 said:

I don't think Bregman would be a disaster in Comerica.  He'll lose a few homers, but might get more hits.  As long as he gets his walk rate back up, he'll be fine.  I would count on Harris and his team to have a good theory as to why he was swinging more last year and use that in deciding whether ot not to pursue him.   

Expand  

A lot of risk and uncertainty to commit 7+ years and $200M+ to.  My heart wants him to sign, but my head says no.  Not sure where my spleen stands on this.

  • Haha 1
Posted
  On 12/26/2024 at 5:04 PM, Tenacious D said:

A lot of risk and uncertainty to commit 7+ years and $200M+ to.  My heart wants him to sign, but my head says no.  Not sure where my spleen stands on this.

Expand  

There is always going to be a lot of risk and uncertainty when you sign a good free agent.  If you ever want to sign a top free agent, you'll have to take that risk.  A lot if is timing.  Some people think the Tigers aren't ready to take that risk because they aren't yet in a position where one one player is necessearily going to make the difference.  On the other hand, they have two more years of the best pitcher in baseball, so maybe now is the time.  

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 12/26/2024 at 5:17 PM, Tiger337 said:

There is always going to be a lot of risk and uncertainty when you sign a good free agent.  If you ever want to sign a top free agent, you'll have to take that risk.  A lot if is timing.  Some people think the Tigers aren't ready to take that risk because they aren't yet in a position where one one player is necessearily going to make the difference.  On the other hand, they have two more years of the best pitcher in baseball, so maybe now is the time.  

Expand  

Agree with the risk, but it varies. Bregman wants to be paid like his best seasons, but he had a drop off last year and is 30.  Was last season an anomaly or sign of his decline?  The Astros moving away from him is pretty telling, in my opinion.  He was like a Whitaker of Trammell to that organization and they decided he wasn’t worth what he was asking.  They got the benefit of his best play, most of it during his arbitration, team controlled years.  And now we’re going to reward him for his decline? I wouldn’t make that commitment.

Posted
  On 12/26/2024 at 5:31 PM, Tenacious D said:

Agree with the risk, but it varies. Bregman wants to be paid like his best seasons, but he had a drop off last year and is 30.  Was last season an anomaly or sign of his decline?  The Astros moving away from him is pretty telling, in my opinion.  He was like a Whitaker of Trammell to that organization and they decided he wasn’t worth what he was asking.  They got the benefit of his best play, most of it during his arbitration, team controlled years.  And now we’re going to reward him for his decline? I wouldn’t make that commitment.

Expand  

It's not our money. And it's also not like the Tigers would use that money to sign somebody else. Spend it on him or save it, that's our 2 options. As fans, we should want the Tigers to try to fill their needs with quality players. If it doesn't work out, at least they tried. And it's not like we got value from the last Miggy contract or the Javy contract.

Posted
  On 12/26/2024 at 8:50 PM, Sports_Freak said:

It's not our money.
 

And it's not like we got value from the last Miggy contract or the Javy contract.

Expand  

At some point very soon, we will want to have the payroll flexibility to extend Skubal, Greene and Carpenter, among others, as well as potentially acquire future less risky free agents.  

Your second point is the reason that Bregman gives me pause.  If he deteriorates quickly, he’ll take an important roster spot and potentially block someone else.

I’d be more excited about him had he not shown signs of slipping in his walk year.

Posted
  On 12/26/2024 at 9:01 PM, Tenacious D said:

At some point very soon, we will want to have the payroll flexibility to extend Skubal, Greene and Carpenter, among others, as well as potentially acquire future less risky free agents.  

Your second point is the reason that Bregman gives me pause.  If he deteriorates quickly, he’ll take an important roster spot and potentially block someone else.

I’d be more excited about him had he not shown signs of slipping in his walk year.

Expand  

If he wouldn't have shown signs of slipping, he would have already been signed by a big market team. As for signing Skubal or Greene when they become free agents or extending them beforehand? They'll be walking before the Tigers spend that kind of money. That's why it's important to draft and develop well so we have replacements ready. Spend money or bank it, that's the Tigers 2 choices. And so far, they're saving it.

Posted
  On 12/27/2024 at 3:07 PM, chasfh said:

Does this mean Colt Keith moves to first and Tork is essentially out? Or does this mean Torres is going to take reps at first and Tork is essentially out?

Expand  

It means Tork is in, and they have options around the infield 

Posted

He's been a minus 2B if you believe FG, and defense had been a priority of this regime, so I'm a little iffy on what his role is going to be, exactly. Maybe they see something we think we can fix, because I would be surprised to learn that Scott Harris is punting on defense just to get a somewhat above league average bat at 2B.

I don't see anything yet on our commitment to him, but FG pegged him at 3/54, and I think I might be a little surprised to see us committing three full years to him. He had a down year this year, so who knows, he may have taken 2/40 with a team option. Just spitballing on this.

Posted
  On 12/27/2024 at 3:09 PM, Longgone said:

It means Tork is in, and they have options around the infield 

Expand  

The Tigers have needed a 3rd baseman ever since Harris took over and let Candelario walk. He got Vierling, a decent player but not All Star caliber. Another 2nd baseman in our system? Options around the infield? Maybe at 2nd base but we still need a RH bat for either 3rd base or RF. And SS is a question mark. We didn't sign Torres to fill a need, 2nd base was covered. We signed him because he was available. Let Hinch figure it out.

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 12/27/2024 at 3:15 PM, chasfh said:

He's been a minus 2B if you believe FG, and defense had been a priority of this regime, so I'm a little iffy on what his role is going to be, exactly. Maybe they see something we think we can fix, because I would be surprised to learn that Scott Harris is punting on defense just to get a somewhat above league average bat at 2B.

I don't see anything yet on our commitment to him, but FG pegged him at 3/54, and I think I might be a little surprised to see us committing three full years to him. He had a down year this year, so who knows, he may have taken 2/40 with a team option. Just spitballing on this.

Expand  

"9:03am: It’s a one-year, $15MM deal, ESPN’s Jesse Rogers reports. Torres is expected to be Detroit’s primary second baseman."

https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2024/12/tigers-sign-gleyber-torres.html

 

Posted
  On 12/27/2024 at 3:17 PM, Sports_Freak said:

The Tigers have needed a 3rd baseman ever since Harris took over and let Candelario walk. He got Vierling, a decent player but not All Star caliber. Another 2nd baseman in our system? Options around the infield? Maybe at 2nd base but we still need a RH bat for either 3rd base or RF. And SS is a question mark. We didn't sign Torres to fill a need, 2nd base was covered. We signed him because he was available. Let Hinch figure it out.

Expand  

I'm pretty sure Hinch was 100% in on the deal and he and Harris already worked out the potential configurations before they signed Torres.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...