Cruzer1 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) 2 years 35 million. Great deal. Flaherty. Edited 6 hours ago by Cruzer1 Quote
monkeytargets39 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) Beautiful. 2 year deal for Flaherty for 35 mil. Opt out after the first year. I like our rotation now. Skubal/Flaherty/Olsen/Cobb/Jobe or Mize. That will be verrry competitive in the ALC this year. Edited 6 hours ago by monkeytargets39 Quote
KL2 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 minute ago, Cruzer1 said: 2 years 35 million. Great deal. Flaherty. Really just one 25. No way he doesn't opt out. Quote
monkeytargets39 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 minute ago, KL2 said: Really just one 25. No way he doesn't opt out. I’m good with that because it buys us time with Jobes progression, gives us a year to see how SGL returns from injury, and gives us one more year to decide what to do with the likes of Mize/Manning/Montero/Hurter. Quote
oblong Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Rosenthal said 2nd year goes to $20 if he makes 15 starts which he should. If he doesn’t… then he probably will not opt out. Quote
Tiger337 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Flaherty gets 2 years, $35 million. Great deal for the Tigers! 2 Quote
gehringer_2 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago This is not a that large an economic commitment, I wonder if an offer to Bregman remains on the table. Quote
chasfh Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Flaherty at 2/35. I don’t love the player opt out, but yeah, I’m down. Quote
chasfh Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 6 minutes ago, KL2 said: Really just one 25. No way he doesn't opt out. I can think of two ways: He’s hurt. He sucks. Each are squarely within the range of outcomes. It more than kind of stinks I have to root for him to opt out. Quote
Tiger337 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago I didn't see the opt out first, but the other deal was too good to be true. I am still happy with it. One year at a time with pitchers is fine. 1 Quote
Tenacious D Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Just now, gehringer_2 said: This is not a that large an economic commitment, I wonder if an offer to Bregman remains on the table. I would think so, especially since it’s not a long commitment. Nice to see a guy who wanted to be here come back. Makes the LA trade even better. Shades of Jim Slaton and the Brewers. Also makes me wonder if one of our young SP could be dealt (Mize?) for a bat. Quote
gehringer_2 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 minute ago, chasfh said: Flaherty at 2/35. I don’t love the player opt out, but yeah, I’m down. This adds some resilience against the inevitable pitching injuries - YCNHTMP! 1 Quote
monkeytargets39 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) 2 minutes ago, chasfh said: I can think of two ways: He’s hurt. He sucks. Each are squarely within the range of outcomes. It more than kind of stinks I have to root for him to opt out. We can always trade him for more top 100 prospects at the deadline too…. Edited 6 hours ago by monkeytargets39 Quote
papalawrence Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Just now, Tenacious D said: I would think so, especially since it’s not a long commitment. Nice to see a guy who wanted to be here come back. Makes the LA trade even better. Shades of Jim Slaton and the Brewers. Also makes me wonder if one of our young SP could be dealt (Mize?) for a bat. Nice Slaton reference. Still mad the Tigers lost Benji! 2 Quote
papalawrence Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Love the deal - improves odds with their window with Skubal 1 Quote
KL2 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 2 minutes ago, chasfh said: I can think of two ways: He’s hurt. He sucks. Each are squarely within the range of outcomes. It more than kind of stinks I have to root for him to opt out. Cobb pitched 16 innings and got 14 million. Look of course if he blows out his arm he's not gonna opt out. But then he's lost for that second year anyway. Quote
Tigermojo Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago They get him for another year and if he does prove to be healthy, they could extend him. Quote
Mr.TaterSalad Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago I'm a big fan of that Flaherty deal. We now have three solid, reliable starters in the rotation again and were able to do it for minimal costs. Well, we should be resigning Skubal to a big deal, but that hasn't happened yet. Quote
Tigermojo Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago I think my fan bias is showing because I think this is a great deal but Kim's deal wasn't. Quote
mtutiger Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 14 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said: This is not a that large an economic commitment, I wonder if an offer to Bregman remains on the table. I'd be surprised if it wasnt Quote
Tiger337 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 minute ago, Tigermojo said: I think my fan bias is showing because I think this is a great deal but Kim's deal wasn't. Well, Kim is going to miss the beginning of the season, so I didn't like that deal either. Quote
Tiger337 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 2 minutes ago, mtutiger said: I'd be surprised if it wasnt No need for him to be off the table. The Tigers do not have a big payroll. The question with him is if he has better offers. Quote
gehringer_2 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 minute ago, Tiger337 said: No need for him to be off the table. The Tigers do not have a big payroll. The question with him is if he has better offers. if Harris lands Bregman and Flaherty, he gets his GENIUS cap back, even with Torres. 1 Quote
mtutiger Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) 2 minutes ago, Tiger337 said: No need for him to be off the table. The Tigers do not have a big payroll. The question with him is if he has better offers. If anything, assuming that Bowden is right and the Tigers have the best offer on the table (big assumption), I would think Flaherty might make it ever so slightly more appealing to sign here Edited 6 hours ago by mtutiger 2 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.