Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

My. take on this:

I’m sure the agents and the union are in lockstep in holding the line on asking salaries. If one contract is signed for less than asking that can have a direct negative effect on another free agents market standing. One contract signing will have an influence, good or bad, depending, on other contracts. I believe some of these players would be willing to take less than their agents are asking but the agents and union know that to give an inch on one deal will impact future contracts in the future. 

Edited by 1776
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
Just now, gehringer_2 said:

The ascendancy of football over baseball as the nation's primary sports obsession generally parallels the general collapse of civility in American society. Just sayin'...........

That said, I'll be watching with some friends tonight....🤷‍♀️

Well, the Super Bowl is much better than a WSox-Seattle game that's 6-2 in the 6th inning. 😆😆

Posted
14 minutes ago, Sports_Freak said:

Well, the Super Bowl is much better than a WSox-Seattle game that's 6-2 in the 6th inning. 😆😆

I disagree. In a White Sox-Seattle game it means at least one of these two teams has to lose and to me that’s a plus because one way or the other I win by seeing one of them lose - which is great. I rarely feel like a winner at the end of a Super Bowl.

As it is, I’ve lived in the Northwest for almost 40 years and I’m an elitist about my own team having a 124-year track record. So to me the Mariners are not a real team while my team was pretty much formed on the sixth day by God, as far as I’m concerned. As for the White Sox the enmity I feel for them does not need to be explained.

Posted
30 minutes ago, Sports_Freak said:

Well, the Super Bowl is much better than a WSox-Seattle game that's 6-2 in the 6th inning. 😆😆

No. No it is not. The super bowl is like a yankees-red sox game on Sunday night baseball before pitch clocks. Everything takes 3x as long, and then you have to do "God Bless America " and "Sweet Caroline" times 100 for the halftime show. JUST PLAY THE DAMN GAME. 

I know, I know, everyone needs to make their money, but it is unwatchable to me.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
48 minutes ago, Sports_Freak said:

I agree. What can a person do with 180 million that he couldn't do with 160 million? It's just part greed, part ego and part bragging rights. But it also makes him look like an as*hol*.

Scott Boras is the guy who wants that extra 20m

  • Like 1
Posted
On 2/8/2025 at 7:42 AM, chasfh said:

I’d be more concerned with him in the field if we committed more than a year to him. As a stopgap while we wait for McGonigle, I think he’s at least adequate.

Eh… yeah, I guess.  But it still doesn’t comfort me for this season.

Posted
1 hour ago, Sports_Freak said:

Well, the Super Bowl is much better than a WSox-Seattle game that's 6-2 in the 6th inning. 😆😆

False.  A WSox-Seattle game likely means better weather than the Super Bowl.

Posted
1 hour ago, romad1 said:

I think the Bregman thing is a Willie Wonka-like test of the Detroit fan base by Scott Boras.  "Snozzberries, who ever heard of a Snozzberry?" 

Some of you punks are going to have to go through some things before he signs.

The local Krogers is always out of snozzberries.

  • Like 1
Posted
48 minutes ago, Tigermojo said:

I think Bregman will sign when they can place players on the 60 day IL and he's just using Detroit and Toronto to get as much money from Houston as possible.

this is actually probably what is happening.  Why lose a talented player if you don't have to.  Now is that us or another one of the hopefuls?

Posted
4 hours ago, Sports_Freak said:

I agree. What can a person do with 180 million that he couldn't do with 160 million? It's just part greed, part ego and part bragging rights. But it also makes him look like an as*hol*.

What, they’re not letting us write out “asshole” anymore?

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, chasfh said:

What, they’re not letting us write out “asshole” anymore?

Sure you can.  Just don't call him a ****.  (as in Allen)

Edited by Tiger337
Posted

With an unsettled infield, Whitfield may not be a bad option. He shouldn’t cost much and it would likely be a one year deal. He just turned 36 years of age. 

Posted
2 hours ago, 1776 said:

With an unsettled infield, Whitfield may not be a bad option. He shouldn’t cost much and it would likely be a one year deal. He just turned 36 years of age. 

Used to be a Tiger Killer.  Maybe Comerica helped—seems like a park made for him.

Posted
16 hours ago, Sports_Freak said:

Well, the Super Bowl is much better than a WSox-Seattle game that's 6-2 in the 6th inning. 😆😆

I'd rather watch the baseball game

Posted
2 hours ago, Tigermojo said:

I think their internal options are probably better. 

I'm torn.  I like the potential of all their kids right now.  I was listening to the Tiger Territory from last week and they were talking about Miggy's extension in 2014 and how he was under contract until 2016 before that happened.  I think we got the wrong end of that for the health of the team overall.  Imagine a trade haul for Miggy during 2015/2016 and what that might have done for the franchise.  But, Detroit fans love their stars or maybe we think we love our stars.  

Posted
34 minutes ago, Tenacious D said:

Used to be a Tiger Killer.  Maybe Comerica helped—seems like a park made for him.

I remember those days. I’d be good with Merryfield in Detroit.
I’ve seen Justin Turner’s name dropped as a possible Tiger signing. Please, no! 

Posted (edited)
18 hours ago, Sports_Freak said:

I agree. What can a person do with 180 million that he couldn't do with 160 million? It's just part greed, part ego and part bragging rights. But it also makes him look like an as*hol*.

its not directly about the money its about how much your worth to your team aka a **** measuring contest... but the bigger bank account doesnt hurt either

or you could ask whats 20 million to a billionaire family like the illitchs?

Edited by Toddwert
  • Like 1
Posted

Maybe deep down the Tigers don’t really want Bregman. Hinch did the right thing and had his devil‘s tail docked after the scandal. 

But but there’s a lot of sub-reddits where it’s discussed that Bregman never had his devil’s tail docked and since he doesn’t wear his socks high, the Tigers are worried it’ll stick out from under the hem of his pants when he gets excited and be a bad example for the rest of the team on the field and especially in the clubhouse. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...