Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
43 minutes ago, casimir said:

So are you giving him a contract for life?  What about Andy Ibanez?

A contract for life? What are you talking about? I just don't want to trade away one of our best power hitters. Ibanez has a nice warm seat on the bench for pinch hitting against LH pitchers.

Posted
7 hours ago, gehringer_2 said:

Unless the sports media ecosystem (i.e, the money machine) totally collapses, Skubal is gone. The only question is bite the bullet and trade him while you can get a good return or take the performance and accept the comp pick as consolation.

 

I don't know that Skubal is necessarily gone, but I do know with the Harris front office, Tarik's not getting a stupid contract. And by that, I don't mean an expensive contract. I mean a Miggy-at-the-end-type contract.

Posted
4 hours ago, Tigermojo said:

I prefer the money goes to developing future versions of Soto than overpaying free agents.

Washington developed this version of Soto. How'd that work out for them in the long run?

Posted

So, Alex Cobb: throws fast but doesn't strike guys out; doesn't walk guys and gets a lot of worm-burners. Gets hit hard but it's into the ground, so not many barrels.

Harris has a type—and he signed him in San Francisco. I assume he's got something Fetter can work with.

Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, chasfh said:

Washington developed this version of Soto. How'd that work out for them in the long run?

I was surprised, not as terrible as one might think. The nats got 5.2 WAR this season for the guys they got for Soto  - two more are still cooking in the minors. Soto has averaged a little over 5 WAR per season over his career. Granted he tallied 7.9 this season as he hit 40+ HR for the 1st time, and if he keeps hitting 40+ he's likely to stay above the 5 WAR average for a while. On the other side,  the Nats have $50M a year to invest in something - if they can do a good job of it.

Edited by gehringer_2
Posted
2 minutes ago, gehringer_2 said:

Not as terrible as one might think. The nats got 5.2 WAR this season for the guys they got for Soto  - two more are still cooking in the minors. Soto has averaged a little over 5 WAR per season over his career. Granted he tallied 7.9 this season as he hit 40+ HR for the 1st time, and if he keeps hitting 40+ he's likely to stay above the 5 WAR average for a while. On the other side,  the Nats have $50M a year to invest in something - if they can do a good job of it.

Fair point.

Posted
24 minutes ago, chasfh said:

Washington developed this version of Soto. How'd that work out for them in the long run?

They got a World Series his rookie year, and between him and players acquired for him, they have about 30 fWAR and counting. It worked out fine. They have James Wood.

Posted

Expounding on earlier:

Cobb is a guy who is either good (or at least average) or injured. Granted, a year ago I was saying the same about Maeda. I just can't help but think about what Fetter and co got out of Hanifee, who has a similar fastball. I really don't want a multi year deal where you are stuck with a dead weight pitcher for years down the road, like the one I invoked earlier in this paragraph. Cobb's a reasonable risk.

Posted
7 hours ago, gehringer_2 said:

Unless the sports media ecosystem (i.e, the money machine) totally collapses, Skubal is gone. The only question is bite the bullet and trade him while you can get a good return or take the performance and accept the comp pick as consolation.

 

Absolutely agree.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...